Comments on: Why is wanting a referendum right wing?

By: thomas

thomas — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:29:47 +0000

Eddie, the Queen is worried about her own position if she became involved in such a matter, I assume. And indeed, what could be worse than to lose our Queen over the EU! That really would be the end of our nation.

By: Eddie Allen

Eddie Allen — Tue, 09 Sep 2008 06:37:26 +0000

I think having read the links [ Adrian Peirsonon 07 Sep 2008 at 5:48 pm ], a referendum of IN or OUT is a dangerous thing to do as if a yes vote came back then the no’s would be completely disenfranchised from their rights to sovereignty.

Possibly 49% of the population could have their sovereignty removed in a popular vote which is anything but popular.

Clearly you cannot “vote away” your sovereignty !!

I’d prefer William Hague to amend the 1972 Act and re-establish parliamentary sovereignty.

Also, party whip on any decisions involving international agreements should be forbidden.

He should form a committee to draft a formal British Constitution and John Redwood and Bill Cash should head that committee so it is drafted solely in the public interest.

It should be without any of the nonsense Gordon Brown plans of setting out “our responsiblities” in a document intended to set “our rights” in stone as to do that is utter nonsense and it fools nobody. Typically it is yet another Labour con to turn a constitution of rights into a document of control.

Britain needs a written constitution so we can stop any future argument about who our sovereignty belongs to.

The way I see it is the government has been given a mandate to govern for 5 years. It has not been given a mandate to sign away that responsibilty, we gave THEM the madate to do that and no other !

Sovereignty belongs to the people, we loan it to government, the Queen protects it, and if she doesn’t like a bill then she refuses to sign it and it cannot pass into law.

If the Queen is petitioned ( as she has been by many ), then it is for her to say she cannot sign it until the government has the expressed wish of the people. ( Why has she signed it when she knows this and has sworn an oath to uphold our sovereignty ) ?

The other thing I’d suggest, is that a government is held to account “to the people” on its manifesto promises. An unfulfilled promise should automatically incur a vote of confidence in the commons and should never be left to private individuals to attempt to sue the government over what is manifestly a lie or a failure by government.

Parliament needs some reform as a government cannot represent the people’s wishes if it doesn’t ask us and it isn’t held to account when it is unable or refuses to fulfill its pledge which led to it being given a mandate to govern.

By: mike stallard

mike stallard — Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:04:59 +0000

In this situation where the EU is going to steamroller through to Lisbon over the heads of the Irish polliticians who now plan to use the parliament for the vote, you might have thought the situation hopeless.
Today Open Europe (sign up if you have not already) and the Telegraph are holding a debate. So things are starting to move – the consensus is turning into a debate.
Valerie Guiscard d’Estang has also said that he is quite ready for a two speed Europe and he is the bloke who wrote (with help) the first Constitution.

Reply: he expressly told us he was not recommending a two speed Europe. I thought he was trying to stop a future UK government using the veto.

By: Matthew

Matthew — Mon, 08 Sep 2008 15:42:49 +0000

Surely a referendum needs to be on membership of the EU? The issue has dragged on in British politics for 20 years now and letting the people have their say seems right.

By: Andrew Forbes

Andrew Forbes — Mon, 08 Sep 2008 13:15:13 +0000

I’m sorry you lost. Thanks for taking the time to reply.

By: Promise of Avalon

Promise of Avalon — Mon, 08 Sep 2008 11:41:44 +0000

I am making the assumption that the Treaty will be signed by the next election, but even if it is not, the EU needs to change. How will you propose to change our relationship with the EU after the next election. Do you have any previous articles that summarise?

By: Andrew Forbes

Andrew Forbes — Mon, 08 Sep 2008 11:32:02 +0000

I’d like some sort of referendum. After all, I am a mere 41, and therefore far too young to have been given any direct say in all of this. You have to have been 18 in 1975; nobody in the UK under the age of 51 has had any direct say in the transfer of power to Europe. Even then, they were only asked to vote on an economic community.

