<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The EU and Zimbabwe abandon democracy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/07/21/the-eu-and-zimbabwe-abandon-democracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/07/21/the-eu-and-zimbabwe-abandon-democracy/</link>
	<description>Conservative Party Member of Parliament for Wokingham</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 05:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Harrington</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/07/21/the-eu-and-zimbabwe-abandon-democracy/#comment-22660</link>
		<dc:creator>David Harrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1198#comment-22660</guid>
		<description>Re Mugabe: a cultural point, made to me recently by Nigerian colleagues - apart from his iconic status as a freedom fighter,  in Southern Africa age automatically commands respect (do we not wish that sometimes in England?)

Mugabe is 82. While this may offend against western cultural norms and our view of the role of opposition as expressed by our MP, realistically Mugabe at his age will only go 'quietly' and in honour, not in defeat. The Mbeki settlement is  - I regret -the best hope yet.

David Harrington</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re Mugabe: a cultural point, made to me recently by Nigerian colleagues - apart from his iconic status as a freedom fighter,  in Southern Africa age automatically commands respect (do we not wish that sometimes in England?)</p>
<p>Mugabe is 82. While this may offend against western cultural norms and our view of the role of opposition as expressed by our MP, realistically Mugabe at his age will only go &#8216;quietly&#8217; and in honour, not in defeat. The Mbeki settlement is  - I regret -the best hope yet.</p>
<p>David Harrington</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/07/21/the-eu-and-zimbabwe-abandon-democracy/#comment-22652</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1198#comment-22652</guid>
		<description>I think the Tories could usefully support the Lib Dims promise of a referendum on continued EU membership.

It would be interesting to see them then dangle in their own wind as they tried to explain why their own proposal is now an example of Tory extremism &#38; they will be voting against it :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Tories could usefully support the Lib Dims promise of a referendum on continued EU membership.</p>
<p>It would be interesting to see them then dangle in their own wind as they tried to explain why their own proposal is now an example of Tory extremism &amp; they will be voting against it <img src='http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Eyles</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/07/21/the-eu-and-zimbabwe-abandon-democracy/#comment-22640</link>
		<dc:creator>David Eyles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1198#comment-22640</guid>
		<description>Having worked in West Africa for two years in the '80s, I still have memories, fond and otherwise, of that continent. I also have some sympathy for Tsvangiri. He is in the invidious position of having clearly won an election and then watching whilst his own people are having a fleeting glimpse of democracy murdered, beaten and tortured out of them. Mugabe is an old man who may have been on the verge of conceeding defeat at the ballot box, but has (most likely) been propelled into the current situation by hard liners in the military who are frightened of the reckoning that would await them if the MDC were to form a real government. (There is nothing so brutal as an African revenge). "Power sharing" is undoubtedly a cosmetic exercise in face saving which may be necessary for the MDC to eventually stop the lunatics in Zanu PF beating up their opponents and so bring peace to Zimbabwe. It may not be democracy as we know it, but for that shattered country, it may work to bring some stability. The only alternative is for the whole of the MDC to go into hiding and exile. Which is the least favourable option for Zimbabwe.

