<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;The lie of the land&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/11/the-lie-of-the-land/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/11/the-lie-of-the-land/</link>
	<description>Conservative Party Candidate for Wokingham</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:12:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bazman</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/11/the-lie-of-the-land/#comment-41934</link>
		<dc:creator>Bazman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 07:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4032#comment-41934</guid>
		<description>Now you are getting it. A &#039;Labour&#039; government coming to the end of its life having done little to make up the gap between rich and poor and unable to take on the financial system it saved. Carrots for the rich without any stick.Helping elite people wreck the system for their own gains and then helping them to do it again. In real terms socialism for the rich and capitalism for everyone else. 
You could not make it up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now you are getting it. A &#8216;Labour&#8217; government coming to the end of its life having done little to make up the gap between rich and poor and unable to take on the financial system it saved. Carrots for the rich without any stick.Helping elite people wreck the system for their own gains and then helping them to do it again. In real terms socialism for the rich and capitalism for everyone else.<br />
You could not make it up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lola</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/11/the-lie-of-the-land/#comment-41898</link>
		<dc:creator>Lola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4032#comment-41898</guid>
		<description>Nope I do not advocate crony capitalism, or more accurately oligarchism.  That&#039;s what YOU say I advocate.  Standard lefty debating trick.  Say what you wanted me to say and which I didn&#039;t say, and then set about destroying the argument I did not make.

If you bother read what I write you will note that I am entirely against cartelisation, or crony capitalism in your terms.  And what I have advoacted will more likely result in the increase in pay for hospital cleaners, not its reduction.

I agree entirely about governemnt jobs for government cronies.  It is disgraceful how Brown has both inflated the pay and the numbers of non-productive wealth destroying state non-jobs.  But there you go, that&#039;s totalitrian socialism for you.

Furthermore if you read what I have said I have advocated the breaking up of large international banks. I have stated and will do so again that in the UK the retail banks are an out of control cartel supplier of a monopoly product.  But the answer is not nationalisation, especilly not of failed banks.  The answer to banking failure is to let them go bust.  It would be less costly to do that and for the taxpayer to recompense depositors who lost money, than to pump money into the banks to keep them afloat.  Which of course also exponentially increases the moral hazard.  Witness the £11m package of the new RBS boss.  Of course the biggest and most fundamental banking failure was that of all central banks throughout the world.  They and their crony masters in national Treasuries and Government&#039;s have so destroyed national currencies by forever tinkering with interest rates and money supply in complete contradiction to market signals that they are the primary precipitators of the retail and wholesale banking mess.