In hindsight, the correct time for a referendum was Maastricht. Where were you then, John?

Reply: Losing the battle in Cabinet to have a referendum and to give MPs a free vote.

By: Adrian Peirson

Adrian Peirson — Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:48:29 +0000

I don’t want a Referendum, What if the Vote were Fixed, I want Full Soveriegnty restored to the British People just like it should be.
the EU is Corrupt, not having had its accounts signed off for 13 yrs, they cannot account for 80% of its Budget, it has been voted down by the French, the Dutch and now the Irish.
It is Illegal, an act of Gross Treason under Common Law, the Bill of Rights, and Magna Carta.

What exactly does it take.

We are only ever offered what they want us to choose between.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iW5kOB1pmg

The EU is Illegal under the British Constitution.
http://www.britsattheirbest.com/freedom/f_your_own_choice.htm

http://thejournal.parker-joseph.co.uk/blog/_archives/2007/10/21/3305358.html

Elizabeth Becket.
http://www.namastepublishing.co.uk/Elizabeth%20Beckett%20-%20News%20Black%20Out.htm

By: Frank Davis

Frank Davis — Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:53:41 +0000

“Reply [to Trevor Wright]: I have stated Conservative policy. I myself would go even further.”

Geoff Mortimer wrote: “Out of curiosity went to conservative.com and on the link to Policy there is currently only 7 items listed the dreaded EU is not one of them”

There was a time when there was a robust public debate in this country about Europe. Now there seems to be near-complete silence among the political classes. Is it any wonder that, in this vacuum of information, the wildest rumours flourish and gain credence?

By: Tim Almond

Tim Almond — Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:21:18 +0000

Why should anyone trust Cameron after he changed his promise on leaving the EPP from “months, not years”, to a 3 year delay?

By: HM

HM — Sun, 07 Sep 2008 10:14:06 +0000

Mr. Redwood, your party’s position on the EU is nothing more than cowardice.

“Conservatives have made clear we will give a referedum if Lisbon has not been ratified everywhere when we come to office. It seems unlikely it will have been ratified, so there will be a referendum. If by any chance it has been ratified we will be taking other actions to sort out the EU mess, as we cannot live with Lisbon, or with other parts of the accumulated Treaties and powers of the EU.”

So basically if it is ratified you’re absolutely stuffed.

Let’s look at the bigger picture here:

The CONS want to stay in the EU. They want to reform it (as if that is possible for a vast minority to achieve in the EU) and with it reformed, let’s see what changes would be made:

1. Keep open borders. (Basically immigrants will keep flooding in).
2. Europe sticks together to fight terrorism and climate change. (Why can’t independent states do that? And having open borders and fighting terrorism seems like an inherently foolish idea).
3. Give national governments a bigger say in the EU. (What does it matter? Britain can still be overruled by the other states on many issues if that happens. Independence would solve that problem and return full sovereignty to Britain which could deliver its own stance on climate change, foreign spending and terrorism and ACTUALLY legislate by itself.)
4. Still allow the EU to have massive power over making directives. (This is just stupid and still holds Britain back from its full potential by taking away its sovereignty and giving it to nearly 30 other countries and an army of bureaucrats).

So in a nutshell the CONS want a Europe that still regulates, that can still make decisions for Britain, that makes up our mind for us on terrorism, the environment and foreign spending, and that has open borders.

I mich prefer UKIP’s vision of total withdrawal from the EU, making our minds up for ourselves, closing our borders for a points-system for immigration, raising democracy in the UK and having a European Free Trade Area as well as a Commonwealth one. Where can you go wrong with that?

Sources:
http://www.europeanreform.eu/the-eu-a-new-agenda-for-the-21st-century/
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7067149.stm
http://www.conservativeeurope.com/conservatives-in-the-european-parliament.aspx

Reply: Your caricature of Conservative policy is silly, and your belief in a UKIP government soon absurd.