However, your comments on the EU are, as usual, extremely apposite. I will only add that Lord Hailsham commented in 1978, just before the '79 election that brought Margaret Thatcher to power, that the sign of of a strong democracy is a strong opposition. I note that today, we have a strong opposition, but that our democracy appears to be almost in tatters after a decade of a Labour government that came into power not to govern a democracy, but to take and maintain absolute control over a client state. A view which it clearly shares with the faceless incumbents in the EU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having worked in West Africa for two years in the &#8217;80s, I still have memories, fond and otherwise, of that continent. I also have some sympathy for Tsvangiri. He is in the invidious position of having clearly won an election and then watching whilst his own people are having a fleeting glimpse of democracy murdered, beaten and tortured out of them. Mugabe is an old man who may have been on the verge of conceeding defeat at the ballot box, but has (most likely) been propelled into the current situation by hard liners in the military who are frightened of the reckoning that would await them if the MDC were to form a real government. (There is nothing so brutal as an African revenge). &#8220;Power sharing&#8221; is undoubtedly a cosmetic exercise in face saving which may be necessary for the MDC to eventually stop the lunatics in Zanu PF beating up their opponents and so bring peace to Zimbabwe. It may not be democracy as we know it, but for that shattered country, it may work to bring some stability. The only alternative is for the whole of the MDC to go into hiding and exile. Which is the least favourable option for Zimbabwe.</p>
<p>However, your comments on the EU are, as usual, extremely apposite. I will only add that Lord Hailsham commented in 1978, just before the &#8216;79 election that brought Margaret Thatcher to power, that the sign of of a strong democracy is a strong opposition. I note that today, we have a strong opposition, but that our democracy appears to be almost in tatters after a decade of a Labour government that came into power not to govern a democracy, but to take and maintain absolute control over a client state. A view which it clearly shares with the faceless incumbents in the EU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anoneumouse</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/07/21/the-eu-and-zimbabwe-abandon-democracy/#comment-22637</link>
		<dc:creator>anoneumouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1198#comment-22637</guid>
		<description>Dear Anoneumouse.......love David 

Subj: RE: I will withdraw the Conservative Party from the EPP by Christmas. (Frimley 23/11/05)
Date: 06/01/06 13:35:26 GMT Standard Time
From: CAMEROND@parliament.uk
To: Anoneumouse@aol.com

Thank you for writing to David Cameron - he's asked me to thank you and to say that he appreciated what you had to say.

David Cameron has made clear that it is his firm policy that the Conservative Party under his leadership will not remain a member of the European Peoples Party-European Democrats Group (EPP-ED) in the European Parliament, and will aim to form a new grouping which reflects more closely our views on the way forward for Europe.

The Conservative Party has a fundamentally different approach on the key institutional and constitutional questions relating to the future direction of the European Union, and it is natural that we should wish to ally ourselves with parties which share that view. But we intend to maintain close relations with other centre-right parties with which we agree on much, but not on these issues.

David Cameron has asked the new Shadow Foreign Secretary to take forward this process, with appropriate consultation of all involved. In seeking a new alignment within the European Parliament, the Conservative Party
will aim to continue to work closely with fellow centre-right parties in the European Parliament on the many issues on which we agree.

Many thanks again for writing.

Yours sincerely,

David Beal
Correspondence Secretary
David Cameron's Office
House of Commons
London SW1A 0AA

Ah yes, Firm Political Promises</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Anoneumouse&#8230;&#8230;.love David </p>
<p>Subj: RE: I will withdraw the Conservative Party from the EPP by Christmas. (Frimley 23/11/05)<br />
Date: 06/01/06 13:35:26 GMT Standard Time<br />
From: <a href="mailto:CAMEROND@parliament.uk">CAMEROND@parliament.uk</a><br />
To: <a href="mailto:Anoneumouse@aol.com">Anoneumouse@aol.com</a></p>
<p>Thank you for writing to David Cameron - he&#8217;s asked me to thank you and to say that he appreciated what you had to say.</p>
<p>David Cameron has made clear that it is his firm policy that the Conservative Party under his leadership will not remain a member of the European Peoples Party-European Democrats Group (EPP-ED) in the European Parliament, and will aim to form a new grouping which reflects more closely our views on the way forward for Europe.</p>
<p>The Conservative Party has a fundamentally different approach on the key institutional and constitutional questions relating to the future direction of the European Union, and it is natural that we should wish to ally ourselves with parties which share that view. But we intend to maintain close relations with other centre-right parties with which we agree on much, but not on these issues.</p>
<p>David Cameron has asked the new Shadow Foreign Secretary to take forward this process, with appropriate consultation of all involved. In seeking a new alignment within the European Parliament, the Conservative Party<br />
will aim to continue to work closely with fellow centre-right parties in the European Parliament on the many issues on which we agree.</p>
<p>Many thanks again for writing.</p>
<p>Yours sincerely,</p>
<p>David Beal<br />
Correspondence Secretary<br />
David Cameron&#8217;s Office<br />
House of Commons<br />
London SW1A 0AA</p>
<p>Ah yes, Firm Political Promises</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikestallard</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/07/21/the-eu-and-zimbabwe-abandon-democracy/#comment-22630</link>
		<dc:creator>mikestallard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 16:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1198#comment-22630</guid>
		<description>Mugabe was an admitted Marxist who looked for a one party state even when he was a terrorist. "He won the general elections of 1980, the first in which the majority black Africans participated, amid reports of violent intimidation by the militant freedom fighters he now controlled. Mugabe then became the first Prime Minister of black-ruled Zimbabwe after calling for reconciliation between formerly warring parties, including the white people as well as rival parties.
"The early years of Mugabe's rule saw killings targeting the Ndebele tribe in the Matabeleland and Midlands areas of Zimbabwe." (Wikipedia). This Marxist has never been a democrat.
How Morgan Tsvangirai can trust him is quite beyond me. the Ndebele made that mistake. So did the white farmers.

