<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: French pique</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/05/french-pique/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/05/french-pique/</link>
	<description>Conservative Party Candidate for Wokingham</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:39:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: TimC</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/05/french-pique/#comment-48709</link>
		<dc:creator>TimC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4889#comment-48709</guid>
		<description>The EU want a new budget settlement in 2010. They don&#039;t get it unless they agree to the Cameron clawbacks. Is this too hard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The EU want a new budget settlement in 2010. They don&#8217;t get it unless they agree to the Cameron clawbacks. Is this too hard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wrake</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/05/french-pique/#comment-48695</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wrake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4889#comment-48695</guid>
		<description>Let intelligent people refrain from being distracted by talk of French politicians words, claw-back of competence, referenda on this or that, trade disparities, the outcome of the next General Election and the effect of voting for UKIP - and return to basic facts.

The European Union is a political construct and Europe is a geographical location.

Our membership of the European Union was engineered by treasonous politicians, confirmed by a referendum based on a lie (that it did not affect our national sovereignty) and maintained by successive governments of both colours. Like many others, I was duped into supporting what I was told was a scheme to improve trade and co-operation between European nations.

The written components of the English Constitution, the 39 Articles of Religion (necessarily subscribed to by every beneficed minister of the Church of England), the oath of loyalty to the Monarch sworn by every person holding any public office in Parliament, Courts and the Armed Forces, the Queen&#039;s Coronation Oath to govern Her people in accordance with their laws and customs - all make abundantly clear that the European Communities Act, as amended by subsequent amending treaties, is unlawful.

Sovereignty does not rest in Parliament. It rests with the people, who give it to the monarch in response to the Coronation Oath and loan it for a term of years to the Crown in Parliament. Parliament has no authority to pass sovereignty to any third party and is specifically forbidden to pass it to a foreign power.

English citizens must not obey treasonous laws or they incur the penalty for misprision of treason (i.e. aiding and abetting treason.) In any case, law based on an illegality does not have the nature of law.

Any purported law or treaty, contrary to the Common Law of England and the English Constitution has no force, unless people voluntarily partake of it&#039;s unlawful nature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let intelligent people refrain from being distracted by talk of French politicians words, claw-back of competence, referenda on this or that, trade disparities, the outcome of the next General Election and the effect of voting for UKIP &#8211; and return to basic facts.</p>
<p>The European Union is a political construct and Europe is a geographical location.</p>
<p>Our membership of the European Union was engineered by treasonous politicians, confirmed by a referendum based on a lie (that it did not affect our national sovereignty) and maintained by successive governments of both colours. Like many others, I was duped into supporting what I was told was a scheme to improve trade and co-operation between European nations.</p>
<p>The written components of the English Constitution, the 39 Articles of Religion (necessarily subscribed to by every beneficed minister of the Church of England), the oath of loyalty to the Monarch sworn by every person holding any public office in Parliament, Courts and the Armed Forces, the Queen&#8217;s Coronation Oath to govern Her people in accordance with their laws and customs &#8211; all make abundantly clear that the European Communities Act, as amended by subsequent amending treaties, is unlawful.</p>
<p>Sovereignty does not rest in Parliament. It rests with the people, who give it to the monarch in response to the Coronation Oath and loan it for a term of years to the Crown in Parliament. Parliament has no authority to pass sovereignty to any third party and is specifically forbidden to pass it to a foreign power.</p>
<p>English citizens must not obey treasonous laws or they incur the penalty for misprision of treason (i.e. aiding and abetting treason.) In any case, law based on an illegality does not have the nature of law.</p>
<p>Any purported law or treaty, contrary to the Common Law of England and the English Constitution has no force, unless people voluntarily partake of it&#8217;s unlawful nature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sir Graphus</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/05/french-pique/#comment-48692</link>
		<dc:creator>Sir Graphus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4889#comment-48692</guid>
		<description>Someone wrote that Cameron&#039;s new EU policy is like installing a new burglar alarm after the robbery. 

This was meant as a criticism, but actually, it&#039;s the best that can be done. Having a referendum now would be effectively having a vote about whether we&#039;d prefer not to have been burgled. 

