What Sky (in fact Boulton would not be out of place on the BBC his head is so far up Gordon’s rear end but I’m not forced by law to pay to hear his bias), Fox or Germany have absolutely nothing to do with your completely fatuous defence of the indefensible.

Thanks for any answers

Obama’s landslide victory was based and won on integrity and intelligence, publicly displayed throughout – without hatred.
He rose above the opposition’s dirty tricks and gimmicks – he wisely turned ‘the other cheek’ which placed him ‘head and shoulders’ above his opponent.

The Tories focus and policies are based on the good of our nation and electorate’s concerns. The historically dire results of Nulabor unionists self profiting rule, based on lies, and media manipulation is the reason 85% of people want a return to government based on honesty, integrity and intelligence.
David Cameron has shown integrity and intelligence throughout many vicious ‘opposition’ attacks by pro labour (unionist) biased interviewers.

Taxpayers and TV licence payers have been conned into profiting biased ‘unionists’ for years – BBC lost it’s independent status in our democracy years ago. Voters are not as stupid as Nulabor presumes …… public head to head debates always sorts the ‘truth from the lies and spin’ – as Obama (and Cameron to date) have overwhelmingly shown and confirmed.

The Today programme was not lying it was merely reinforcing what David Cameron announced a few days’ earlier regarding his public spending cuts. His announcement was covered by all the main news channels not just the BBC. Indeed Channel 4 News dedicated 15 minutes of air time to this very issue.

Maybe what concerns John Redwood is the wide gulf his leader’s message created between Labour and Conservative public spending policies. Such a chasm makes it easier for the electorate to see which political party operates in their best interests.

There’s no BBC bias, there’s only Tory paranoia in having a leader who’s rating in tumbling when it should be growing!

Reply: not so – try reading what the Conservative leadership said for a change

1) When I last looked every one of us had a choice whether or not to buy any newspaper. Don’t like the Daily Mail = don’t buy it, don’t like the BBC = tough pay up or go to jail..

2) BBC programming has advertisements between every programme, albeit for their own programmes, and usually completely unnecessary digital channels.

And as for the “may or may not be bias(ed)” – give me a break, the only reason Vince Cable is a permanent fixture on BBC political programmes is because he can be guaranteed to criticise the Tories whilst completely ignoring the party that actually got us into this mess.

Anyway are you moving up to Manchester with the rest of your BBC chums? Got a really good apartment available with stunning views of the pennines……..

Yes. We ought to scrutinize carefully where else the BBC receives funding from, for example the EBR&D.

I like Stewarts suggestion put forward a few days ago. First act of an incoming Tory administration. A one line bill.

“The BBC licence fee is abolished.”

Let the BBC sort its own affairs out from then on.

What are the Tories going to do about the BBC. The very least they should do is to promise the return to impartial reports and a clear spilt between news and views.

There is a massive difference between cuts and a reduction in the rate of spending.

For those at the BBC who do not understand.

A cut is if you spend £100 last year and propose £95 this

A reduced increase is that you were going to spend £110 but now it £105.

Its still an increase on the £100 but less than was planned.
This information is for the BBC not others that read this blog so pleae forgive me.

If anyone cannot see the need for this. Then heaven help us.

What will Polly say this time ?