<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: There were no cuts and there will be no cuts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/08/21/there-were-no-cuts-and-there-will-be-no-cuts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/08/21/there-were-no-cuts-and-there-will-be-no-cuts/</link>
	<description>Conservative Party Member of Parliament for Wokingham</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven_L</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/08/21/there-were-no-cuts-and-there-will-be-no-cuts/#comment-5101</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven_L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/08/21/there-were-no-cuts-and-there-will-be-no-cuts/#comment-5101</guid>
		<description>The best example of Labour's incompetent spending goes on up here at that most famous of quango's, the Rural non-Payments Agency.  Many people I know or have met have worked there at one time or another.  They basically spend millions of pounds hiring people to correspond with angry farmers who are not being given their EU subsidy payments.

Of course, farmers tend to vote Conservative and young working class folk in Newcastle and North Tyneside tend to vote Labour.  I'm such a cynic, I really should be more positive, I'm sure the real reason that the farmers didn't get the money the EU had sent them was because the computer said 'no' just like Margaret Beckett said.

Reply: Computers say what people tell them to say. Either the Minister gave the wrong instructions, or hired the wrong programmers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best example of Labour&#8217;s incompetent spending goes on up here at that most famous of quango&#8217;s, the Rural non-Payments Agency.  Many people I know or have met have worked there at one time or another.  They basically spend millions of pounds hiring people to correspond with angry farmers who are not being given their EU subsidy payments.</p>
<p>Of course, farmers tend to vote Conservative and young working class folk in Newcastle and North Tyneside tend to vote Labour.  I&#8217;m such a cynic, I really should be more positive, I&#8217;m sure the real reason that the farmers didn&#8217;t get the money the EU had sent them was because the computer said &#8216;no&#8217; just like Margaret Beckett said.</p>
<p>Reply: Computers say what people tell them to say. Either the Minister gave the wrong instructions, or hired the wrong programmers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Makara</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/08/21/there-were-no-cuts-and-there-will-be-no-cuts/#comment-5097</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Makara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/08/21/there-were-no-cuts-and-there-will-be-no-cuts/#comment-5097</guid>
		<description>It really isn't a question of how much is spend but rather how well the money is spent. Socialist, or in the case of New Labour, social opportunist governments, like to create layer upon layer of bureaucratic infrastructure, which eventually loses all command structure and becomes at best an inefficent gravy train. This in particular has been the fate of the NHS. The future Conservative government must set up a troubleshooting team to investigate and eradicate all unnecessary bureaucracy. So much money is lost and creamed off by an army of administators who milk the system.

Reply: I agree about the problem. It makes cutting wasteful and needless expenditure much easier because there is so much of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really isn&#8217;t a question of how much is spend but rather how well the money is spent. Socialist, or in the case of New Labour, social opportunist governments, like to create layer upon layer of bureaucratic infrastructure, which eventually loses all command structure and becomes at best an inefficent gravy train. This in particular has been the fate of the NHS. The future Conservative government must set up a troubleshooting team to investigate and eradicate all unnecessary bureaucracy. So much money is lost and creamed off by an army of administators who milk the system.</p>
<p>Reply: I agree about the problem. It makes cutting wasteful and needless expenditure much easier because there is so much of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/08/21/there-were-no-cuts-and-there-will-be-no-cuts/#comment-5088</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2007/08/21/there-were-no-cuts-and-there-will-be-no-cuts/#comment-5088</guid>
		<description>Ah, to be fair, Labour does spend more money on Health and Education.

Unfortunately, because they are utterly incompetent this is wasted on bureaucracy, quango monitoring organisation, the bright idea du jour, or some other such rubbish.

I've worked with LEAs for years. The manpower is insane - in my area about half the people who work for the LEA don't actually go near children - the other half includes teachers, TAs, pyschologists etc. 

I understand the need for some support staff, but WTF are the rest of them doing.

PS: Your treatment by the BBC was diabolical. Don't recall the idiot Prescott's stupid ideas being illustrated by pictures of him thumping people (or shagging his secretary)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, to be fair, Labour does spend more money on Health and Education.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, because they are utterly incompetent this is wasted on bureaucracy, quango monitoring organisation, the bright idea du jour, or some other such rubbish.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve worked with LEAs for years. The manpower is insane - in my area about half the people who work for the LEA don&#8217;t actually go near children - the other half includes teachers, TAs, pyschologists etc. </p>
<p>I understand the need for some support staff, but WTF are the rest of them doing.</p>
<p>PS: Your treatment by the BBC was diabolical. Don&#8217;t recall the idiot Prescott&#8217;s stupid ideas being illustrated by pictures of him thumping people (or shagging his secretary)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