Well, Cameron hasn&#039;t been in charge of security for these last dozen years, and in fact the present security guards brazenly ushered the burglars in through the open window.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone wrote that Cameron&#8217;s new EU policy is like installing a new burglar alarm after the robbery. </p>
<p>This was meant as a criticism, but actually, it&#8217;s the best that can be done. Having a referendum now would be effectively having a vote about whether we&#8217;d prefer not to have been burgled. </p>
<p>Well, Cameron hasn&#8217;t been in charge of security for these last dozen years, and in fact the present security guards brazenly ushered the burglars in through the open window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Les</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/05/french-pique/#comment-48675</link>
		<dc:creator>Les</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4889#comment-48675</guid>
		<description>I think if the EU don&#039;t play ball then Cameron will go for a referendum - which the EU definitely don&#039;t want. Remember Thatcher&#039;s  demands were met with laughter, but they gave in eventually.
People underestimate our clout - the thing we have which the other countries do not - is that risk of a referendum, and I think Cameron could well use it.
We are not some small country like the czechs, latvia or whoever.
Everyone seems brainwashed into thinking we are all doomed.
Think again, but Cameron&#039;s first priority has to be the economy/afghanistan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if the EU don&#8217;t play ball then Cameron will go for a referendum &#8211; which the EU definitely don&#8217;t want. Remember Thatcher&#8217;s  demands were met with laughter, but they gave in eventually.<br />
People underestimate our clout &#8211; the thing we have which the other countries do not &#8211; is that risk of a referendum, and I think Cameron could well use it.<br />
We are not some small country like the czechs, latvia or whoever.<br />
Everyone seems brainwashed into thinking we are all doomed.<br />
Think again, but Cameron&#8217;s first priority has to be the economy/afghanistan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/05/french-pique/#comment-48654</link>
		<dc:creator>James Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4889#comment-48654</guid>
		<description>Does anyone, either in Britain or Europe, believe that Messrs Hague and Cameron are willing to play hard ball with the EU to the degree that would be necessary to achieve any repatriation of  powers? If they were, the first thing they would do is go for a referendum, ratification or no ratification, as it would send a clear statement of intent, both to the British public and the EU.

Voting Conservative in the expectation that there will be any reversal of the EU ratchet would be a triumph of hope over experience of impressive magnitude - a bit like Eddie the Eagle re-entering the winter olympics in the expectation of a medal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone, either in Britain or Europe, believe that Messrs Hague and Cameron are willing to play hard ball with the EU to the degree that would be necessary to achieve any repatriation of  powers? If they were, the first thing they would do is go for a referendum, ratification or no ratification, as it would send a clear statement of intent, both to the British public and the EU.</p>
<p>Voting Conservative in the expectation that there will be any reversal of the EU ratchet would be a triumph of hope over experience of impressive magnitude &#8211; a bit like Eddie the Eagle re-entering the winter olympics in the expectation of a medal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SJB</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/05/french-pique/#comment-48650</link>
		<dc:creator>SJB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4889#comment-48650</guid>
		<description>Tony E: &quot;The French farmers need their subsidy, and they can’t have it unless we, (and the other nett contributors) pay for it.&quot;

For the 2008 EU budget, France made a net contribution of around €4 four billion; the UK net contribution was less than €1 (one) billion.
http://euobserver.com/886/28706</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony E: &#8220;The French farmers need their subsidy, and they can’t have it unless we, (and the other nett contributors) pay for it.&#8221;</p>
<p>For the 2008 EU budget, France made a net contribution of around €4 four billion; the UK net contribution was less than €1 (one) billion.<br />
<a href="http://euobserver.com/886/28706" rel="nofollow">http://euobserver.com/886/28706</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Tomkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/05/french-pique/#comment-48644</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Tomkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4889#comment-48644</guid>
		<description>Reading this blog clearly suggests that you also want to go much further than Hague and Cameron. People want to know when a political party is going to listen to what kind of relationship they want with the EU. Successive governments have given away power to the anti-democratic EU without seeking the approval of the people. Our servants have become our masters and treated us with contempt. No one will believe that the next Conservative government will try very hard to &quot;wrestle some power back from the EU&quot;. In fact yesterday Hague seemed to go out of his way to placate the other member states - he seems to have given up before he has even started. I suggest that you tell your colleagues who, regarding MPs&#039; expenses, feel that they have been treated like s***, to join the club, that is exactly how millions of us feel regarding membership of the EU.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading this blog clearly suggests that you also want to go much further than Hague and Cameron. People want to know when a political party is going to listen to what kind of relationship they want with the EU. Successive governments have given away power to the anti-democratic EU without seeking the approval of the people. Our servants have become our masters and treated us with contempt. No one will believe that the next Conservative government will try very hard to &#8220;wrestle some power back from the EU&#8221;. In fact yesterday Hague seemed to go out of his way to placate the other member states &#8211; he seems to have given up before he has even started. I suggest that you tell your colleagues who, regarding MPs&#8217; expenses, feel that they have been treated like s***, to join the club, that is exactly how millions of us feel regarding membership of the EU.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek W. Buxton</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/05/french-pique/#comment-48637</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek W. Buxton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 18:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4889#comment-48637</guid>
		<description>In all the bad news one has to laugh at such gems as &quot;We should have the EU we want&quot;,  oh dear.  There is no choice, never has been and never will be.  What you see is what you get, non democratic rule by a bunch of clerks mainly brought up on the French attitude of &quot;we are always right and you will do as we say&quot;.  

