<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Public spending  &#8211; 20% off?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/05/11/public-spending-20-off/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/05/11/public-spending-20-off/</link>
	<description>Conservative Party Candidate for Wokingham</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 14:43:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fred Quangp</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/05/11/public-spending-20-off/#comment-41918</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Quangp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 19:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3646#comment-41918</guid>
		<description>John, I hear SEEDA are now sacking staff, but unfortunately the waste does not stop there.  In traditional Labour style, the QUANGOcrats are being allowed to carry over years of service from other local Government bodies which is resulting in some massive pay offs. This should be stopped now, and only the statutory minimum paid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John, I hear SEEDA are now sacking staff, but unfortunately the waste does not stop there.  In traditional Labour style, the QUANGOcrats are being allowed to carry over years of service from other local Government bodies which is resulting in some massive pay offs. This should be stopped now, and only the statutory minimum paid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Fairney</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/05/11/public-spending-20-off/#comment-38108</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Fairney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 06:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3646#comment-38108</guid>
		<description>You would be quite amazed how fast the private sector can recover if it was left alone and untaxed.  Lets consider facts.

All state jobs are funded by sucking wealth out of the productive part of the economy.  Ergo, cut these and more cash is available to actually increase wealth.  Sure there wil be dislocation, but state jobs are not created in the &quot;magic money bag&quot;  State spending comes from somewhere and it would go elsewhere (such as making credit available to companies instead of the government hogging it all). 

And it&#039;s not like we have much of a choice to be honest, unless the Weimar republic beckons, and that didn&#039;t really end well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You would be quite amazed how fast the private sector can recover if it was left alone and untaxed.  Lets consider facts.</p>
<p>All state jobs are funded by sucking wealth out of the productive part of the economy.  Ergo, cut these and more cash is available to actually increase wealth.  Sure there wil be dislocation, but state jobs are not created in the &#8220;magic money bag&#8221;  State spending comes from somewhere and it would go elsewhere (such as making credit available to companies instead of the government hogging it all). </p>
<p>And it&#8217;s not like we have much of a choice to be honest, unless the Weimar republic beckons, and that didn&#8217;t really end well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MP’s Expenses – Being Machiavellian to tackle the bigger financial issues &#171; Manicbeancounter&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/05/11/public-spending-20-off/#comment-38103</link>
		<dc:creator>MP’s Expenses – Being Machiavellian to tackle the bigger financial issues &#171; Manicbeancounter&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 22:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3646#comment-38103</guid>
		<description>[...] bigger financial&#160;issues 2009 May 12    by manicbeancounter   Yesterday I wrote a comment on John Redwood’s blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bigger financial&nbsp;issues 2009 May 12    by manicbeancounter   Yesterday I wrote a comment on John Redwood’s blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis Cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/05/11/public-spending-20-off/#comment-38098</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 20:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3646#comment-38098</guid>
		<description>If modern communication methods solved everything, there&#039;d be no reason to stop at 150,000, would there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If modern communication methods solved everything, there&#8217;d be no reason to stop at 150,000, would there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ManicBeancounter</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/05/11/public-spending-20-off/#comment-38095</link>
		<dc:creator>ManicBeancounter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 18:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3646#comment-38095</guid>
		<description>Your comment about Cameron demanding that money should be paid back is valid, and is exactly what Cameron has done today. However, Cameron has broadly followed my line. Draw a line in the sand to those who recognise their error and move on. To do as you suggest - essentially sack those the toffs, or those you dislike - is poor leadership. 
Political parties are essentially coalitions, and the leaders need to keep a large range of people on board. 
  As John Redwood has stated, the Conservatives in power will have much bigger battles to wage. Today Cameron has shown he can fight those battles much more effectively than the current Prime Minister.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comment about Cameron demanding that money should be paid back is valid, and is exactly what Cameron has done today. However, Cameron has broadly followed my line. Draw a line in the sand to those who recognise their error and move on. To do as you suggest &#8211; essentially sack those the toffs, or those you dislike &#8211; is poor leadership.<br />
Political parties are essentially coalitions, and the leaders need to keep a large range of people on board.<br />
  As John Redwood has stated, the Conservatives in power will have much bigger battles to wage. Today Cameron has shown he can fight those battles much more effectively than the current Prime Minister.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ManicBeancounter</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/05/11/public-spending-20-off/#comment-38089</link>
		<dc:creator>ManicBeancounter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 18:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3646#comment-38089</guid>
		<description>I profoundly disagree with your comment. I believe that in politics, as in other areas, you should give people a chance to make amends and move on. This is what David Cameron has done today, setting a precedent for the government to follow. 
If we start an inquisition it will go on for months. At this time when we need better government to sort out the economic mess we are in, not to turn parliament into a Roman Circus to watch good people being thrown to the lions.
Further, most MPs have acted within the existing rules. They have not &quot;stolen&quot; money, but that have acted dishonourably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I profoundly disagree with your comment. I believe that in politics, as in other areas, you should give people a chance to make amends and move on. This is what David Cameron has done today, setting a precedent for the government to follow.<br />
If we start an inquisition it will go on for months. At this time when we need better government to sort out the economic mess we are in, not to turn parliament into a Roman Circus to watch good people being thrown to the lions.<br />
Further, most MPs have acted within the existing rules. They have not &#8220;stolen&#8221; money, but that have acted dishonourably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/05/11/public-spending-20-off/#comment-38058</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 09:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3646#comment-38058</guid>
		<description>&quot;The first 10% off public spending could be painless for the public and popular.&quot;