Sarkozy, of course, argues that the other 26 states have rights just as much as the Irish. So there! He is real democrat! So was Stalin!
I am glad to hear, too, that the Irish are getting stroppy about having their democratic will overturned.
The millionaire who led the anti Lisbon vote in Ireland is now going to flood the EU elections with Libertas candidates whose only aim is to overturn Lisbon and make an important point. Are you going to encourage us, John, to vote for Libertas in the EU elections?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mugabe was an admitted Marxist who looked for a one party state even when he was a terrorist. &#8220;He won the general elections of 1980, the first in which the majority black Africans participated, amid reports of violent intimidation by the militant freedom fighters he now controlled. Mugabe then became the first Prime Minister of black-ruled Zimbabwe after calling for reconciliation between formerly warring parties, including the white people as well as rival parties.<br />
&#8220;The early years of Mugabe&#8217;s rule saw killings targeting the Ndebele tribe in the Matabeleland and Midlands areas of Zimbabwe.&#8221; (Wikipedia). This Marxist has never been a democrat.<br />
How Morgan Tsvangirai can trust him is quite beyond me. the Ndebele made that mistake. So did the white farmers.</p>
<p>Sarkozy, of course, argues that the other 26 states have rights just as much as the Irish. So there! He is real democrat! So was Stalin!<br />
I am glad to hear, too, that the Irish are getting stroppy about having their democratic will overturned.<br />
The millionaire who led the anti Lisbon vote in Ireland is now going to flood the EU elections with Libertas candidates whose only aim is to overturn Lisbon and make an important point. Are you going to encourage us, John, to vote for Libertas in the EU elections?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freeborn John</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/07/21/the-eu-and-zimbabwe-abandon-democracy/#comment-22629</link>
		<dc:creator>Freeborn John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1198#comment-22629</guid>
		<description>I donâ€™t think we have a â€˜tyranny of the majorityâ€™ in Europe but there is definitely an â€˜authoritarianism of the qualified majorityâ€™. 300 years of Union between England and Scotland under one Parliament did not extinguish different legislation in many areas between these two countries because of a culture that tolerated different approaches. But after 15 years of political union in Europe we already see that the continental mania for harmonisation tolerates no diversity and will lead if unchecked to the federal pre-emption of national law in all areas where the EU has assumed competence. The illiberal instinct that others should be prevented from doing what they want to (e.g. working more than 48 hours, etc.) even if it causes no one else any harm is alive and well at international level in Brussels.

The root cause of the EU democracy problem though is that the different peoples that live in Europe do not consider themselves to be part of the same polity and so will not accept living under pan-European decisions that a majority of their countrymen do not support. So long as this is the case, no amount of institutional tinkering can make the EU democratic. International organisations retain democratic legitimacy in politically sensitive matters only through the use of unanimity. The EU began to lose its legitimacy as soon as it introduced the combination of (i) the imposition by qualified majority votes of (ii) law superior to national law in (iii) politically sensitive areas. There are three ways to cut this knot; for example by returning decision-making in politically sensitive areas to national control, or by replacing QMV by unanimity again, but the only way to prevent one parliament binding its successors is to make national law superior to European in all areas other than the common market. If this were done we would automatically create a â€œEurope a la carteâ€ and even QMV could then be retained for approving EU laws efficiently. Those governments voting in the Council of Ministers to approve EU legislation should be honour bound to implement it nationally for the lifetime of their administrations, but their successors should be able to take a different view without needing to seek the approval of anyone except their national parliament.