As for the Cameron attitude it defies belief, he must know that there can be no re-negotiation, the system is designed to be as it is, a single state governed by an elite, forget democracy and freedom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In all the bad news one has to laugh at such gems as &#8220;We should have the EU we want&#8221;,  oh dear.  There is no choice, never has been and never will be.  What you see is what you get, non democratic rule by a bunch of clerks mainly brought up on the French attitude of &#8220;we are always right and you will do as we say&#8221;.  </p>
<p>As for the Cameron attitude it defies belief, he must know that there can be no re-negotiation, the system is designed to be as it is, a single state governed by an elite, forget democracy and freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/05/french-pique/#comment-48636</link>
		<dc:creator>brian kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4889#comment-48636</guid>
		<description>We, as a country, must stand by the law -  but the EU must be taken on and confronted at every opportunity. They have far more to lose than we do - as John Redwood says, we get a rotten deal for our money and we must be resolute in reversing that situation. In terms of trade we are heavily in deficit and we must use that fact to our political advantage.  We have the only real armed service in the whole of the EU which also gives us a strong negotiating position [but we must not ever allow the EU gain control over it].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We, as a country, must stand by the law &#8211;  but the EU must be taken on and confronted at every opportunity. They have far more to lose than we do &#8211; as John Redwood says, we get a rotten deal for our money and we must be resolute in reversing that situation. In terms of trade we are heavily in deficit and we must use that fact to our political advantage.  We have the only real armed service in the whole of the EU which also gives us a strong negotiating position [but we must not ever allow the EU gain control over it].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iain</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/05/french-pique/#comment-48635</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 17:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4889#comment-48635</guid>
		<description>What a decadent lot we have in Parliament, the troughing, their feeble acceptance of Sharia law here,  their desertion of Parliament, last week after listening to the roll call of the 37 troops that have died while they were on their extended break, half of them couldn&#039;t be bothered to stay and hear Gordon Brown&#039;s statement on Afghanistan (no doubt their luncheon appointment was more important), and how casually they disenfranchise us with the EU.  It all stems from the fact that the British political establishment have become truly corrupt and decadent. Principle, integrity, honesty are alien concepts in Westminster. 

This is the Rotten Parliament. 

May be one day we will get a Government that will up hold our constitution, the 1689 Bill of Rights states... 

 &#039;I do declare That noe Forreigne Prince Person Prelate, State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authoritie Ecclesiastical or Spirituall within this Realme Soe helpe me God”. &#039;....

