<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: THE BUDGET</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/22/the-budget/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/22/the-budget/</link>
	<description>Conservative Party Member of Parliament for Wokingham</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 13:47:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Strikes In England Schools Possible After £200m Budget Cuts</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/22/the-budget/#comment-37636</link>
		<dc:creator>Strikes In England Schools Possible After £200m Budget Cuts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 12:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3466#comment-37636</guid>
		<description>[...] THE BUDGET &#124; John Redwood MP [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] THE BUDGET | John Redwood MP [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/22/the-budget/#comment-36687</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3466#comment-36687</guid>
		<description>As ive said many times before on here....just as sterling looks like its recovering - another bout of serial economic terrorism from the Chancellor and his puppet master. The reasons for the wildly excessive borrowing are clear for all to see. Wildly optimistic growth forecasts which have failed to materialise coupled with an insane policy of spending totally out of proportion to our ability to pay....if this on its own is not a reason for the chancellor to step down - I dont know what is. And these people were lashing out at private sector analysts about their failure to assess things correctly. The Chancellor in giving such nonsensical growth forecasts last year (way out of line with consensus estimates) was effectively fabricating information to justify spending plans / investments. In the same way as private sector analysts fabricated information regarding the viability of residential mortgage portfolios.  To me there is no difference. Whilst others may differ on that - what is certain is the degree of incompetence and denial that so characterises this excuse for a government. The Chancellor could have opted to give a more cautious budget - review spending, announce savings - drop unnecessary projects, that may have calmed market fears  - but no - we have yet more borrowing and spending. This is about competence - and accountability and it is clear to me that if democracy can allow this much devastation to be wrought upon a populous effectively unhindered by opposition - it is of little use as a form of organising our nation. We have a term by term dictatorship - with no effective opposition due to the skew between parliamentary seats and popular vote. Even if a few parties got together they could not unhinge this government. The most important lesson of this whole episode is that as taxpayers we should never allow ourselves to be put in such a position again - the economic rape of our nation continues unhindered. We should demand the right to vote on matters of national importance and interest. We should demand the right to hold an election if any government threatens the nation in the way this government has done. We should demand some objective criteria regarding borrowing / spending limits - irrespective of who is in government. Instead we just have to sit as suffer in silence as decades of hard work and saving by many generations is needlessly squandered to satisfy the ego of the self-installed dictator and the wishes of his friends, the bondholders. It is indeed a bitter pill to swallow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As ive said many times before on here&#8230;.just as sterling looks like its recovering &#8211; another bout of serial economic terrorism from the Chancellor and his puppet master. The reasons for the wildly excessive borrowing are clear for all to see. Wildly optimistic growth forecasts which have failed to materialise coupled with an insane policy of spending totally out of proportion to our ability to pay&#8230;.if this on its own is not a reason for the chancellor to step down &#8211; I dont know what is. And these people were lashing out at private sector analysts about their failure to assess things correctly. The Chancellor in giving such nonsensical growth forecasts last year (way out of line with consensus estimates) was effectively fabricating information to justify spending plans / investments. In the same way as private sector analysts fabricated information regarding the viability of residential mortgage portfolios.  To me there is no difference. Whilst others may differ on that &#8211; what is certain is the degree of incompetence and denial that so characterises this excuse for a government. The Chancellor could have opted to give a more cautious budget &#8211; review spending, announce savings &#8211; drop unnecessary projects, that may have calmed market fears  &#8211; but no &#8211; we have yet more borrowing and spending. This is about competence &#8211; and accountability and it is clear to me that if democracy can allow this much devastation to be wrought upon a populous effectively unhindered by opposition &#8211; it is of little use as a form of organising our nation. We have a term by term dictatorship &#8211; with no effective opposition due to the skew between parliamentary seats and popular vote. Even if a few parties got together they could not unhinge this government. The most important lesson of this whole episode is that as taxpayers we should never allow ourselves to be put in such a position again &#8211; the economic rape of our nation continues unhindered. We should demand the right to vote on matters of national importance and interest. We should demand the right to hold an election if any government threatens the nation in the way this government has done. We should demand some objective criteria regarding borrowing / spending limits &#8211; irrespective of who is in government. Instead we just have to sit as suffer in silence as decades of hard work and saving by many generations is needlessly squandered to satisfy the ego of the self-installed dictator and the wishes of his friends, the bondholders. It is indeed a bitter pill to swallow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Peirson</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/22/the-budget/#comment-36680</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Peirson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3466#comment-36680</guid>
		<description>I never saw your speech Mr Redwood, but it seems to have gone down well, maybe yourself or a &#039;fan&#039; should start up a Youtube channel.