It strikes me that a Conservative government could at least try to negotiate such a â€œEurope a la carteâ€ with a fallback to EEA or Swiss-style EFTA + bilateral treaties should our Continental partners prove unwilling to negotiate seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I donâ€™t think we have a â€˜tyranny of the majorityâ€™ in Europe but there is definitely an â€˜authoritarianism of the qualified majorityâ€™. 300 years of Union between England and Scotland under one Parliament did not extinguish different legislation in many areas between these two countries because of a culture that tolerated different approaches. But after 15 years of political union in Europe we already see that the continental mania for harmonisation tolerates no diversity and will lead if unchecked to the federal pre-emption of national law in all areas where the EU has assumed competence. The illiberal instinct that others should be prevented from doing what they want to (e.g. working more than 48 hours, etc.) even if it causes no one else any harm is alive and well at international level in Brussels.</p>
<p>The root cause of the EU democracy problem though is that the different peoples that live in Europe do not consider themselves to be part of the same polity and so will not accept living under pan-European decisions that a majority of their countrymen do not support. So long as this is the case, no amount of institutional tinkering can make the EU democratic. International organisations retain democratic legitimacy in politically sensitive matters only through the use of unanimity. The EU began to lose its legitimacy as soon as it introduced the combination of (i) the imposition by qualified majority votes of (ii) law superior to national law in (iii) politically sensitive areas. There are three ways to cut this knot; for example by returning decision-making in politically sensitive areas to national control, or by replacing QMV by unanimity again, but the only way to prevent one parliament binding its successors is to make national law superior to European in all areas other than the common market. If this were done we would automatically create a â€œEurope a la carteâ€ and even QMV could then be retained for approving EU laws efficiently. Those governments voting in the Council of Ministers to approve EU legislation should be honour bound to implement it nationally for the lifetime of their administrations, but their successors should be able to take a different view without needing to seek the approval of anyone except their national parliament.</p>
<p>It strikes me that a Conservative government could at least try to negotiate such a â€œEurope a la carteâ€ with a fallback to EEA or Swiss-style EFTA + bilateral treaties should our Continental partners prove unwilling to negotiate seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/07/21/the-eu-and-zimbabwe-abandon-democracy/#comment-22626</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1198#comment-22626</guid>
		<description>I think labour lost a referendum on regional governance too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think labour lost a referendum on regional governance too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison Saville</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/07/21/the-eu-and-zimbabwe-abandon-democracy/#comment-22625</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison Saville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1198#comment-22625</guid>
		<description>I understand from today's BBC News that we are now banned from referring to acres, and must adopt hectares instead. No-one has asked us - any more than they did when the crown symbol was removed from beer glasses and replaced with the letters "CE". 

Perhaps some see these as trivial instances, but they are indicators that we are being swallowed up by the EU, and that it is more and more urgent that we should extricate ourselves from it and reclaim our sovereignty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand from today&#8217;s BBC News that we are now banned from referring to acres, and must adopt hectares instead. No-one has asked us - any more than they did when the crown symbol was removed from beer glasses and replaced with the letters &#8220;CE&#8221;. </p>
<p>Perhaps some see these as trivial instances, but they are indicators that we are being swallowed up by the EU, and that it is more and more urgent that we should extricate ourselves from it and reclaim our sovereignty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hannah</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/07/21/the-eu-and-zimbabwe-abandon-democracy/#comment-22622</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hannah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1198#comment-22622</guid>
		<description>Democracy has been dead in the United Kingdom for some time. One cannot be a member of the EU and still be a democracy, as so many of our powers have been outsourced to a kleptocracy which is immune from the ballot box. The EU can never be a democracy as is does not have a common demos. The political elite are painfully aware of this, which is why they go to so much trouble to keep their ideas out of the hands of voters. Each EU member state wants something different from the EU; each with their own obsessions and red lines. The only notable exception is the United Kingdom, which does not appear to drive ANY benefits from membership that could not be achieved by other means.