And yes an excess of regulation did cause the crash.  The financial regulation and consumer protection policies increased the moral hazard and when combined with ludicrously lax fiscal, monetary and economic policies of various hopeless governments, including ours absolutely ensured that we would head straight to a fall.  Note, the FSA rulebook when printed out stands 8.5 feet high.  No-one reads it, least of all the FSA. It only knows it by section.  It is in reality nationalisation by regulation.  It is fundamental in promoting the crash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope I do not advocate crony capitalism, or more accurately oligarchism.  That&#8217;s what YOU say I advocate.  Standard lefty debating trick.  Say what you wanted me to say and which I didn&#8217;t say, and then set about destroying the argument I did not make.</p>
<p>If you bother read what I write you will note that I am entirely against cartelisation, or crony capitalism in your terms.  And what I have advoacted will more likely result in the increase in pay for hospital cleaners, not its reduction.</p>
<p>I agree entirely about governemnt jobs for government cronies.  It is disgraceful how Brown has both inflated the pay and the numbers of non-productive wealth destroying state non-jobs.  But there you go, that&#8217;s totalitrian socialism for you.</p>
<p>Furthermore if you read what I have said I have advocated the breaking up of large international banks. I have stated and will do so again that in the UK the retail banks are an out of control cartel supplier of a monopoly product.  But the answer is not nationalisation, especilly not of failed banks.  The answer to banking failure is to let them go bust.  It would be less costly to do that and for the taxpayer to recompense depositors who lost money, than to pump money into the banks to keep them afloat.  Which of course also exponentially increases the moral hazard.  Witness the £11m package of the new RBS boss.  Of course the biggest and most fundamental banking failure was that of all central banks throughout the world.  They and their crony masters in national Treasuries and Government&#8217;s have so destroyed national currencies by forever tinkering with interest rates and money supply in complete contradiction to market signals that they are the primary precipitators of the retail and wholesale banking mess.</p>
<p>And yes an excess of regulation did cause the crash.  The financial regulation and consumer protection policies increased the moral hazard and when combined with ludicrously lax fiscal, monetary and economic policies of various hopeless governments, including ours absolutely ensured that we would head straight to a fall.  Note, the FSA rulebook when printed out stands 8.5 feet high.  No-one reads it, least of all the FSA. It only knows it by section.  It is in reality nationalisation by regulation.  It is fundamental in promoting the crash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bazman</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/11/the-lie-of-the-land/#comment-41885</link>
		<dc:creator>Bazman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4032#comment-41885</guid>
		<description>Crony capitalism is what you advocate. Communism for the few. Are you so naive to think that companies do not exploit and do what they can get away with especially in the areas they have most control of. ie employees and customers. 
Bankers now want to be paid a fortune to continue their foolish practices. Was it to much regulation that caused the crash? 
To think that large multi nationals and banks have their customers, workforce, shareholders interests at heart is naive. Who&#039;s interests do they uphold. It&#039;s a good question. Who owns these companies? Shareholders? Nope. Who gains. Lets think, have a bonus for the right answer and bear in mind who will bear the brunt of all these cuts you advocate. Would they rally work? I don&#039;t thinks so. During the 1980&#039;s tax and unemployment went up not down.
Over the last ten years the middle income people have done very well and much of the wasted money went into their pockets via government contacts and government jobs for the chaps and gels, on top of a trebling of house prices. Cutting the income of a hospital cleaner and the like, is not the way forward or acceptable. 
Russia suffers from only two problems, so the proverb goes, the fools and the roads. You don&#039;t need to be an economist to see that. Maybe they just did not believe enough?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crony capitalism is what you advocate. Communism for the few. Are you so naive to think that companies do not exploit and do what they can get away with especially in the areas they have most control of. ie employees and customers.<br />
Bankers now want to be paid a fortune to continue their foolish practices. Was it to much regulation that caused the crash?<br />
To think that large multi nationals and banks have their customers, workforce, shareholders interests at heart is naive. Who&#8217;s interests do they uphold. It&#8217;s a good question. Who owns these companies? Shareholders? Nope. Who gains. Lets think, have a bonus for the right answer and bear in mind who will bear the brunt of all these cuts you advocate. Would they rally work? I don&#8217;t thinks so. During the 1980&#8217;s tax and unemployment went up not down.<br />
Over the last ten years the middle income people have done very well and much of the wasted money went into their pockets via government contacts and government jobs for the chaps and gels, on top of a trebling of house prices. Cutting the income of a hospital cleaner and the like, is not the way forward or acceptable.<br />
Russia suffers from only two problems, so the proverb goes, the fools and the roads. You don&#8217;t need to be an economist to see that. Maybe they just did not believe enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lola</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/11/the-lie-of-the-land/#comment-41877</link>
		<dc:creator>Lola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 08:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4032#comment-41877</guid>
		<description>Yep. Next?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep. Next?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Peirson</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/11/the-lie-of-the-land/#comment-41845</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Peirson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4032#comment-41845</guid>
		<description>Because as children they were weaklings and were presistently bullied, had their sweets and toys taken off them, now it&#039;s pay back time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because as children they were weaklings and were presistently bullied, had their sweets and toys taken off them, now it&#8217;s pay back time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Peirson</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/11/the-lie-of-the-land/#comment-41844</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Peirson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4032#comment-41844</guid>
		<description>Blimey, I didn&#039;t think you would allow that one Mr Redwood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blimey, I didn&#8217;t think you would allow that one Mr Redwood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no one</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/11/the-lie-of-the-land/#comment-41836</link>
		<dc:creator>no one</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 12:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4032#comment-41836</guid>
		<description>i went to a state school, 2000 kids, and the headmaster did teach lessons...