 …So we don&#039;t need Dave&#039;s pathetic Sovereignty Law, its there in our constitution already, but  Parliament in allowing Brussels law be supreme to ours, and with the Lisbon Treaty giving the EU a legal personality they have contravened OUR Bill of Rights, and that makes this Rotten Parliament, not just decadent, but traitorous as well, and tonight we should be dragging these traitorous MP&#039;s onto the top of our bonfires to burn alongside Guido Fawkes (with a few exceptions John).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a decadent lot we have in Parliament, the troughing, their feeble acceptance of Sharia law here,  their desertion of Parliament, last week after listening to the roll call of the 37 troops that have died while they were on their extended break, half of them couldn&#8217;t be bothered to stay and hear Gordon Brown&#8217;s statement on Afghanistan (no doubt their luncheon appointment was more important), and how casually they disenfranchise us with the EU.  It all stems from the fact that the British political establishment have become truly corrupt and decadent. Principle, integrity, honesty are alien concepts in Westminster. </p>
<p>This is the Rotten Parliament. </p>
<p>May be one day we will get a Government that will up hold our constitution, the 1689 Bill of Rights states&#8230; </p>
<p> &#8216;I do declare That noe Forreigne Prince Person Prelate, State or Potentate hath or ought to have any Jurisdiction Power Superiority Preeminence or Authoritie Ecclesiastical or Spirituall within this Realme Soe helpe me God”. &#8216;&#8230;.</p>
<p> …So we don&#8217;t need Dave&#8217;s pathetic Sovereignty Law, its there in our constitution already, but  Parliament in allowing Brussels law be supreme to ours, and with the Lisbon Treaty giving the EU a legal personality they have contravened OUR Bill of Rights, and that makes this Rotten Parliament, not just decadent, but traitorous as well, and tonight we should be dragging these traitorous MP&#8217;s onto the top of our bonfires to burn alongside Guido Fawkes (with a few exceptions John).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no one</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/05/french-pique/#comment-48628</link>
		<dc:creator>no one</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4889#comment-48628</guid>
		<description>Reply: How do you know he took the bar bill for expenses? What was the purpose of the trip and the bar visit?

because he said he would

i was there visiting a friend and we met him randomly at the start of the session and got chatting as you do in bars

nice guy, was actually reasonably impressed by him

only doing what countless other business people do with their expenses

but not what i would be doing if i were an MEP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reply: How do you know he took the bar bill for expenses? What was the purpose of the trip and the bar visit?</p>
<p>because he said he would</p>
<p>i was there visiting a friend and we met him randomly at the start of the session and got chatting as you do in bars</p>
<p>nice guy, was actually reasonably impressed by him</p>
<p>only doing what countless other business people do with their expenses</p>
<p>but not what i would be doing if i were an MEP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay McDougall</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/05/french-pique/#comment-48627</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay McDougall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4889#comment-48627</guid>
		<description>As people can see from my response to &#039;Lisbon Lies&#039;, I would not mind a bust up with Europe at all. Given their cynical and anti-democratic behaviour, the Eurocrats and the French and German governments deserve nothing better.

However, messrs Cameron and Hague have said it isn&#039;t going to happen, and they appear to have thought through their plan B carefully.

I would counsel against people running off to UKIP at the next election. UKIP haven&#039;t enough candidates with &#039;bottom&#039;, are perceived as being a one issue party and have no experience of government. Their role at the next election will be as spoilers, sincere though they may be.

The time, if any, to jump ship to UKIP is about a year into the next Conservative government (assuming there is one) if the actions taken by the Conservative government are inadequate.
Let&#039;s keep our powder dry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As people can see from my response to &#8216;Lisbon Lies&#8217;, I would not mind a bust up with Europe at all. Given their cynical and anti-democratic behaviour, the Eurocrats and the French and German governments deserve nothing better.</p>
<p>However, messrs Cameron and Hague have said it isn&#8217;t going to happen, and they appear to have thought through their plan B carefully.</p>
<p>I would counsel against people running off to UKIP at the next election. UKIP haven&#8217;t enough candidates with &#8216;bottom&#8217;, are perceived as being a one issue party and have no experience of government. Their role at the next election will be as spoilers, sincere though they may be.</p>
<p>The time, if any, to jump ship to UKIP is about a year into the next Conservative government (assuming there is one) if the actions taken by the Conservative government are inadequate.<br />
Let&#8217;s keep our powder dry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael mcgrath</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/05/french-pique/#comment-48624</link>
		<dc:creator>michael mcgrath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4889#comment-48624</guid>
		<description>Colin D says &quot;No-one has ever wrested anything from the EU&quot;...what nonsense. Margaret Thatcher went in to bat on the question of the UK rebate and WON. This considerable achievement has, of course been handed back by (regular guy) Tony while McCavity Brown avoids all conflicts