Sadly, many people do not understand Money, I myself am NOT an economist, I&#039;m an engineer but I believe it is no accident that such an important subject is not taught in school, I think the reason is precisely because whoever controls the money supply, really controls the Nation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never saw your speech Mr Redwood, but it seems to have gone down well, maybe yourself or a &#8216;fan&#8217; should start up a Youtube channel.</p>
<p>Sadly, many people do not understand Money, I myself am NOT an economist, I&#8217;m an engineer but I believe it is no accident that such an important subject is not taught in school, I think the reason is precisely because whoever controls the money supply, really controls the Nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJB</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/22/the-budget/#comment-36671</link>
		<dc:creator>SJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3466#comment-36671</guid>
		<description>Matthew: &quot;We could ...  cut our EU contributions until their accounts are signed off.&quot;

My understanding is that if the NAO adopted the same procedure as the Court of Auditors, HMG&#039;s accounts would also fail to be &quot;signed off.&quot;
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldselect/ldeucom/270/27010.htm (see para 149)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matthew: &#8220;We could &#8230;  cut our EU contributions until their accounts are signed off.&#8221;</p>
<p>My understanding is that if the NAO adopted the same procedure as the Court of Auditors, HMG&#8217;s accounts would also fail to be &#8220;signed off.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldselect/ldeucom/270/27010.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldselect/ldeucom/270/27010.htm</a> (see para 149)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Phillips</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/22/the-budget/#comment-36670</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Phillips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3466#comment-36670</guid>
		<description>By a know nothing Government</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By a know nothing Government</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Reynolds</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/22/the-budget/#comment-36642</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Reynolds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3466#comment-36642</guid>
		<description>What the government ought to have done is to have slashed public expenditure plans by £60 billion over five years to balance the books. Quango&#039;s, Incapacity Benefit,ID Cards, Barnet Formula,RDA&#039;s , public sector pay &amp; pensions, New Deal, Whitehall consultancy waste, public sector procurement and tax credits &amp; housing benefit should be the main targets &amp; state sector payroll needs to be far less. We could say good riddance to the Business &amp; Culture Departments and cut our EU contributions until their accounts are signed off.

VAT could rise by 5% to 22.5% to fund a £25 billion public debt reduction in 2010-11.

The overall impact of spending cuts of £60 billion &amp; a £25 billion tax hike will be to cut the budget deficit from  a projected £97 billion in 2013-14 to £12 billion. Any rise in the dole queues caused by cutting government jobs could be offset by merging Job Seekers Allowance &amp; Incapacity Benefit into one payment designed to slash economic inactivity. By allowing small &amp; medium sized businesses to opt out of a vast number of regulations you could spur economic growth &amp; create the jobs needed for all those doing either non-jobs in Brown&#039;s client state  or who are economically inactive. This will help get unemployment down sooner and public debt would be under control.

Axing the tripartite system , giving the Bank of England back its lost powers , making the inflation target 2% on RPI-x ( more accurate &amp; rigorous than CPI ) and ensuring that MPC members can only serve seven year fixed non-renewable terms to ensure stability &amp; limit political meddling in monetary policy. Bank shares ought to be sold to fund boosting the reserves as a prudent policy &amp; the Bank of England must have the power to curb bank lending if asset prices &amp; credit levels get out of hand. Bank lending levels can permitted to rise once those problems are resolved.

The 50p band on incomes exceeding £150,000 p/a is mad because the rich will just use their accountants to get as much of their money declared as capital gains meaning that they wont pay tax at 40p let alone 50p - rather the rich will pay 18p tax ( that is 10% less than the 20p basic rate that most of us pay). It is hardly fairer taxation from a government that cannot decide if it is New Labour with a pro-enterprise 18% CGT flat rate or Old Labour with a 50% top rate of tax. When it comes to tax Labour seem not to have much of a clue as far as principle is concerned. 