With important WTO talks taking place in Geneva today, the United Kingdom (a country which once had an empire on which the sun never set) has been relegated to the role of impotent bystander. While the rest of the world decides on the future of global trade, we must adhere to whatever common position Mandy can cobble together. This must be an example of the "influence" that EU membership gives us.

Now that the UK has formally ratified the Lisbon Treaty, and assuming that the 'colleagues' can come up with a creative solution to bypass the Irish electorate, we need an update from David Cameron on what a future Conservative Government will do about this unacceptable state of affairs. 

As a young professional, I am not ill, nor do I have children. Therefore the Schools'n'hospitals discourse is of little interest to me. With these issues being one of the few (in an ever-diminishing list of) competencies left in Westminster's hands after Lisbon, there's little incentive for me to go out and vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democracy has been dead in the United Kingdom for some time. One cannot be a member of the EU and still be a democracy, as so many of our powers have been outsourced to a kleptocracy which is immune from the ballot box. The EU can never be a democracy as is does not have a common demos. The political elite are painfully aware of this, which is why they go to so much trouble to keep their ideas out of the hands of voters. Each EU member state wants something different from the EU; each with their own obsessions and red lines. The only notable exception is the United Kingdom, which does not appear to drive ANY benefits from membership that could not be achieved by other means.</p>
<p>With important WTO talks taking place in Geneva today, the United Kingdom (a country which once had an empire on which the sun never set) has been relegated to the role of impotent bystander. While the rest of the world decides on the future of global trade, we must adhere to whatever common position Mandy can cobble together. This must be an example of the &#8220;influence&#8221; that EU membership gives us.</p>
<p>Now that the UK has formally ratified the Lisbon Treaty, and assuming that the &#8216;colleagues&#8217; can come up with a creative solution to bypass the Irish electorate, we need an update from David Cameron on what a future Conservative Government will do about this unacceptable state of affairs. </p>
<p>As a young professional, I am not ill, nor do I have children. Therefore the Schools&#8217;n'hospitals discourse is of little interest to me. With these issues being one of the few (in an ever-diminishing list of) competencies left in Westminster&#8217;s hands after Lisbon, there&#8217;s little incentive for me to go out and vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/07/21/the-eu-and-zimbabwe-abandon-democracy/#comment-22621</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1198#comment-22621</guid>
		<description>Half of the African Union don't practice it which rather explains their reluctance to condemn his appalling actions. 

What I fail to understand is why Mugabe even pretends at democracy. Surely whatever it it that's stopping him from declaring himself el-Presidente for Life (and having Morgan Tzvangarai shot) could be used to get him to resign...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Half of the African Union don&#8217;t practice it which rather explains their reluctance to condemn his appalling actions. </p>
<p>What I fail to understand is why Mugabe even pretends at democracy. Surely whatever it it that&#8217;s stopping him from declaring himself el-Presidente for Life (and having Morgan Tzvangarai shot) could be used to get him to resign&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iain</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/07/21/the-eu-and-zimbabwe-abandon-democracy/#comment-22620</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 12:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1198#comment-22620</guid>
		<description>"They have destroyed the institutions of the british constitution, "

At times  I wonder how our politicians expect to survive  long enough to pick up their solid gold pension plans, for as you say they have destabilised our constitution, rubbished everything we stand for, and sold us out to the EU, which means they couldn't respond to the wishes  of the British electorate even if they wanted to. 

So it seems to me all it would take is one further situation to develop and our politicians would be looking in the face of a lynch mob. Something not beyond the bounds of possibility, for it could be quite easily envisioned that in an economic downturn British people would find they are being made redundant in preference to foreign EU nationals, just as British business has preferred to employ them rather than British people. And the likely response from the British political establishment would be what? Would it be something like...' Well this is the joys  of the EU we have signed you up to that you didn't want, and no we aren't going to do anything about it as we don't want to lose face with our EU elite brethren and anyway you and your opinions don't matter!'