If the Conservatives win the forthcoming General Election, they will need a considerable majority to straighten out the mess left by the labourites.  Only when this has been achieved will we be in a strong position to return to the table and negotiate. The government will then also have the option to call a referendum on the level of our future involvement in the EU if such a threat is needed. By that time also, we will have had opportunities to observe the reality behind this &quot;Tidying-up Exercise&quot; and will have reflected upon the true effect of the Treaty rather than the hyperbole uttered on both sides as at present

A referendum in face of the current state of the nation would be a pointless diversion from the real challenge before us...since UKIP are a single policy group, they will not have taken this on board

As to the &quot;Cast Iron Guarantee&quot;,  I feel some sympathy for the then somewhat naive, though certainly sincere DC having left such a hostage to fortune.

Harold Wilson once said &quot;a week is a long time in politics&quot;...DC made his statement 2 YEARS ago</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colin D says &#8220;No-one has ever wrested anything from the EU&#8221;&#8230;what nonsense. Margaret Thatcher went in to bat on the question of the UK rebate and WON. This considerable achievement has, of course been handed back by (regular guy) Tony while McCavity Brown avoids all conflicts</p>
<p>If the Conservatives win the forthcoming General Election, they will need a considerable majority to straighten out the mess left by the labourites.  Only when this has been achieved will we be in a strong position to return to the table and negotiate. The government will then also have the option to call a referendum on the level of our future involvement in the EU if such a threat is needed. By that time also, we will have had opportunities to observe the reality behind this &#8220;Tidying-up Exercise&#8221; and will have reflected upon the true effect of the Treaty rather than the hyperbole uttered on both sides as at present</p>
<p>A referendum in face of the current state of the nation would be a pointless diversion from the real challenge before us&#8230;since UKIP are a single policy group, they will not have taken this on board</p>
<p>As to the &#8220;Cast Iron Guarantee&#8221;,  I feel some sympathy for the then somewhat naive, though certainly sincere DC having left such a hostage to fortune.</p>
<p>Harold Wilson once said &#8220;a week is a long time in politics&#8221;&#8230;DC made his statement 2 YEARS ago</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HK</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/05/french-pique/#comment-48622</link>
		<dc:creator>HK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 14:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4889#comment-48622</guid>
		<description>Steve Cox: &quot;In other words, the referendum would be on whether we wish, as a nation, to stay in the EU or to leave it. Mr. Cameron has apparently stated, however, that he will not support such a referendum. May I ask why?&quot; 

Without wishing to put words in Cameron&#039;s mouth, might I suggest that he doesn&#039;t believe that the people are really ready for an in/out referendum.  Not ready in the sense that they clearly do not like Lisbon, but there is no corresponding groundswell of opinion about leaving the EU.

A lot of anger, but also a huge &quot;don&#039;t know&quot; group who don&#039;t consider it the top priority.  That huge &quot;don&#039;t know&quot; group would probably coalesce around the status quo: pre-Lisbon, that would mean voting no to Lisbon; on an in/out vote, it could well be &quot;in&quot;.

If there was an in/out referendum and the result was &quot;in&quot; then that would be the matter settled for decades to come, including everything that EU-sceptics (myself included) most dislike.

However I don&#039;t think it is unrealistic to think that public opinion will firm up, one way or another, over the next few years as a result of the negotiations Cameron is proposing to conduct.  The direction and success of those negotiations will determine which way that public opinion will move.