I think you&#039;ve just demonstrated why the Tories will be a disaster, once again, in government. Everyone in the public sector - including doctors, nurses and teachers should fear a Tory government and losing their jobs.

Reply: try reading what I write and understand the figures. No nurse, doctor, teacher is at risk from the Tories and to say otherwise is a typical Labour lie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The first 10% off public spending could be painless for the public and popular.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;ve just demonstrated why the Tories will be a disaster, once again, in government. Everyone in the public sector &#8211; including doctors, nurses and teachers should fear a Tory government and losing their jobs.</p>
<p>Reply: try reading what I write and understand the figures. No nurse, doctor, teacher is at risk from the Tories and to say otherwise is a typical Labour lie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna W</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/05/11/public-spending-20-off/#comment-38050</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 08:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3646#comment-38050</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but it is going to need much more than punishment of the 3 worst offenders.  

This is Cameron&#039;s chance to clear the Party of the Old Guard - the Squire-ocracy who have no understanding of &#039;normal&#039; peoples&#039; lives.

If he let&#039;s them get away with claiming expenses for swimming pools, moats, chandeliers, horse-manure (how apt); domestic servants etc ..... then the Tory Party will sink like a stone.

He should be demanding they all pay back the money they have mis-appropriated, seek resignations - and if they&#039;re not forthcoming, withdraw the Whip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but it is going to need much more than punishment of the 3 worst offenders.  </p>
<p>This is Cameron&#8217;s chance to clear the Party of the Old Guard &#8211; the Squire-ocracy who have no understanding of &#8216;normal&#8217; peoples&#8217; lives.</p>
<p>If he let&#8217;s them get away with claiming expenses for swimming pools, moats, chandeliers, horse-manure (how apt); domestic servants etc &#8230;.. then the Tory Party will sink like a stone.</p>
<p>He should be demanding they all pay back the money they have mis-appropriated, seek resignations &#8211; and if they&#8217;re not forthcoming, withdraw the Whip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna W</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/05/11/public-spending-20-off/#comment-38047</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 08:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3646#comment-38047</guid>
		<description>The average constituency consists of around 80,000 people.  MPs don&#039;t go knocking on doors .... I have lived in Mole Valley for 16 yeaers and never once met mine.

Constituency sizes were set in the days before email; before most constituents even had cars.  With modern communication methods, there is no reason whatsoever why Constituency sizes couldn&#039;t be increased to an average of 120,000 or even 150,000 people.