A budget like that would have paved the way for recovery - the new top rate would only raise £2 billion ( owing to brain drain , diminished GDP growth , increased avoidance etc). The £2 billion could be found from just cutting EU contributions still further or from less for farmers who would gain from less red tape if we pulled out of the Common Agriculture Policy. Axing the 50p rate to avoid long-term economic damage is just sound sense -RIP New Labour. The rise in the national debt is bad for our economic competitiveness as David Davis wisely said in his remarks in the budget debate today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the government ought to have done is to have slashed public expenditure plans by £60 billion over five years to balance the books. Quango&#8217;s, Incapacity Benefit,ID Cards, Barnet Formula,RDA&#8217;s , public sector pay &amp; pensions, New Deal, Whitehall consultancy waste, public sector procurement and tax credits &amp; housing benefit should be the main targets &amp; state sector payroll needs to be far less. We could say good riddance to the Business &amp; Culture Departments and cut our EU contributions until their accounts are signed off.</p>
<p>VAT could rise by 5% to 22.5% to fund a £25 billion public debt reduction in 2010-11.</p>
<p>The overall impact of spending cuts of £60 billion &amp; a £25 billion tax hike will be to cut the budget deficit from  a projected £97 billion in 2013-14 to £12 billion. Any rise in the dole queues caused by cutting government jobs could be offset by merging Job Seekers Allowance &amp; Incapacity Benefit into one payment designed to slash economic inactivity. By allowing small &amp; medium sized businesses to opt out of a vast number of regulations you could spur economic growth &amp; create the jobs needed for all those doing either non-jobs in Brown&#8217;s client state  or who are economically inactive. This will help get unemployment down sooner and public debt would be under control.</p>
<p>Axing the tripartite system , giving the Bank of England back its lost powers , making the inflation target 2% on RPI-x ( more accurate &amp; rigorous than CPI ) and ensuring that MPC members can only serve seven year fixed non-renewable terms to ensure stability &amp; limit political meddling in monetary policy. Bank shares ought to be sold to fund boosting the reserves as a prudent policy &amp; the Bank of England must have the power to curb bank lending if asset prices &amp; credit levels get out of hand. Bank lending levels can permitted to rise once those problems are resolved.</p>
<p>The 50p band on incomes exceeding £150,000 p/a is mad because the rich will just use their accountants to get as much of their money declared as capital gains meaning that they wont pay tax at 40p let alone 50p &#8211; rather the rich will pay 18p tax ( that is 10% less than the 20p basic rate that most of us pay). It is hardly fairer taxation from a government that cannot decide if it is New Labour with a pro-enterprise 18% CGT flat rate or Old Labour with a 50% top rate of tax. When it comes to tax Labour seem not to have much of a clue as far as principle is concerned. </p>
<p>A budget like that would have paved the way for recovery &#8211; the new top rate would only raise £2 billion ( owing to brain drain , diminished GDP growth , increased avoidance etc). The £2 billion could be found from just cutting EU contributions still further or from less for farmers who would gain from less red tape if we pulled out of the Common Agriculture Policy. Axing the 50p rate to avoid long-term economic damage is just sound sense -RIP New Labour. The rise in the national debt is bad for our economic competitiveness as David Davis wisely said in his remarks in the budget debate today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank O'Gorman</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/22/the-budget/#comment-36637</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank O'Gorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3466#comment-36637</guid>
		<description>Please send me a copy of your budget speech. I thought it was very interesting

Reply: it was off the cuff, so there is no text. I will get a Hansard record soon and post that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please send me a copy of your budget speech. I thought it was very interesting</p>
<p>Reply: it was off the cuff, so there is no text. I will get a Hansard record soon and post that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: figurewizard</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/22/the-budget/#comment-36633</link>
		<dc:creator>figurewizard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3466#comment-36633</guid>
		<description>Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling got last year&#039;s forecasts spectacularly wrong for the same reason that they are going to be wrong this time. They couldn&#039;t disguise the level of spending and therefore debt over the next two years, so they ran it through their model and then worked out the percentage increase of growth required to at least mitigate the awfulness of the resulting figures. That&#039;s where 1.2 % growth in 2010 and 3.5% in 2011 have come from.