Many will say that Cameron will never accept an in/out vote.  I have no idea if he will, but I would far prefer that vote be driven by overwhelming popular demand to leave the EU, rather than simply by frustration at the dishonesty of Labour/Lib Dems over the Lisbon Treaty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Cox: &#8220;In other words, the referendum would be on whether we wish, as a nation, to stay in the EU or to leave it. Mr. Cameron has apparently stated, however, that he will not support such a referendum. May I ask why?&#8221; </p>
<p>Without wishing to put words in Cameron&#8217;s mouth, might I suggest that he doesn&#8217;t believe that the people are really ready for an in/out referendum.  Not ready in the sense that they clearly do not like Lisbon, but there is no corresponding groundswell of opinion about leaving the EU.</p>
<p>A lot of anger, but also a huge &#8220;don&#8217;t know&#8221; group who don&#8217;t consider it the top priority.  That huge &#8220;don&#8217;t know&#8221; group would probably coalesce around the status quo: pre-Lisbon, that would mean voting no to Lisbon; on an in/out vote, it could well be &#8220;in&#8221;.</p>
<p>If there was an in/out referendum and the result was &#8220;in&#8221; then that would be the matter settled for decades to come, including everything that EU-sceptics (myself included) most dislike.</p>
<p>However I don&#8217;t think it is unrealistic to think that public opinion will firm up, one way or another, over the next few years as a result of the negotiations Cameron is proposing to conduct.  The direction and success of those negotiations will determine which way that public opinion will move.</p>
<p>Many will say that Cameron will never accept an in/out vote.  I have no idea if he will, but I would far prefer that vote be driven by overwhelming popular demand to leave the EU, rather than simply by frustration at the dishonesty of Labour/Lib Dems over the Lisbon Treaty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David B</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/05/french-pique/#comment-48616</link>
		<dc:creator>David B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:46:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4889#comment-48616</guid>
		<description>At the time the Lisbon Treaty passed through the House of Commons, the Lib Dems voted against a referendum on the treaty (and abstained in the Lords), thus ensuring the passage of the bill into law.  In the debate they made a statement that we should not have a referendum on Lisbon, but a referendum on weather we are in or out of the EU.  This appeared to be a dangerous strategy which had been though up just to ensure they could justify the rejection of referendum on the Lisbon treat, which they wanted passed into law but understood full well that the majority of the British people did not.

I wondered then how long it would take them to brush this idea under the carpet.  I think we now know.  Not once has Nick Clegg mentioned this proposed referendum since.

Now the Lisbon treaty has been ratified I think it is time for Lib Dems to show if they were honest about the referendum.  They should now be on all media outlets calling for an in/out referendum.  I suspect, though, they have prove again that referendum pledges are only to get out of tight positions and are not meant to be taken seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the time the Lisbon Treaty passed through the House of Commons, the Lib Dems voted against a referendum on the treaty (and abstained in the Lords), thus ensuring the passage of the bill into law.  In the debate they made a statement that we should not have a referendum on Lisbon, but a referendum on weather we are in or out of the EU.  This appeared to be a dangerous strategy which had been though up just to ensure they could justify the rejection of referendum on the Lisbon treat, which they wanted passed into law but understood full well that the majority of the British people did not.</p>
<p>I wondered then how long it would take them to brush this idea under the carpet.  I think we now know.  Not once has Nick Clegg mentioned this proposed referendum since.</p>
<p>Now the Lisbon treaty has been ratified I think it is time for Lib Dems to show if they were honest about the referendum.  They should now be on all media outlets calling for an in/out referendum.  I suspect, though, they have prove again that referendum pledges are only to get out of tight positions and are not meant to be taken seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Eve</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/05/french-pique/#comment-48615</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Eve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4889#comment-48615</guid>
		<description>I believe we need to get all powers back.

I&#039;m not sure if I will vote UKIP - I&#039;m very interested to hear what Hannan &amp; Carswell say over the months leading up to the election.

I think the Plan is the way to go and I know the leadership have taken bits of it.

I&#039;m not happy with a situation where the other 26 states just shut up shop and we have to wait five years to show them we are very serious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe we need to get all powers back.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure if I will vote UKIP &#8211; I&#8217;m very interested to hear what Hannan &amp; Carswell say over the months leading up to the election.</p>
<p>I think the Plan is the way to go and I know the leadership have taken bits of it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not happy with a situation where the other 26 states just shut up shop and we have to wait five years to show them we are very serious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/05/french-pique/#comment-48612</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4889#comment-48612</guid>
		<description>Does David Camerson have the strength of will to threaten to withold our over-generous payments to the EU as a bargaining stick to force renegotiation of Britain&#039;s position in the EU - should he be elected? This is less likely now that he has publically reneged on a promised Lisbon referendum even if some of us understand why he has done so. We lost seats at the last election because of UKIP and we will do so again.  It is frustrating but a vote for UKIP makes another Labour Government more likely and a continuation of the EU federal project a certainty - is that what those thinking of jumping ship really want?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does David Camerson have the strength of will to threaten to withold our over-generous payments to the EU as a bargaining stick to force renegotiation of Britain&#8217;s position in the EU &#8211; should he be elected? This is less likely now that he has publically reneged on a promised Lisbon referendum even if some of us understand why he has done so. We lost seats at the last election because of UKIP and we will do so again.  It is frustrating but a vote for UKIP makes another Labour Government more likely and a continuation of the EU federal project a certainty &#8211; is that what those thinking of jumping ship really want?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/05/french-pique/#comment-48611</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4889#comment-48611</guid>
		<description>If you look at a relatively recent book &#039;Youth in Europe 1&#039; (Lit Verlag, 2005), you will see survey data that shows what young people of around 16-18 in nine countries think of Europe and its politicians.  Interestingly you will see that the typical pro-European is a well educated young women with slightly green opinions who supports human rights and sees Europe as a place where there are plentiful employment opportunities.  She may be a linguist and she enjoys travel.  The anti-European by contrast is a male who finds foreigners a threat and who distrusts government and bureaucracy.  He has a sense of social break-down and distrusts the political classes.