certainly i see no need for budgets for things like books to be filtered through a LEA which eats at least 40% before the school ever gets a books budget

like healthcare schools need to be changed radically so that the power is in the hands of the customers, real power so that if nobody uses a poor school or poor hospital department they dont get any money and have to shut

easier than youd think to do</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i went to a state school, 2000 kids, and the headmaster did teach lessons&#8230;</p>
<p>certainly i see no need for budgets for things like books to be filtered through a LEA which eats at least 40% before the school ever gets a books budget</p>
<p>like healthcare schools need to be changed radically so that the power is in the hands of the customers, real power so that if nobody uses a poor school or poor hospital department they dont get any money and have to shut</p>
<p>easier than youd think to do</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lola</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/11/the-lie-of-the-land/#comment-41819</link>
		<dc:creator>Lola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4032#comment-41819</guid>
		<description>I will go on.
To much regulation. = nationalisation lite = wealth destruction
Hedge funds are good. Yep. They keep managements honest.
Bonuses. are very good but because the banks are now a state cartel they bear no realtionship to performance.
Entitlement is the way forward. Nope.  Enitlement is exactly the problem.
More of the same. ?
Fools and roads. ?
Thatcher… A genuine leader.
cuts. Yes. Lots of them please.
poverty. Hate it.  Let&#039;s have more freedom and markets to get people out of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will go on.<br />
To much regulation. = nationalisation lite = wealth destruction<br />
Hedge funds are good. Yep. They keep managements honest.<br />
Bonuses. are very good but because the banks are now a state cartel they bear no realtionship to performance.<br />
Entitlement is the way forward. Nope.  Enitlement is exactly the problem.<br />
More of the same. ?<br />
Fools and roads. ?<br />
Thatcher… A genuine leader.<br />
cuts. Yes. Lots of them please.<br />
poverty. Hate it.  Let&#8217;s have more freedom and markets to get people out of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lola</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/11/the-lie-of-the-land/#comment-41818</link>
		<dc:creator>Lola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4032#comment-41818</guid>
		<description>Your own logic defeats you.  Cartalisation exists all over the place.  Along with its companion sin of mercantilism and protectionism.  The problem is not that freedom and markets have failed it is that they have never been properly freed from political opportunism and the favouritism given to special groups.

In a properly free and competitive market no business will survive 1 day if it operates on the  ‘What can we get away with and how long can we get away with it.’ principle you advocate.  My customers don&#039;t buy from me because they love me. They buy from me because I give them the product or service they want and like at a price they think is good value.  Similarly I don&#039;t love my customers because they are nice people, which they are, I love and care for them because they pay me, and I enjoy the satisfaction of providing an excellent product and service that means they come back and buy from me again.

In regards to health care it is the statist model that is the sick joke.  Essentially what we have is a bureaucratic rationing system that manages to be at the same time massively poor quality and very expensive.  I fully recognise that the NHS is alledged to do things cheaply, and it does.  It does this by exploiting its employees.  Exploiting employees and overcharging customers is exactly what monopolies do.

If one thinks about it there are many free market models on which health care could be supplied, many of which are not directly commercial.  What we are confusing is a desired outcome with provision.  It matters not to anyone just who does the healthcare, what matters is that you get the treatment that sorts you out.

In regards to the French (and German) car industry it is mainly actually or quasi nationalised.  It is not manufacturer collusion it is state protectionism and cartelisation.  Both Renault and PSA have been technically bust for years but kept in being by the state.  Freedom and markets would have seen them gone and the wealth they have destroyed wouldn&#039;t have been and other businesses that have suffered losses consequential on the subsidies would have been profitable and been able to expand.  What the French have done is export unemployment and reduce the wealth of their own citizens.

Japan is the same.  So is China.  These are not in any way economies based on freedom and markets.  Neither come to that is the USA.  The USA is massively protectionist and interventionist.  It has also run the same unsound money policies as Gordon Brown, which is why it is nearly as bust as we are.

There is no such thing as a natural monopoly.  Even the military can operate on the free market model, if you are happy to employ mercenaries (we call them Gurkhas) as many armies do.

Lastly it is the business of business to exploit opportunity, not resources.  A good case often quoted as to how businesses are destructively exploitative is the wanton logging of the Brazilian Rainforest.  I happen to think that this is a Bad Thing and needs discouraging, althought plenty freedom and markets philosophers wouldn&#039;t agree with me.   It is a failure of the rule of law that permits gangsters to carry on a trade of &#039;illegal&#039; logging, not business.  If the forest was properly policed and the rule of law enforced business would find alternative ways of making plywood to satisfy the demand.