By: ukipwebmaster

ukipwebmaster — Sun, 07 Sep 2008 10:06:41 +0000

As Nigel said in his speech at the UKIP national conference in Bournemouth, Cameron could kill the Lisbon treaty stone dead right now by saying the right things but he refuses to do so. We know how two-faced the Tories are on this, which is why we will take everything you say with a large pinch of salt.
Reply: What nonsense. We tried to kill Lisbon the only way it can be killed here in the UK by votes in the Commons. We need more votes.

By: Tim Worstall

Tim Worstall — Sun, 07 Sep 2008 09:55:44 +0000

What slightly puzzles me is this promise only to have a referendum if Lisbon is not ratified. Why not have a referendum even if it has been ratified?

After all, 100% of the referenda that we have had on matters European have been retrospective, haven’t they?

(Disclosure, yes, I am an UKIP press officer but this is a personal comment.)

Reply: Why just vote on the Lisbon bit once it is passed if it is passed? There are other bits of the Treties we have voted against and do not want as well.

By: Promise of Avalon

Promise of Avalon — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:53:46 +0000

But what will you do to “sort out the EU Mess”? We need to see or hear something more concrete. We still remember Maastricht and the ERM. The Conservative track record suggests that not much will be done, despite sceptics like you.

By: Bazman

Bazman — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 21:17:59 +0000

WE do not pay MP’s to put the complicated political decisions on the electorate. This is why expensive referendums are wrong.

By: John Fehr

John Fehr — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:11:23 +0000

Not Lambeth, perhaps Barking. Maybe I just tend to associate Lambeth with unpleasant extremists. The principle remains.

By: geoff mortimer

geoff mortimer — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:00:55 +0000

Out of curiosity went to conservative.com and on the link to Policy there is currently only 7 items listed the dreaded EU is not one of them, neither which is of greater concern is there any mention of Defence.

By: Johnny Norfolk

Johnny Norfolk — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:58:26 +0000

We need a referendum on the EU once and for all .John Major should have had one and it was his greatest mistake not to have one.
We were lied to when we vosted to go in , in the first place. I would have voted no if it was to have what we have now.

We should sort this out once and for all.

By: John Fehr

John Fehr — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:51:17 +0000

Quote: “I seem to remember there were no elected UKIP MPs available to help us secure that referendum, and fewer Consrevatives than we needed because UKIP and others had stopped some Conservatives getting elected on the promise of a referendum.”

What a cheek! If Conservatives didn’t get elected, it was simply because not enough people wanted them. This is a bit like the BNP councillors getting elected in Lambeth (from memory) and Labour having the temerity to say that the voters got it wrong.

We should vote for whoever will represent us, regardless of their chances of getting elected – or would you suggest that nobody should vote Conservative where their candidate clearly has no chance of being elected?

I have observed the performance of UKIP. Your arrogant comment makes me even more inclined to vote for them.

By: mike stallard

mike stallard — Sat, 06 Sep 2008 19:36:20 +0000

There is no such thing as a free lunch. So what is the cost of a referendum?
The EU is not a nice place. The Irish are being forcfed into a referendum prtobably after the European Elections. The treatment of dissenters in the parliament, the forcing of journalists who film MEPs taking their unfair allowances and the non signing off of the accounts year on year, all point to a very nasty lot of people.
These people actually believe in Europe and they are terribly narrow minded. I got all this from Dan Hannan’s blogs because the deliberations are not reported and they are virtually secret.
Both of these facts mean that anyone who rocks the boat and who is not totally in favour of the European Project will be isolated.
That leaves America.
America which led us into Iraq. America which does not even consult us on Afghanistan any more.
And, now, we get all our military equipment from Europe.
It will take a very brave politician to run a referendum. I wonder, myself, if that man is David Cameron.