It&#039;s a stratagem employed by dodgy businesses when they are desperate to get the bank to bail them out with more cash. The bond markets may not turn out to be so gullible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gordon Brown and Alistair Darling got last year&#8217;s forecasts spectacularly wrong for the same reason that they are going to be wrong this time. They couldn&#8217;t disguise the level of spending and therefore debt over the next two years, so they ran it through their model and then worked out the percentage increase of growth required to at least mitigate the awfulness of the resulting figures. That&#8217;s where 1.2 % growth in 2010 and 3.5% in 2011 have come from.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a stratagem employed by dodgy businesses when they are desperate to get the bank to bail them out with more cash. The bond markets may not turn out to be so gullible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikestallard</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/22/the-budget/#comment-36627</link>
		<dc:creator>mikestallard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3466#comment-36627</guid>
		<description>Your forecast, once again, was completely right.
I only saw a bit of Mr Cameron&#039;s speech and, yes, when he sat down he looked angry. At last!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your forecast, once again, was completely right.<br />
I only saw a bit of Mr Cameron&#8217;s speech and, yes, when he sat down he looked angry. At last!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff.</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/22/the-budget/#comment-36615</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3466#comment-36615</guid>
		<description>It strikes me that Mr Darling&#039;s budget was little more than a series of traps for the Conservatives for when we get into government.
I watched the &quot;Stepford Robot&quot; Yvette Cooper doing the TV news rounds; She looked very uncomfortable and to me, appeared to not really believe what she was saying. Even Al-Beeb appeared to question her more robustly than normal. Perhaps Al-Beeb have at last got the message that Labour&#039;s days are numbered and they will soon have to rely on the party they have rubbished, for the last eleven years, for their future funding. 

This budget seems to be too little too late and will make little difference to most people, well other than cost us all a few bob!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It strikes me that Mr Darling&#8217;s budget was little more than a series of traps for the Conservatives for when we get into government.<br />
I watched the &#8220;Stepford Robot&#8221; Yvette Cooper doing the TV news rounds; She looked very uncomfortable and to me, appeared to not really believe what she was saying. Even Al-Beeb appeared to question her more robustly than normal. Perhaps Al-Beeb have at last got the message that Labour&#8217;s days are numbered and they will soon have to rely on the party they have rubbished, for the last eleven years, for their future funding. </p>
<p>This budget seems to be too little too late and will make little difference to most people, well other than cost us all a few bob!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/22/the-budget/#comment-36614</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3466#comment-36614</guid>
		<description>Mr Redwood - excellent post budget speech in the House today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr Redwood &#8211; excellent post budget speech in the House today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stewart Cowan</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/22/the-budget/#comment-36613</link>
		<dc:creator>Stewart Cowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3466#comment-36613</guid>
		<description>Hello. I&#039;m not a member of any party, but I did enjoy your contribution via parliamentlive.tv a short time ago.

And yes, what a good time to ditch the ID card scheme (not that there wasn&#039;t ever a good time!)

How much could we save by leaving the EU altogether?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello. I&#8217;m not a member of any party, but I did enjoy your contribution via parliamentlive.tv a short time ago.</p>
<p>And yes, what a good time to ditch the ID card scheme (not that there wasn&#8217;t ever a good time!)</p>
<p>How much could we save by leaving the EU altogether?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Tubb</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/22/the-budget/#comment-36612</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Tubb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3466#comment-36612</guid>
		<description>The deficit is £175 Billion. 

Or to put it another way the government is spending £20 Million per hour, that it doesn&#039;t have.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The deficit is £175 Billion. </p>
<p>Or to put it another way the government is spending £20 Million per hour, that it doesn&#8217;t have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Cole</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/22/the-budget/#comment-36611</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3466#comment-36611</guid>
		<description>Congratulations on your speech on the Budget this afternoon in Parliament.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations on your speech on the Budget this afternoon in Parliament.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/22/the-budget/#comment-36609</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3466#comment-36609</guid>
		<description>What an appalling budget. No end to the squandering of tax payers money, unimaginable amounts of borrowing ( even using Labours figures) and a nasty little political tax rise to 50 % to keep the lefty vote onside and make the Tories look like rich list supporters if they oppose it.