If the next Parliament is going to be demanding austerity from the rest of us and cutbacks in Public Spending ..... all entirely necessary .... then it should start with Parliament.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The average constituency consists of around 80,000 people.  MPs don&#8217;t go knocking on doors &#8230;. I have lived in Mole Valley for 16 yeaers and never once met mine.</p>
<p>Constituency sizes were set in the days before email; before most constituents even had cars.  With modern communication methods, there is no reason whatsoever why Constituency sizes couldn&#8217;t be increased to an average of 120,000 or even 150,000 people.</p>
<p>If the next Parliament is going to be demanding austerity from the rest of us and cutbacks in Public Spending &#8230;.. all entirely necessary &#8230;. then it should start with Parliament.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis Cooper</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/05/11/public-spending-20-off/#comment-38045</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis Cooper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 08:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3646#comment-38045</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not a case of &quot;the wise government&quot;. It&#039;s a case of a bloody stupid, wasteful, government having got us into a dire position, but of having to proceed from where we are, not from where we would like to be. It isn&#039;t possible to redeploy about 8% of the labour force from work that is funded by the taxpayer to work that is not funded by the taxpayer, except over a period of at least five years; so do you really want to just add all those millions, and some more, to the dole queue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a case of &#8220;the wise government&#8221;. It&#8217;s a case of a bloody stupid, wasteful, government having got us into a dire position, but of having to proceed from where we are, not from where we would like to be. It isn&#8217;t possible to redeploy about 8% of the labour force from work that is funded by the taxpayer to work that is not funded by the taxpayer, except over a period of at least five years; so do you really want to just add all those millions, and some more, to the dole queue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynne Gill</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/05/11/public-spending-20-off/#comment-38025</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynne Gill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 06:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3646#comment-38025</guid>
		<description>If you think the furore over MPs&#039; expenses is a mere distraction you have no idea of the outrage felt by the rest of the population. Removing the party whip and asking for admissions and apologies from these miscreants is only the beginning of the process.

Their behaviour is morally repellent and conniving, and in many cases criminal - but I guess it&#039;s going to be deemed &#039;not in the public interest to prosecute&#039;, eh?

The very least they should be expected to do is pay back what they have stolen from the tax-payers pockets. How about putting their ill-gotten gains into a fund for, oh, lets say refurbishing the almost-slums some of our service personnel are living in, between putting their lives in danger at the behest of these gross pieces of work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think the furore over MPs&#8217; expenses is a mere distraction you have no idea of the outrage felt by the rest of the population. Removing the party whip and asking for admissions and apologies from these miscreants is only the beginning of the process.</p>
<p>Their behaviour is morally repellent and conniving, and in many cases criminal &#8211; but I guess it&#8217;s going to be deemed &#8216;not in the public interest to prosecute&#8217;, eh?</p>
<p>The very least they should be expected to do is pay back what they have stolen from the tax-payers pockets. How about putting their ill-gotten gains into a fund for, oh, lets say refurbishing the almost-slums some of our service personnel are living in, between putting their lives in danger at the behest of these gross pieces of work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MPs Expenses &#8211; Cameron should be Machiavellian &#171; Manicbeancounter&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/05/11/public-spending-20-off/#comment-38021</link>
		<dc:creator>MPs Expenses &#8211; Cameron should be Machiavellian &#171; Manicbeancounter&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 22:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3646#comment-38021</guid>
		<description>[...] MPs Expenses &#8211; Cameron should be&#160;Machiavellian 2009 May 11    by manicbeancounter   Just posted the following comment to John Redwood&#8217;s Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] MPs Expenses &#8211; Cameron should be&nbsp;Machiavellian 2009 May 11    by manicbeancounter   Just posted the following comment to John Redwood&#8217;s Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ManicBeancounter</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/05/11/public-spending-20-off/#comment-38020</link>
		<dc:creator>ManicBeancounter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 22:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3646#comment-38020</guid>
		<description>MPs Expenses are (highly symbolic) distraction. If each MPs cost us £300k each, 650 MPs cost £195m, or 0.03% of total government expenditure. A 50% saving on MPs cost will be less than 0.1% of the total we need to save. We should be Machiavellian in this. David Cameron should remove the party Whip from the 3 worst offenders (according defined criteria, including failure to recognize their waywardness), forgive the rest (after appropriate admissions and apologies) and move on. That would set a clear precedent for the Prime Minister to follow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MPs Expenses are (highly symbolic) distraction. If each MPs cost us £300k each, 650 MPs cost £195m, or 0.03% of total government expenditure. A 50% saving on MPs cost will be less than 0.1% of the total we need to save. We should be Machiavellian in this. David Cameron should remove the party Whip from the 3 worst offenders (according defined criteria, including failure to recognize their waywardness), forgive the rest (after appropriate admissions and apologies) and move on. That would set a clear precedent for the Prime Minister to follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ManicBeancounter</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/05/11/public-spending-20-off/#comment-38019</link>
		<dc:creator>ManicBeancounter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 22:18:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3646#comment-38019</guid>
		<description>Public expenditure cuts of 10% or 20% are not that easy.
Three major components of costs are
1) Transfer payments (pensions &amp; other benefits)
2) Salaries
3) Subsidies and Regional Grants

