I for one thank David for giving me heart when I was so tired of the way my liberties are being eroded – legislation is ruining our Society. What we are now left are teh young pushing at the edge of the envelope because of the Government wanting to turn all of us into obediant robots.

Reply: David Cameron is just stating the obvious, that holding a by-election on a single issue is a risk, as the main candidate cannot control events, the other candidates or the voters! I still wish David well and expect to see him returned successfully by electors who know he is a good MP.

Couldn’t find David’s email or website but just want to add my support to his campaign against our liberty. I really believe that the powers to be and the media have underestimated the swell of concern about the slow erosion of our hard earned rights.

all the best

Richard

I hope David David wins his by-election and going by the popular support from the public at large, I have little doubt that he will do. If and when he does go back to the commons, I hope David Cameron will restore him to his position, shadowing Jaqui Smith.

I read yesterday that Labour is considering putting up the baggage handler from Glasgow Airport on an anti terrorist ticket. If they do this then it will demonstrate beyond doubt (as if any more were needed) that this is a cynically rotten government, demonstrated further by it’s arrogant position regarding the result of the Irish Referendum.

letter sent to:-WEST MIDLANDS STRATEGIC HEALTH 7th June 2008:
Dear Sir,
For the attention of Steve Hilton.
Fluoride in my tap water supply:
I understand that you can answer questions on fluoride addition to the tap water supply in Bromsgrove area and that it is your sole decision on applying this chemical and that no public consultation ever took place before you added it….but in 2003, action(an act) was taken to ensure that fluoride could be added anywhere in the UK without public consultation from that date onwards, would it be therefore correct to say that the addition of fluoride was in fact illegal in 1985.
It is also understood that many other Health authorities are refusing to add fluoride, could you ascertain for me from these other Health authorities why you feel it is necessary to add fluoride and others do not!
Could you advise also why Solihull with the same amount of fluoride in the tap water sees less rotten teeth in children than Birmingham with the same level of fluoride in their tap water please and that Bromsgrove also sees less rotten teeth than Birmingham.
Can you advise why the Water companies require indemnity against adding fluoride to the water supply, why would they want this, is it because it is in fact a poison.
Please can you state why you do not teach children to brush their teeth and receive a balanced diet to give the fluoride required for healthy teeth, it is understood that Bradford have now started a drive in Mosques to teach them the benefits of healthy brushing and diet.
Can you advise why you continue to add the fluoride when the York report in 1999 said that poor studies were furnished for analyses.
Can you state that there are no lasting side effects to consuming fluoride, as I have read that colon cancer, bone brittleness, children’s behaviour patterns being affected, headaches, indigestion problems.
I have enquired if a test can be made on my own body for the fluoride effect and content but have been refused by my doctor because he says that the NHS will not do this test for me.
Lastly please advise that as there is now 1ppm of fluoride in the tap water, how much food and water can I consume per day before I am in the danger zone, understanding that 1.5ppm gives fluorosis.
I would appreciate your reply as soon as possible.
This request was made sometime ago to your department but no answer came forth.
Thanking you in anticipation and not wanting an answer that goes like Alan Johnson told you it must go in, as it is primarily your decision to add fluoride and no one else’s.
Yours faithfully,
Stan Francis
for Bromsgrove Clean Water Group

Wild horses won’t keep me from supporting Davis either.

Can’t believe I was never a fan of Davis…I could kiss him now!

We have seen some principled stands by a number of conservatives, including your good self, over the past few months. I am not a conservative, but I admire the stance you chaps have taken. DD has my support, and indeed, the support of millions of ordinary people. I will donate to his cause should he require it.

We are, in my opinion, under a concerted attack by powers seeking to destroy our nation state, and transfer our allegiance to the European super state. The “Big Brother” apparatus is being installed to close down resistance, to divide the public and to dog train us into accepting continual monitoring of our lives. Children are being fingerprinted in schools as part of this dog training, and our police services are gradually pressured into performing oppressive actions. The Common assessment framework, Terrorism legislation, Civil contingencies act are all forming a veneer that overrides our current legislation and rights.