Before you carry on arguing about markets and freedom I suggest you do some self education and be sure of your facts.  There are any number of sound textbooks you can start with, I suggest Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt and build on that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your own logic defeats you.  Cartalisation exists all over the place.  Along with its companion sin of mercantilism and protectionism.  The problem is not that freedom and markets have failed it is that they have never been properly freed from political opportunism and the favouritism given to special groups.</p>
<p>In a properly free and competitive market no business will survive 1 day if it operates on the  ‘What can we get away with and how long can we get away with it.’ principle you advocate.  My customers don&#8217;t buy from me because they love me. They buy from me because I give them the product or service they want and like at a price they think is good value.  Similarly I don&#8217;t love my customers because they are nice people, which they are, I love and care for them because they pay me, and I enjoy the satisfaction of providing an excellent product and service that means they come back and buy from me again.</p>
<p>In regards to health care it is the statist model that is the sick joke.  Essentially what we have is a bureaucratic rationing system that manages to be at the same time massively poor quality and very expensive.  I fully recognise that the NHS is alledged to do things cheaply, and it does.  It does this by exploiting its employees.  Exploiting employees and overcharging customers is exactly what monopolies do.</p>
<p>If one thinks about it there are many free market models on which health care could be supplied, many of which are not directly commercial.  What we are confusing is a desired outcome with provision.  It matters not to anyone just who does the healthcare, what matters is that you get the treatment that sorts you out.</p>
<p>In regards to the French (and German) car industry it is mainly actually or quasi nationalised.  It is not manufacturer collusion it is state protectionism and cartelisation.  Both Renault and PSA have been technically bust for years but kept in being by the state.  Freedom and markets would have seen them gone and the wealth they have destroyed wouldn&#8217;t have been and other businesses that have suffered losses consequential on the subsidies would have been profitable and been able to expand.  What the French have done is export unemployment and reduce the wealth of their own citizens.</p>
<p>Japan is the same.  So is China.  These are not in any way economies based on freedom and markets.  Neither come to that is the USA.  The USA is massively protectionist and interventionist.  It has also run the same unsound money policies as Gordon Brown, which is why it is nearly as bust as we are.</p>
<p>There is no such thing as a natural monopoly.  Even the military can operate on the free market model, if you are happy to employ mercenaries (we call them Gurkhas) as many armies do.</p>
<p>Lastly it is the business of business to exploit opportunity, not resources.  A good case often quoted as to how businesses are destructively exploitative is the wanton logging of the Brazilian Rainforest.  I happen to think that this is a Bad Thing and needs discouraging, althought plenty freedom and markets philosophers wouldn&#8217;t agree with me.   It is a failure of the rule of law that permits gangsters to carry on a trade of &#8216;illegal&#8217; logging, not business.  If the forest was properly policed and the rule of law enforced business would find alternative ways of making plywood to satisfy the demand.</p>
<p>Before you carry on arguing about markets and freedom I suggest you do some self education and be sure of your facts.  There are any number of sound textbooks you can start with, I suggest Economics in One Lesson by Henry Hazlitt and build on that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Duffin</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/11/the-lie-of-the-land/#comment-41817</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Duffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4032#comment-41817</guid>
		<description>“If we can save money on what we buy to run a school by better purchasing , or can adminster it more cheaply to a good standard, we should do so.”

&quot;We&quot; should not be running schools at all, if &quot;we&quot; means the central state leviathan. Head teachers should be running schools, preferably accountable to the parents and nobody else.

&quot;We&quot; should not be administering the schools at all. Let the schools administer themselves.

Get rid of all the parasites and pen-pushers in the LEA&#039;s. 

