<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What should Eurosceptics do now?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/22/what-should-eurosceptics-do-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/22/what-should-eurosceptics-do-now/</link>
	<description>Conservative Party Candidate for Wokingham</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 10:45:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fernando</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/22/what-should-eurosceptics-do-now/#comment-49862</link>
		<dc:creator>Fernando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 09:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4995#comment-49862</guid>
		<description>Stuart, I was busy yesterday and could not reply to your comment. I applaud your patriotism but you will not be surprised to hear that I disagree with you. I am old enough to have voted to leave the EU in the 1975 referendum. I felt at that time that we could build on EFTA and some of the Commonwealth countries to create our own trading bloc. In some ways I still think that this was a lost opportunity as such a bloc with strong transatlantic links would have been more attractive than the EU to many east European countries after the fall of Communism.
However, we stayed a member and the EU has moved on apace since then, notably with the single market championed by Margaret Thatcher. A colossus, with 30% of world trade, has been created which will impact us profoundly whether we are in or out. The company I have helped to grow over nearly forty years now has marketing outlets in most EU countries and toll manufacturing arrangements with companies throughout the union. Our economic future is bound up with the EU.
I think the threat to leave is hollow. There is no point in a threat unless you are willing to carry it out. I lived through the 1975 referendum and I don’t believe that you can convince a fearful electorate to leave; persuade them that the undoubted short-term disruption will be worth it in the long term. Personally, I would prefer the current, imperfect relationship rather than our being outside the EU.
Part of the reason I don’t think you can convince the electorate goes to the heart of why I think the BOO case is weak. It rests on the assumption that we can jettison all the aspects of the EU which we dislike and yet still have untrammelled access to their markets. This is a leap of faith that I find totally unconvincing. Of course they will want to trade with us but on what terms. The negotiations will not be between equal parties. Well over half of our trade is with them and only 5-10% of their trade is with us. Bluntly, we need them more than they need us. Putting aside the likelihood that they will probably not want to encourage secession by granting us favourable terms, the experience of other countries negotiating trading arrangements wit the EU is not encouraging. Norway still has to contribute to EU coffers. Also, the non EU members of the EEA (Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway) have had to agree to enact legislation similar to that passed in the EU in the areas of social policy, consumer protection, environment, company law and statistics. So they have to accept the red tape but have no influence over formulating policy. Even our opt-out from the euro could be under threat. To prevent competitive devaluations they are likely to insist the pound is aligned to the euro within certain limits.
I’m less pessimistic than you about the prospects of creating a decentralised, more flexible EU. Tides turn. EU enlargement will mean some of the arrangements need revision. The accession of the new members in the east creates potential allies. On one point I am certain: the EU will have a big impact on us in the future and we are better off being able to influence decisions rather than being ( I use your phrase) recumbently impotent outside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stuart, I was busy yesterday and could not reply to your comment. I applaud your patriotism but you will not be surprised to hear that I disagree with you. I am old enough to have voted to leave the EU in the 1975 referendum. I felt at that time that we could build on EFTA and some of the Commonwealth countries to create our own trading bloc. In some ways I still think that this was a lost opportunity as such a bloc with strong transatlantic links would have been more attractive than the EU to many east European countries after the fall of Communism.<br />
However, we stayed a member and the EU has moved on apace since then, notably with the single market championed by Margaret Thatcher. A colossus, with 30% of world trade, has been created which will impact us profoundly whether we are in or out. The company I have helped to grow over nearly forty years now has marketing outlets in most EU countries and toll manufacturing arrangements with companies throughout the union. Our economic future is bound up with the EU.<br />
I think the threat to leave is hollow. There is no point in a threat unless you are willing to carry it out. I lived through the 1975 referendum and I don’t believe that you can convince a fearful electorate to leave; persuade them that the undoubted short-term disruption will be worth it in the long term. Personally, I would prefer the current, imperfect relationship rather than our being outside the EU.<br />
Part of the reason I don’t think you can convince the electorate goes to the heart of why I think the BOO case is weak. It rests on the assumption that we can jettison all the aspects of the EU which we dislike and yet still have untrammelled access to their markets. This is a leap of faith that I find totally unconvincing. Of course they will want to trade with us but on what terms. The negotiations will not be between equal parties. Well over half of our trade is with them and only 5-10% of their trade is with us. Bluntly, we need them more than they need us. Putting aside the likelihood that they will probably not want to encourage secession by granting us favourable terms, the experience of other countries negotiating trading arrangements wit the EU is not encouraging. Norway still has to contribute to EU coffers. Also, the non EU members of the EEA (Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway) have had to agree to enact legislation similar to that passed in the EU in the areas of social policy, consumer protection, environment, company law and statistics. So they have to accept the red tape but have no influence over formulating policy. Even our opt-out from the euro could be under threat. To prevent competitive devaluations they are likely to insist the pound is aligned to the euro within certain limits.<br />
I’m less pessimistic than you about the prospects of creating a decentralised, more flexible EU. Tides turn. EU enlargement will mean some of the arrangements need revision. The accession of the new members in the east creates potential allies. On one point I am certain: the EU will have a big impact on us in the future and we are better off being able to influence decisions rather than being ( I use your phrase) recumbently impotent outside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/22/what-should-eurosceptics-do-now/#comment-49836</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4995#comment-49836</guid>
		<description>Mike, if you really want to get the UK out of the EU voting UKIP is the surest way to achieve the exact opposite. In my own constituency it was the votes for UKIP which cost the sitting Conservative MP his seat in 1997. 