Vote of no confidence soon please, let&#039;s get them out and start on the rebuilding .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an appalling budget. No end to the squandering of tax payers money, unimaginable amounts of borrowing ( even using Labours figures) and a nasty little political tax rise to 50 % to keep the lefty vote onside and make the Tories look like rich list supporters if they oppose it.</p>
<p>Vote of no confidence soon please, let&#8217;s get them out and start on the rebuilding .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Demetrius</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/22/the-budget/#comment-36608</link>
		<dc:creator>Demetrius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3466#comment-36608</guid>
		<description>It is bad out there, and getting worse.  In the USA the annual tax bills are giving payers unpleasant shocks, notably the State and local imposts.  In the EU the strains are showing.  In the UK the private sector is coming under siege.  This morning on the M20 there were more Hungarian trucks that UK ones and a lot more Polish than Hungarian.  There were numbers both from elsewhere in the Balkans, and the East.  All to add to the usual numbers from the Low Countries, Germany and Spain. This has become the norm in the past year.  So who will pay the bills?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is bad out there, and getting worse.  In the USA the annual tax bills are giving payers unpleasant shocks, notably the State and local imposts.  In the EU the strains are showing.  In the UK the private sector is coming under siege.  This morning on the M20 there were more Hungarian trucks that UK ones and a lot more Polish than Hungarian.  There were numbers both from elsewhere in the Balkans, and the East.  All to add to the usual numbers from the Low Countries, Germany and Spain. This has become the norm in the past year.  So who will pay the bills?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D K McGREGOR</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/22/the-budget/#comment-36607</link>
		<dc:creator>D K McGREGOR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3466#comment-36607</guid>
		<description>The Budget has been delivered .Well, was that it?  There is no substance to this budget at all , what is there that acknowledges that we are in , today , the grimmest financial situation for generations.
I find it maddening that this bunch of rogues can keep putting off the inevitable belt tightening to some point in the future , probably under a different government who will have to take the rap and do the necessary fixing.
The blatant politicking of the public / private divide is evil and only confirms my thoughts that we need rid of these incompetents  ,pronto!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Budget has been delivered .Well, was that it?  There is no substance to this budget at all , what is there that acknowledges that we are in , today , the grimmest financial situation for generations.<br />
I find it maddening that this bunch of rogues can keep putting off the inevitable belt tightening to some point in the future , probably under a different government who will have to take the rap and do the necessary fixing.<br />
The blatant politicking of the public / private divide is evil and only confirms my thoughts that we need rid of these incompetents  ,pronto!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/22/the-budget/#comment-36606</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3466#comment-36606</guid>
		<description>John: I&#039;m intrigued as to what your thoughts are. If the govt. had allowed several of the banks to just collapse, huge numbers of people wouldn&#039;t be able to take their money out or go about their business. The country would have just come to a halt!

Reply: Yes - I said lend them as little as possible for as short a time as possible to see them through, but do not subsidise them and do not buy their shares.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John: I&#8217;m intrigued as to what your thoughts are. If the govt. had allowed several of the banks to just collapse, huge numbers of people wouldn&#8217;t be able to take their money out or go about their business. The country would have just come to a halt!</p>
<p>Reply: Yes &#8211; I said lend them as little as possible for as short a time as possible to see them through, but do not subsidise them and do not buy their shares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/22/the-budget/#comment-36603</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3466#comment-36603</guid>
		<description>A DO NOTHING BUDGET.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A DO NOTHING BUDGET.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Edward</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/04/22/the-budget/#comment-36601</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Edward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3466#comment-36601</guid>
		<description>I agree, the budget is as predictable and will be as politically poisoned as the economic fantasy land of our sham Prime Minister and his puppet Chancellor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, the budget is as predictable and will be as politically poisoned as the economic fantasy land of our sham Prime Minister and his puppet Chancellor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