I went to a school that had a head teacher who actually taught lessons, a sort of Business Manager chappie who was basically the accountant, three ladies in the office, and that was it. Seven hundred children, excellent results, NO bureaucrats. Why can&#039;t the State do it that way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“If we can save money on what we buy to run a school by better purchasing , or can adminster it more cheaply to a good standard, we should do so.”</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8221; should not be running schools at all, if &#8220;we&#8221; means the central state leviathan. Head teachers should be running schools, preferably accountable to the parents and nobody else.</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8221; should not be administering the schools at all. Let the schools administer themselves.</p>
<p>Get rid of all the parasites and pen-pushers in the LEA&#8217;s. </p>
<p>I went to a school that had a head teacher who actually taught lessons, a sort of Business Manager chappie who was basically the accountant, three ladies in the office, and that was it. Seven hundred children, excellent results, NO bureaucrats. Why can&#8217;t the State do it that way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Belchamber</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/11/the-lie-of-the-land/#comment-41811</link>
		<dc:creator>David Belchamber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4032#comment-41811</guid>
		<description>It might not be quite a lie but Brown regularly accuses the conservatives of proposing cuts now while the country is in recession. He therefore implies that he is not cutting back on public services but:

* Sir Hugh Orde said recently that forces were feeling the strain from having to make efficiency savings of about seven per cent during the current and next financial year.
* the prison service has had its budget cut.
* the probation service has had its budget cut.
* some rural post offices have been cut back.
* some rurial surgeries are under threat.

There are probably other examples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It might not be quite a lie but Brown regularly accuses the conservatives of proposing cuts now while the country is in recession. He therefore implies that he is not cutting back on public services but:</p>
<p>* Sir Hugh Orde said recently that forces were feeling the strain from having to make efficiency savings of about seven per cent during the current and next financial year.<br />
* the prison service has had its budget cut.<br />
* the probation service has had its budget cut.<br />
* some rural post offices have been cut back.<br />
* some rurial surgeries are under threat.</p>
<p>There are probably other examples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bazman</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/11/the-lie-of-the-land/#comment-41804</link>
		<dc:creator>Bazman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 08:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4032#comment-41804</guid>
		<description>The idea of private healthcare is a sick joke when most businesses are run on the basis of &#039;What can we get away with and how long can we get away with it.&#039; Business. The exploitation of people and resources. Would you not agree?
The banking system really just produced rent and forced the rest to pay rent. It did little if anything to improve operations. 
What about when there is a natural monopoly? If you go and create a market you are in effect going against the free market by creating absurdly complicated contracts to which the governments gets kippered every time.
The free market of the car industry is much of a lie to. Secret subsidies to manufactures. Collusion between manufactures. In France most of the cars are French same in Germany and Japan.
This simplistic free market dogma is out of date a lie and for the birds. You are trying to put the town market which has always worked and been free, to complicated world markets. Thatchers main trick. 
Be aware of anyone offering simple answers to complex questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idea of private healthcare is a sick joke when most businesses are run on the basis of &#8216;What can we get away with and how long can we get away with it.&#8217; Business. The exploitation of people and resources. Would you not agree?<br />
The banking system really just produced rent and forced the rest to pay rent. It did little if anything to improve operations.<br />
What about when there is a natural monopoly? If you go and create a market you are in effect going against the free market by creating absurdly complicated contracts to which the governments gets kippered every time.<br />
The free market of the car industry is much of a lie to. Secret subsidies to manufactures. Collusion between manufactures. In France most of the cars are French same in Germany and Japan.<br />
This simplistic free market dogma is out of date a lie and for the birds. You are trying to put the town market which has always worked and been free, to complicated world markets. Thatchers main trick.<br />
Be aware of anyone offering simple answers to complex questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Peirson</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/11/the-lie-of-the-land/#comment-41789</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Peirson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4032#comment-41789</guid>
		<description>The Greatest lie, and the one at the heart of all our problems is that Westminster and Whitehall work in the Best interests of Britain or the British people.
With a few notable exceptions of course.

public borrowing is necessary to pay for Public services like the military, nurses, police etc, it&#039;s not, we could coin our own money free and issue that into the economy.

that muslims carried out 9-11 and 7-7, madrid and Paris, Not accoring to Ex italian PM Francesco Cossiga.

http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/cossiga_ex_italian_pres_intel_agencies_know_911_inside_job.htm

So many Lies, so little time.