I suggest that cutting transfer payments is difficult - you would raise the shout of hurting the poorest (even when removing benefits from people on median income). Cutting the payroll of the biggest employers (NHS &amp; Education) is also problematic when one goes beyond a few administrators. Cutting regional grants (even though they are a waste of money) is politically tricky (though the Tories have less votes to lose than Labour on this one)

The major changes are long-term. A pay freeze, reduction in pension obligations and abolition of many quangos. But most of all, what is required is a fundamental change of attitude to government. It most be from the Socialist sole-provider of uniformity, to a financier of pluralistic solutions. The NHS &amp; Education should be the biggest and first candidates for this.

Finally, we should look at the productivity of the state sector, and the effectiveness of the provision.

Reply: Cutting transfer payments can be easy than you suggest - by cutting them only for future applicants, not present recipients. Cutting business grants is the easiest,as these are very unpopular with all the competitior businesses not receiving them. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Public expenditure cuts of 10% or 20% are not that easy.<br />
Three major components of costs are<br />
1) Transfer payments (pensions &amp; other benefits)<br />
2) Salaries<br />
3) Subsidies and Regional Grants</p>
<p>I suggest that cutting transfer payments is difficult &#8211; you would raise the shout of hurting the poorest (even when removing benefits from people on median income). Cutting the payroll of the biggest employers (NHS &amp; Education) is also problematic when one goes beyond a few administrators. Cutting regional grants (even though they are a waste of money) is politically tricky (though the Tories have less votes to lose than Labour on this one)</p>
<p>The major changes are long-term. A pay freeze, reduction in pension obligations and abolition of many quangos. But most of all, what is required is a fundamental change of attitude to government. It most be from the Socialist sole-provider of uniformity, to a financier of pluralistic solutions. The NHS &amp; Education should be the biggest and first candidates for this.</p>
<p>Finally, we should look at the productivity of the state sector, and the effectiveness of the provision.</p>
<p>Reply: Cutting transfer payments can be easy than you suggest &#8211; by cutting them only for future applicants, not present recipients. Cutting business grants is the easiest,as these are very unpopular with all the competitior businesses not receiving them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan jutson</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/05/11/public-spending-20-off/#comment-38016</link>
		<dc:creator>alan jutson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 20:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3646#comment-38016</guid>
		<description>Big Government is all about Manipulation of the Country&#039;s finances and manipulation of its people.

It breeds State reliance which is what the present Prime Minister (a closet Commumist) wishes for as many people as possible, that is why I am convinced everything is made as complicated and as expensive and inefficient as possible.

The problem that he is now finding out, is that there are now too few people who are creating real wealth to pay for it all. 

Hence we print money and borrow future tax revenue</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big Government is all about Manipulation of the Country&#8217;s finances and manipulation of its people.</p>
<p>It breeds State reliance which is what the present Prime Minister (a closet Commumist) wishes for as many people as possible, that is why I am convinced everything is made as complicated and as expensive and inefficient as possible.</p>
<p>The problem that he is now finding out, is that there are now too few people who are creating real wealth to pay for it all. </p>
<p>Hence we print money and borrow future tax revenue</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grytpype-thynne</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/05/11/public-spending-20-off/#comment-38015</link>
		<dc:creator>Grytpype-thynne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 20:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3646#comment-38015</guid>
		<description>You have cut through the obfuscation with a scalpel.Cut the public sector by 20%.Your leader would have immense public backing if he had the courage to announce this as his economic policy.Most of us are practising this in our domestic budgets; the nation&#039;s is the same writ large</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have cut through the obfuscation with a scalpel.Cut the public sector by 20%.Your leader would have immense public backing if he had the courage to announce this as his economic policy.Most of us are practising this in our domestic budgets; the nation&#8217;s is the same writ large</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Fairney</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/05/11/public-spending-20-off/#comment-38009</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Fairney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 19:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3646#comment-38009</guid>
		<description>er, send into meltdown?  