Between these poles are plenty of young people who find politics boring and who turn away from the public sphere to look for meaning in youth culture and relationships.

For myself, I think that has been rightly said that the EU project is an alliance between numerous minorities (e.g. Walloons, Scots, Basques, Luxemburgers, Belgians) and centralising smoothies in Brussels and Strasbourg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you look at a relatively recent book &#8216;Youth in Europe 1&#8242; (Lit Verlag, 2005), you will see survey data that shows what young people of around 16-18 in nine countries think of Europe and its politicians.  Interestingly you will see that the typical pro-European is a well educated young women with slightly green opinions who supports human rights and sees Europe as a place where there are plentiful employment opportunities.  She may be a linguist and she enjoys travel.  The anti-European by contrast is a male who finds foreigners a threat and who distrusts government and bureaucracy.  He has a sense of social break-down and distrusts the political classes.</p>
<p>Between these poles are plenty of young people who find politics boring and who turn away from the public sphere to look for meaning in youth culture and relationships.</p>
<p>For myself, I think that has been rightly said that the EU project is an alliance between numerous minorities (e.g. Walloons, Scots, Basques, Luxemburgers, Belgians) and centralising smoothies in Brussels and Strasbourg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no one</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/05/french-pique/#comment-48607</link>
		<dc:creator>no one</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4889#comment-48607</guid>
		<description>Having been entertained all day in a bar in Brussels, with friends, by a Conservative MEP who openly took the days bar tab receipt to put on his MEP expenses I think rather more roundly on these issues than many. There are clearly some Conservatives who are happy to run up big unnecessary bills for the European tax payer which ultimately gets picked up by hard working families in the UK and elsewhere.

Reply: How do you know he took the bar bill for expenses? What was the purpose of the trip and the bar visit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having been entertained all day in a bar in Brussels, with friends, by a Conservative MEP who openly took the days bar tab receipt to put on his MEP expenses I think rather more roundly on these issues than many. There are clearly some Conservatives who are happy to run up big unnecessary bills for the European tax payer which ultimately gets picked up by hard working families in the UK and elsewhere.</p>
<p>Reply: How do you know he took the bar bill for expenses? What was the purpose of the trip and the bar visit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian E.</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/05/french-pique/#comment-48606</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian E.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 11:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4889#comment-48606</guid>
		<description>Treaties normally have a cause under which any party can withdraw, given appropriate notice. Why did any government sign a treaty without such a clause?

My worry is that once Cameron or Hague define how they might withdraw from some of the EU provisions or hold a referendum on any aspect, the Tories will have the whole weight of the European propaganda machine thrown against them and supporting Labour in the general election. We saw this in Ireland over their referendum where the &quot;antis&quot; stood no chance under the barrage of EU propaganda. No doubt the same will happen here, and at our expense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Treaties normally have a cause under which any party can withdraw, given appropriate notice. Why did any government sign a treaty without such a clause?</p>
<p>My worry is that once Cameron or Hague define how they might withdraw from some of the EU provisions or hold a referendum on any aspect, the Tories will have the whole weight of the European propaganda machine thrown against them and supporting Labour in the general election. We saw this in Ireland over their referendum where the &#8220;antis&#8221; stood no chance under the barrage of EU propaganda. No doubt the same will happen here, and at our expense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