Global warming is caused by man, actually I haven&#039;t looked into this one too much, but if 20 thousand scientists can put together a petition arguing against man made global warming then I&#039;m prepared to doubt what Westminster says, especially since they seem to be still proposing mass mass immigration which will exascerbate the problem, not to mention landfill and congestion problems, housing shortages.
Trees not taxes thats what I want for my children.

Oh yes, another Lie

Swine flu is naturally occuring

Michael Shrimpton
http://www.intelligencesummit.org/speakers/MichaelShrimpton.php

A Weaponised flu variant
http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/2009/07/swine-flu-can-no-longer-be-contained.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Greatest lie, and the one at the heart of all our problems is that Westminster and Whitehall work in the Best interests of Britain or the British people.<br />
With a few notable exceptions of course.</p>
<p>public borrowing is necessary to pay for Public services like the military, nurses, police etc, it&#8217;s not, we could coin our own money free and issue that into the economy.</p>
<p>that muslims carried out 9-11 and 7-7, madrid and Paris, Not accoring to Ex italian PM Francesco Cossiga.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/cossiga_ex_italian_pres_intel_agencies_know_911_inside_job.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.infowars.com/articles/sept11/cossiga_ex_italian_pres_intel_agencies_know_911_inside_job.htm</a></p>
<p>So many Lies, so little time.</p>
<p>Global warming is caused by man, actually I haven&#8217;t looked into this one too much, but if 20 thousand scientists can put together a petition arguing against man made global warming then I&#8217;m prepared to doubt what Westminster says, especially since they seem to be still proposing mass mass immigration which will exascerbate the problem, not to mention landfill and congestion problems, housing shortages.<br />
Trees not taxes thats what I want for my children.</p>
<p>Oh yes, another Lie</p>
<p>Swine flu is naturally occuring</p>
<p>Michael Shrimpton<br />
<a href="http://www.intelligencesummit.org/speakers/MichaelShrimpton.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.intelligencesummit.org/speakers/MichaelShrimpton.php</a></p>
<p>A Weaponised flu variant<br />
<a href="http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/2009/07/swine-flu-can-no-longer-be-contained.html" rel="nofollow">http://archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.com/2009/07/swine-flu-can-no-longer-be-contained.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Peirson</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/11/the-lie-of-the-land/#comment-41788</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Peirson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 22:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4032#comment-41788</guid>
		<description>Veg Oil, grown by our own farmers, remember we still have some Nth sea oil so its not like we would need to produce all our requirement this way.
also I&#039;m sure we could Grow Trees, blant 100 billion trees, that&#039;s what I&#039;d like to see in my childrens Country.
If each tree weighs ten tonnes, then that&#039;s 1 Trillion tons of Carbon fixed from the Atmosphere, although I understand Global Mcstalin has come up with an even better idea, Carbon Capture technology, all paid for through taxation of course.
Let me Guess, some false Boffin in a White coat stands next to a fridge bought from Comet, at the back of which is placed some Soot from someone chimney, and they claim look at this carbon we have captured from this latest british invention, think of your children, You do want clean air for your childrem kittens, baby chicks, seal pups etc etc.
Now hand over the Taxes or we will get the Bailiffs in, resist and the Privatised fully armed ACPO police paramilitaries will shoot you.