Yes, thank god for the wise government....

(Hint: probably best if you imagine that in an ironic voice)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>er, send into meltdown?  </p>
<p>Yes, thank god for the wise government&#8230;.</p>
<p>(Hint: probably best if you imagine that in an ironic voice)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Fairney</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/05/11/public-spending-20-off/#comment-38008</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Fairney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 19:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3646#comment-38008</guid>
		<description>Mine too when I started a company recently, they rarely responded promptly, were able to offer only generic advice available free elsewhere, and made no practical contribution at all.  

But at least my taxes pay for non-jobs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mine too when I started a company recently, they rarely responded promptly, were able to offer only generic advice available free elsewhere, and made no practical contribution at all.  </p>
<p>But at least my taxes pay for non-jobs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Peirson</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/05/11/public-spending-20-off/#comment-38005</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Peirson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3646#comment-38005</guid>
		<description>What exactly do these people do apart from interfere in our lives.
If Govt didn&#039;t take taxes of Pensioners, they wouldn&#039;t need winter fuel allowances.
If Govt&#039; didn&#039;t take taxes of people, they wouldn&#039;t need family tax credit top ups.
Even if by some chance a pensioner or parent did need money, if the Govt wasn&#039;t fleecing their relatives, they would be able to help out.
Get rid of the Income tax system, that is the problem.
Ok let&#039;s say we take £100 off Fred from his salary, does this £100 pound go to the Pensioners, no it can&#039;t do, a few pounds goes to the pensioners, the rest goes on the Salaries of the civil servants doing the Redistribution.
It&#039;s all a scam, a way for the Cancer that is Govt, from keeping us enslaved to them.

People shouldn;t have to work 40 hrs per week, live should be about spending with your friends and family, and if Big govt didn&#039;t steal our wealth we wouldn&#039;t have to.

These civil servants should be out doing proper work with which we can trade with other nations.
No I don;t mean teachers, police, armedforces and nurses, I&#039;m talking about all the Non Jobs.
I went for some carreers advice, so I went to one office, they told me to go to another office, who then gave me a list of organisations to contact like the bank of england, etc asking them for a JOb.
so at least two offices were completely unnecesary.
Big Govt is simply a way of keeping us enslaved and downtrodden, and controlled with regulations whilst stealing our wealth to pay for the priveledge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What exactly do these people do apart from interfere in our lives.<br />
If Govt didn&#8217;t take taxes of Pensioners, they wouldn&#8217;t need winter fuel allowances.<br />
If Govt&#8217; didn&#8217;t take taxes of people, they wouldn&#8217;t need family tax credit top ups.<br />
Even if by some chance a pensioner or parent did need money, if the Govt wasn&#8217;t fleecing their relatives, they would be able to help out.<br />
Get rid of the Income tax system, that is the problem.<br />
Ok let&#8217;s say we take £100 off Fred from his salary, does this £100 pound go to the Pensioners, no it can&#8217;t do, a few pounds goes to the pensioners, the rest goes on the Salaries of the civil servants doing the Redistribution.<br />
It&#8217;s all a scam, a way for the Cancer that is Govt, from keeping us enslaved to them.</p>
<p>People shouldn;t have to work 40 hrs per week, live should be about spending with your friends and family, and if Big govt didn&#8217;t steal our wealth we wouldn&#8217;t have to.</p>
<p>These civil servants should be out doing proper work with which we can trade with other nations.<br />
No I don;t mean teachers, police, armedforces and nurses, I&#8217;m talking about all the Non Jobs.<br />
I went for some carreers advice, so I went to one office, they told me to go to another office, who then gave me a list of organisations to contact like the bank of england, etc asking them for a JOb.<br />
so at least two offices were completely unnecesary.<br />
Big Govt is simply a way of keeping us enslaved and downtrodden, and controlled with regulations whilst stealing our wealth to pay for the priveledge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan jutson</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/05/11/public-spending-20-off/#comment-38001</link>
		<dc:creator>alan jutson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 17:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=3646#comment-38001</guid>
		<description>He was an advisor on Banking to Gordon Brown !!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He was an advisor on Banking to Gordon Brown !!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
