<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HIP HIP hooray - Ruth Kelly continues her U turn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/05/22/hip-hip-hooray-ruth-kelly-continues-her-u-turn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/05/22/hip-hip-hooray-ruth-kelly-continues-her-u-turn/</link>
	<description>Conservative Party Member of Parliament for Wokingham</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: GregB</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/05/22/hip-hip-hooray-ruth-kelly-continues-her-u-turn/#comment-2977</link>
		<dc:creator>GregB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 22:26:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=271#comment-2977</guid>
		<description>I can understand the angst about the energy survey, but why is everyone so against HIPS? It has just taken us 18 months to sell our house, due to failed chains etc, so I see anything that helps to get an early legal contract on the buyer, even if it is just on, say a few thousand pounds 'earnest' money, must be an improvement over the existing dreadful situation in England. We would have happily paid up to 2,000GBP up front to avoid the eventual very high costs associated with purchasers who melted at the 12th hour, over and over again.

Talk to a few people who have had to move because of their jobs and hear the nightmare sales many went through to move their families, or the damage that weekending does to families. By all means fight the fight to detach this from EU directives, but please, please allow the government to come up with a better system - HIPS was a step forward, if a faultering step IMO.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand the angst about the energy survey, but why is everyone so against HIPS? It has just taken us 18 months to sell our house, due to failed chains etc, so I see anything that helps to get an early legal contract on the buyer, even if it is just on, say a few thousand pounds &#8216;earnest&#8217; money, must be an improvement over the existing dreadful situation in England. We would have happily paid up to 2,000GBP up front to avoid the eventual very high costs associated with purchasers who melted at the 12th hour, over and over again.</p>
<p>Talk to a few people who have had to move because of their jobs and hear the nightmare sales many went through to move their families, or the damage that weekending does to families. By all means fight the fight to detach this from EU directives, but please, please allow the government to come up with a better system - HIPS was a step forward, if a faultering step IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Fairney</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/05/22/hip-hip-hooray-ruth-kelly-continues-her-u-turn/#comment-2734</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Fairney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 21:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=271#comment-2734</guid>
		<description>They've really lost the plot on this one.  Are the HIP's to still include local authoity searches?  How can the government deem they are valid for 12 months, surely they expire long before?  If you complete "replies to enquiries" isn't there a reasonable likelihood that some changes may occur in one year?  What is the possible justification for saying 4-bed houses should have HIP's and not 3-bed houses?  The "energy surveys" are pointless.  Are they really saying that couples up and down the land will be saying "Well the first house was </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ve really lost the plot on this one.  Are the HIP&#8217;s to still include local authoity searches?  How can the government deem they are valid for 12 months, surely they expire long before?  If you complete &#8220;replies to enquiries&#8221; isn&#8217;t there a reasonable likelihood that some changes may occur in one year?  What is the possible justification for saying 4-bed houses should have HIP&#8217;s and not 3-bed houses?  The &#8220;energy surveys&#8221; are pointless.  Are they really saying that couples up and down the land will be saying &#8220;Well the first house was</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Tomkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/05/22/hip-hip-hooray-ruth-kelly-continues-her-u-turn/#comment-2718</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Tomkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 16:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=271#comment-2718</guid>
		<description>I don't understand the excitement when the wretched scheme has only bee put back two months and is being phased in. The point is that this rotten government is still proceeding with this ludicrous scheme. Or are you going to tell me that the whole idea will be dropped when Brown takes over? I very much doubt that happening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand the excitement when the wretched scheme has only bee put back two months and is being phased in. The point is that this rotten government is still proceeding with this ludicrous scheme. Or are you going to tell me that the whole idea will be dropped when Brown takes over? I very much doubt that happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/05/22/hip-hip-hooray-ruth-kelly-continues-her-u-turn/#comment-2715</link>
		<dc:creator>wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 16:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=271#comment-2715</guid>
		<description>You do know that these home information packs won't be stopped? Afterall they are an EU directive.

read more here:

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmhansrd/cm061101/text/61101w0001.htm

Its a question time debate in 2006. heres the bit you should look at:

Mr. Pickles: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the answer to the hon. Member for Surrey Heath (Michael Gove) of 9 October 2006, Official Report, column 367W, on energy performance certificates, whether an energy performance certificate will be required before a property owner can (a) privately let a domestic dwelling and (b) renew any existing rent agreement that was signed before the implementation of EU directive 2002/91/EC. [95810]

Yvette Cooper: EU directive 2002/91/EC, the energy performance of buildings directive, requires member states to introduce measures that require energy performance certificates to be made available when buildings are constructed, sold or rented out. Private rentals are included in the scope of the directive, which must be fully implemented by January 2009.



The only way to stop the HIPs is by getting out of the EU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do know that these home information packs won&#8217;t be stopped? Afterall they are an EU directive.</p>
<p>read more here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmhansrd/cm061101/text/61101w0001.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmhansrd/cm061101/text/61101w0001.htm</a></p>
<p>Its a question time debate in 2006. heres the bit you should look at:</p>
<p>Mr. Pickles: To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government pursuant to the answer to the hon. Member for Surrey Heath (Michael Gove) of 9 October 2006, Official Report, column 367W, on energy performance certificates, whether an energy performance certificate will be required before a property owner can (a) privately let a domestic dwelling and (b) renew any existing rent agreement that was signed before the implementation of EU directive 2002/91/EC. [95810]</p>
<p>Yvette Cooper: EU directive 2002/91/EC, the energy performance of buildings directive, requires member states to introduce measures that require energy performance certificates to be made available when buildings are constructed, sold or rented out. Private rentals are included in the scope of the directive, which must be fully implemented by January 2009.</p>
<p>The only way to stop the HIPs is by getting out of the EU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