Converted Fridge and a few shovels of soot from someones chimney are not going to fool me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Veg Oil, grown by our own farmers, remember we still have some Nth sea oil so its not like we would need to produce all our requirement this way.<br />
also I&#8217;m sure we could Grow Trees, blant 100 billion trees, that&#8217;s what I&#8217;d like to see in my childrens Country.<br />
If each tree weighs ten tonnes, then that&#8217;s 1 Trillion tons of Carbon fixed from the Atmosphere, although I understand Global Mcstalin has come up with an even better idea, Carbon Capture technology, all paid for through taxation of course.<br />
Let me Guess, some false Boffin in a White coat stands next to a fridge bought from Comet, at the back of which is placed some Soot from someone chimney, and they claim look at this carbon we have captured from this latest british invention, think of your children, You do want clean air for your childrem kittens, baby chicks, seal pups etc etc.<br />
Now hand over the Taxes or we will get the Bailiffs in, resist and the Privatised fully armed ACPO police paramilitaries will shoot you.</p>
<p>Converted Fridge and a few shovels of soot from someones chimney are not going to fool me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bazman</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/11/the-lie-of-the-land/#comment-41780</link>
		<dc:creator>Bazman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4032#comment-41780</guid>
		<description>I will go on.
To much regulation.
Hedge funds are good.
Bonuses.
Entitlement is the way forward.
More of the same.
Fools and roads.
Thatcher...
cuts.
poverty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will go on.<br />
To much regulation.<br />
Hedge funds are good.<br />
Bonuses.<br />
Entitlement is the way forward.<br />
More of the same.<br />
Fools and roads.<br />
Thatcher&#8230;<br />
cuts.<br />
poverty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldrightie</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/11/the-lie-of-the-land/#comment-41779</link>
		<dc:creator>oldrightie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4032#comment-41779</guid>
		<description>Thank you, John. I was using 2005 as a benchmark for when Labour&#039;s and Browns deceit began to be obvious to most intelligent people. Their losses at that election and Michael Howard&#039;s success were all buried by Howard&#039;s immediate stepping down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, John. I was using 2005 as a benchmark for when Labour&#8217;s and Browns deceit began to be obvious to most intelligent people. Their losses at that election and Michael Howard&#8217;s success were all buried by Howard&#8217;s immediate stepping down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bazman</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/11/the-lie-of-the-land/#comment-41778</link>
		<dc:creator>Bazman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4032#comment-41778</guid>
		<description>Hedge fund contribute to the economy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hedge fund contribute to the economy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Belchamber</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/11/the-lie-of-the-land/#comment-41767</link>
		<dc:creator>David Belchamber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 15:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4032#comment-41767</guid>
		<description>&quot;I invest, you spend and he wastes&quot;

&quot;I make efficiency savings, you reduce spending, he makes cuts&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I invest, you spend and he wastes&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I make efficiency savings, you reduce spending, he makes cuts&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lola</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/11/the-lie-of-the-land/#comment-41762</link>
		<dc:creator>Lola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 14:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4032#comment-41762</guid>
		<description>Nope.  Freedom and markets have done for totalitarian leftyism.  The Bif Lie is that the current problems are the fault of fre markets.  No they aren&#039;t.  This is freedom and markets passing an accurate judgement of the fiscal, monetary and economic policy failures of US, UK, and European governements.  Freedom and markets are also revealing how the protectionist and mercantilist policies of for example China are equally bound and certain to impoverish the Chinese.

At the same time the two remaining UK statist monopolies, health and education, continue to exploit their employees, delivera bad service and overcharge heir customers.

Of all the Big Lies used by New Labour totalitarians the &#039;market failure&#039; mantra is probably the biggest.  It is straight out of 1984. Lies are Truth.  This continuous deceit is what will foevere eventually condemn them to oblivion.  If you tell lies the truth will eventually catch up with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope.  Freedom and markets have done for totalitarian leftyism.  The Bif Lie is that the current problems are the fault of fre markets.  No they aren&#8217;t.  This is freedom and markets passing an accurate judgement of the fiscal, monetary and economic policy failures of US, UK, and European governements.  Freedom and markets are also revealing how the protectionist and mercantilist policies of for example China are equally bound and certain to impoverish the Chinese.</p>
<p>At the same time the two remaining UK statist monopolies, health and education, continue to exploit their employees, delivera bad service and overcharge heir customers.</p>
<p>Of all the Big Lies used by New Labour totalitarians the &#8216;market failure&#8217; mantra is probably the biggest.  It is straight out of 1984. Lies are Truth.  This continuous deceit is what will foevere eventually condemn them to oblivion.  If you tell lies the truth will eventually catch up with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TimC</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/07/11/the-lie-of-the-land/#comment-41756</link>
		<dc:creator>TimC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4032#comment-41756</guid>
		<description>The big lie? 
There is a single cake and it can and must be divided fairly.
You only have to look at the effect of falling wages for the employed- by the definition of child poverty relating it to a percentage of average income this means that as the &#039;rich&#039; get poorer the effect is to reduce child poverty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big lie?<br />
There is a single cake and it can and must be divided fairly.<br />
You only have to look at the effect of falling wages for the employed- by the definition of child poverty relating it to a percentage of average income this means that as the &#8216;rich&#8217; get poorer the effect is to reduce child poverty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