Hmmm I think I will have to buy some share in some rope manufactures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;They have destroyed the institutions of the british constitution, &#8221;</p>
<p>At times  I wonder how our politicians expect to survive  long enough to pick up their solid gold pension plans, for as you say they have destabilised our constitution, rubbished everything we stand for, and sold us out to the EU, which means they couldn&#8217;t respond to the wishes  of the British electorate even if they wanted to. </p>
<p>So it seems to me all it would take is one further situation to develop and our politicians would be looking in the face of a lynch mob. Something not beyond the bounds of possibility, for it could be quite easily envisioned that in an economic downturn British people would find they are being made redundant in preference to foreign EU nationals, just as British business has preferred to employ them rather than British people. And the likely response from the British political establishment would be what? Would it be something like&#8230;&#8217; Well this is the joys  of the EU we have signed you up to that you didn&#8217;t want, and no we aren&#8217;t going to do anything about it as we don&#8217;t want to lose face with our EU elite brethren and anyway you and your opinions don&#8217;t matter!&#8217;</p>
<p>Hmmm I think I will have to buy some share in some rope manufactures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acorn</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/07/21/the-eu-and-zimbabwe-abandon-democracy/#comment-22619</link>
		<dc:creator>Acorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1198#comment-22619</guid>
		<description>We have got democracy coming out of our ears in Euro land John, what's the problem, apart from the cost of it all that is?

I have my Parish Council, about 15 members on that one.
Then there is my District Council another 60 members.
My MP.
My County Council, another 70.
Then there is my EU Parliament Constituency MEPs, 10 of them.
Oh, can't forget my Regional Assembly 111 of them.
Not forgetting my EU Committee of the Regions Quangocrats - 44 for the UK - appointed by the Regional Assemblies.

And, probably a lot more that I don't know about.  All with my best interests at heart.

Now, if you tried to introduce this structure in southern Africa, you would probably run out of available Swiss bank account numbers on day one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have got democracy coming out of our ears in Euro land John, what&#8217;s the problem, apart from the cost of it all that is?</p>
<p>I have my Parish Council, about 15 members on that one.<br />
Then there is my District Council another 60 members.<br />
My MP.<br />
My County Council, another 70.<br />
Then there is my EU Parliament Constituency MEPs, 10 of them.<br />
Oh, can&#8217;t forget my Regional Assembly 111 of them.<br />
Not forgetting my EU Committee of the Regions Quangocrats - 44 for the UK - appointed by the Regional Assemblies.</p>
<p>And, probably a lot more that I don&#8217;t know about.  All with my best interests at heart.</p>
<p>Now, if you tried to introduce this structure in southern Africa, you would probably run out of available Swiss bank account numbers on day one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/07/21/the-eu-and-zimbabwe-abandon-democracy/#comment-22617</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1198#comment-22617</guid>
		<description>It is a commonly expressed opinion in the BBC &#38; other media that when the people vote in a way the BBC or British government don't like then that is not democracy. Often this means that the western powers increase funding for the losers who get described as the "democratic opposition".  

Thus when the overwhelming majority in Russia vote with Putin, Russia is "undemocratic" &#38; the Russians abject failure to vote for Kasparov's tiny western funded party proves it.

One of the fundamental problems with politics is that language gets misused &#38; words like "sustainable", "democracy", "freedom not to smoke", "social", "liberal","defence", "peace", "public information" etc get used to describe their opposites. Democracy is rule by the people, even when, as with Hamas, they make a bad choice. Anything less discredits the idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a commonly expressed opinion in the BBC &amp; other media that when the people vote in a way the BBC or British government don&#8217;t like then that is not democracy. Often this means that the western powers increase funding for the losers who get described as the &#8220;democratic opposition&#8221;.  </p>
<p>Thus when the overwhelming majority in Russia vote with Putin, Russia is &#8220;undemocratic&#8221; &amp; the Russians abject failure to vote for Kasparov&#8217;s tiny western funded party proves it.</p>
<p>One of the fundamental problems with politics is that language gets misused &amp; words like &#8220;sustainable&#8221;, &#8220;democracy&#8221;, &#8220;freedom not to smoke&#8221;, &#8220;social&#8221;, &#8220;liberal&#8221;,&#8221;defence&#8221;, &#8220;peace&#8221;, &#8220;public information&#8221; etc get used to describe their opposites. Democracy is rule by the people, even when, as with Hamas, they make a bad choice. Anything less discredits the idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Letters From A Tory</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/07/21/the-eu-and-zimbabwe-abandon-democracy/#comment-22613</link>
		<dc:creator>Letters From A Tory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 08:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1198#comment-22613</guid>
		<description>I agree that Sarkozy's attitude towards democratic principles is totally unacceptable.  He has told members of his own French party that the Irish must be made to vote again, and now he is making provision to nullify the Irish result.