I quote Alex Jones
“THIS IS AMAZING, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN. SO THIS IS WHY WE RESTRICT THE SCOPE AND SIZE OF GOVERNMENT AND ITS POWER OVER US IN OUR LIVES. BECAUSE WE KNOW THERE ARE CRIMINALS ON THE STREET, WE KNOW THERE’S BAD PEOPLE, BUT THRE DON’T HAVE THE MECHANISMS, THE MACHINERY OF GOVERNMENT AND MILITARY AND MILITARIZED POLICE AND PRISON COMPLEXES TO OPPRESS AT LEVELS NEVER BEFORE SEEN”

It was very interesting that the Westminster village and political media failed to see the broad wave of support that David Davis’ stance would attract – and typical of the Labour spin machine that their first reaction was to try to brand him as crazy.

As a 57-year old gardener and grandfather I have in the last 4 years been:

a) wrongly accused of defrauding the Pensions and Benefits Agency, had my bank accounts examined without my permission and my credit record seriously damaged. I was questioned under “caution” and despite the “case” being dropped some years ago have received no word of apology, nor any correspondence from them whatsoever.

b) been “arrested” at a Police roadblock for stealing my own car (this was on television). What they did not show on television was the ensuing 9-hour nightmare where I was arrested, internally searched, drug-tested, fingerprinted and had my DNA taken. To add insult to injury, I had to pay £200 to get my car back and have been informed that due to changes in PACE, there is no chance of suing the Police for wrongful arrest. My Polish employees were absolutely horrified by the incident and told me that even under the communist regime, this would not have happened in their country.

Make no mistake, this is a Stalinist regime and we all have a duty to fight it and regain our historic freedoms.

I am not normally a Conservative voter and I do not live in his constituency but I would vote to re-elect him, were I in his constituency.

Further, if the Conservative party was unequivocal in its support and David Cameron gave a cast-iron guarantee to repeal RIPA and 42 days and kill ID cards if elected to government, that would secure my vote in the next general election regardless of my views on other matters. Failing that, I will vote Liberal at the next election because of their stand on the issue of liberty.

Reply: Cameron and the new Shadow Home Sec fully support the Davis stance on the freedom issues he has highlighted.

Somewhere, someone claims that 67% of the electorate support 42 days detention without charge. Why have I not met anyone who actually supports any of the recent or proposed legislation ?

How serious is the “terrorist threat” ? How compromised is our “national security” ?

Though the attacks which have occurred in the UK have been horrible, they have not been so many and so severe as would justify this government’s paranoia. If the terrorists are being apprehended before acting on their plans, why are there not more court cases ? (words left out)

It just does not add up. Am I really living in a country where “the people” have become so stupid that they accept the words of “proven liars” ?

The individual citizens of this country are now more thoroughly documented, monitored and watched than citizens of the Soviet Union in the days of Stalin. (words left out)
Even were the “threat” a thousand times worse, these policies, laws and practises could not be justified. Such an invasion of privacy and removal of civil liberties could only be allowed if those who promote them can guarantee that we will never find ourselves ruled by some future (tyrantc -ed). I do not understand why this governemnt does not give such a guarantee – it would only be one more lie !

For those who say “Why worry – if you have done nothing wrong and have nothing to hide…” I can only offer the unconditional pity that one reserves for the totally moronic and those totally bereft of any common sense. You may not want to hide from Mr Brown’s government because they clearly care deeply for you and your family… but you may not feel so comfortable under a (nasty -ed)government.

“It can’t happen here…” It is happening and NOW !

It must make real Labour supporters extremely embarassed to have so many MP’s who are not prepared to stand up for democracy and freedom, and act in a way that is totally contrary to the British way of life.

David Davis deserves the support of everyone who believes that our fundamental freedoms, which you so eloquently describe, are worth fighting for, and his bravery and principled stand should go down as a victory for decency and common sense.

New Labour have given in to the terrorists by doing their job of destroying our civil liberties for them. It now will fall to the likes of David Davis and the Conservatives to make a stand.

New Labour says they have the support of the electorate for 42 days – well, they should show it by fighting a general election NOW by asking the electorate two questions:

1: Do you support 42 days detention without trial?

2: Do you support the Lisbon Treaty?

If they are so sure about what the electorate thinks, then why not refresh their mandate and gave Brown his first?