Unbelievable.

http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Sarkozy&#8217;s attitude towards democratic principles is totally unacceptable.  He has told members of his own French party that the Irish must be made to vote again, and now he is making provision to nullify the Irish result.</p>
<p>Unbelievable.</p>
<p><a href="http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://lettersfromatory.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Fairney</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/07/21/the-eu-and-zimbabwe-abandon-democracy/#comment-22610</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Fairney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1198#comment-22610</guid>
		<description>It is quite shameful (as well as highly revealing) that the EU are adopting the same practice of disregarding incomvenient election results so loved by Zanu PF.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is quite shameful (as well as highly revealing) that the EU are adopting the same practice of disregarding incomvenient election results so loved by Zanu PF.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: APL</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2008/07/21/the-eu-and-zimbabwe-abandon-democracy/#comment-22609</link>
		<dc:creator>APL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 07:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=1198#comment-22609</guid>
		<description>JR: "The EU and Zimbabwe abandon democracy"

Really Mr Redwood, the surprising thing is you think such a headline worth writing.

The EU has never been interested in democracy, as for Mugabe, you can barely assemble a sentence containing both his name and the word democracy, without it becoming a cynical joke.

JR: "True democracy is not the tyranny of the majority ..."

Always so.

An acceptable democracy, is one where the wishes and inclinations of the majority are moderated by an acceptable and accepted  constitution, Reinforced by an independent judicial system.

In England, for a time, the  constitution was revered because it was slightly mystical ( there being no single consitutional document ), hallowed by time and having provided the best recipe  in Europe leading to the highest degree of freedom to the largest number of people.

The Labour contribution, accelerated by New Labour is to disparage something *just because* it is old. They have destroyed the institutions of the british constitution, while their accomplices in the media and yes, the Church of England, have disparaged every manifestation of british culture. 

We are facing a whirlwind, and everything that might have given us refuge once, has been destroyed.

The Tories have made their contribution too, thank you Mr Edward Heath, Mr, Geoffery Howe, Mr Kenneth Clarke, Mr Michael Hesteltine, to name but a few. Each of these have played their part in destroying the british constitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JR: &#8220;The EU and Zimbabwe abandon democracy&#8221;</p>
<p>Really Mr Redwood, the surprising thing is you think such a headline worth writing.</p>
<p>The EU has never been interested in democracy, as for Mugabe, you can barely assemble a sentence containing both his name and the word democracy, without it becoming a cynical joke.</p>
<p>JR: &#8220;True democracy is not the tyranny of the majority &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Always so.</p>
<p>An acceptable democracy, is one where the wishes and inclinations of the majority are moderated by an acceptable and accepted  constitution, Reinforced by an independent judicial system.</p>
<p>In England, for a time, the  constitution was revered because it was slightly mystical ( there being no single consitutional document ), hallowed by time and having provided the best recipe  in Europe leading to the highest degree of freedom to the largest number of people.</p>
<p>The Labour contribution, accelerated by New Labour is to disparage something *just because* it is old. They have destroyed the institutions of the british constitution, while their accomplices in the media and yes, the Church of England, have disparaged every manifestation of british culture. </p>
<p>We are facing a whirlwind, and everything that might have given us refuge once, has been destroyed.</p>
<p>The Tories have made their contribution too, thank you Mr Edward Heath, Mr, Geoffery Howe, Mr Kenneth Clarke, Mr Michael Hesteltine, to name but a few. Each of these have played their part in destroying the british constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