Every vote for UKIP is basically a vote for Labour. If you want Eurosceptics then vote Tory. The intake of new MPs next year will be profoundly Eurosceptic. The more the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike, if you really want to get the UK out of the EU voting UKIP is the surest way to achieve the exact opposite. In my own constituency it was the votes for UKIP which cost the sitting Conservative MP his seat in 1997. </p>
<p>Every vote for UKIP is basically a vote for Labour. If you want Eurosceptics then vote Tory. The intake of new MPs next year will be profoundly Eurosceptic. The more the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/22/what-should-eurosceptics-do-now/#comment-49835</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4995#comment-49835</guid>
		<description>I agree with Steve. I do not hear many pro-European views. What I hear are Euroseptic views, and indeed many many who do not wish to be part of the wretched EU. 

The EU is firmly anti-democratic and has been built by the political elite no matter what the people want or think. The political elite think it is cementing peace within Europe where they are actually sowing the seeds of war.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Steve. I do not hear many pro-European views. What I hear are Euroseptic views, and indeed many many who do not wish to be part of the wretched EU. </p>
<p>The EU is firmly anti-democratic and has been built by the political elite no matter what the people want or think. The political elite think it is cementing peace within Europe where they are actually sowing the seeds of war.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/22/what-should-eurosceptics-do-now/#comment-49832</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4995#comment-49832</guid>
		<description>I would like to be reassured by your words, but I have been told that there is no realistic hope of the Conservatives being able to negotiate return of powers to the UK as the system has &quot;ensured&quot; that this cannot happen.  If that were true, then the only option is complete withdrawal. I still think that Cameron does not fully comprehend how angry people are re the perceived U turn on the Lisbon Treaty and that he is going to lose so many votes in significant seats.  Many people just took his statement at apparent face value and after all the years of spin by this government they are not at all interested in the subtle interpretation of what was actually said - put simply they have had enough and are not prepared to be conciliatory or reasonable.  They feel deceived and feel that the Cons. are no better than Labour.  I trawl through a lot of websites and comments and this feeling is very widespread, alongside huge concerns re immigration.  One hears that those at Cons. HQ are concerned and genuinely puzzled why the voters don&#039;t take more to Cameron - to me it is obvious.  It is not the fact that they don&#039;t &quot;take to&quot; Cameron - the real point is that they don&#039;t take to his particular policies on issues which are key to voters i.e. the apparent betrayal on Lisbon and the lack of decisiveness on cutting immigration dramatically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to be reassured by your words, but I have been told that there is no realistic hope of the Conservatives being able to negotiate return of powers to the UK as the system has &#8220;ensured&#8221; that this cannot happen.  If that were true, then the only option is complete withdrawal. I still think that Cameron does not fully comprehend how angry people are re the perceived U turn on the Lisbon Treaty and that he is going to lose so many votes in significant seats.  Many people just took his statement at apparent face value and after all the years of spin by this government they are not at all interested in the subtle interpretation of what was actually said &#8211; put simply they have had enough and are not prepared to be conciliatory or reasonable.  They feel deceived and feel that the Cons. are no better than Labour.  I trawl through a lot of websites and comments and this feeling is very widespread, alongside huge concerns re immigration.  One hears that those at Cons. HQ are concerned and genuinely puzzled why the voters don&#8217;t take more to Cameron &#8211; to me it is obvious.  It is not the fact that they don&#8217;t &#8220;take to&#8221; Cameron &#8211; the real point is that they don&#8217;t take to his particular policies on issues which are key to voters i.e. the apparent betrayal on Lisbon and the lack of decisiveness on cutting immigration dramatically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrevorsDen</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/22/what-should-eurosceptics-do-now/#comment-49828</link>
		<dc:creator>TrevorsDen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4995#comment-49828</guid>
		<description>The Conservative party is my Party as well.  

You really are incredibly arrogant and stupid.  Go ahead (take advantage of my rudeness) vote UKIP, but do not come crying to me if we still have a labour govt.  Of course its me and people like me you rely on to stop that happening, whilst you go on and feed and vent your prejudice.

Suppose we had a 2 party system as in the USA?  Both Labour and Tories would be different, even bigger, coalitions.  How would you cope with that?
Democracy is not about everybody else doing what you want (unless your name is Gordon Brown of course).  What don&#039;t you want to happen?  If its the re-election of Brown Labour and more EU sycophancy then, wel ... you choice is clear.

I am not a member of the Tory party, but that is open to us all if we want more direct influence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Conservative party is my Party as well.  </p>
<p>You really are incredibly arrogant and stupid.  Go ahead (take advantage of my rudeness) vote UKIP, but do not come crying to me if we still have a labour govt.  Of course its me and people like me you rely on to stop that happening, whilst you go on and feed and vent your prejudice.</p>
<p>Suppose we had a 2 party system as in the USA?  Both Labour and Tories would be different, even bigger, coalitions.  How would you cope with that?<br />
Democracy is not about everybody else doing what you want (unless your name is Gordon Brown of course).  What don&#8217;t you want to happen?  If its the re-election of Brown Labour and more EU sycophancy then, wel &#8230; you choice is clear.</p>
<p>I am not a member of the Tory party, but that is open to us all if we want more direct influence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrevorsDen</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/22/what-should-eurosceptics-do-now/#comment-49826</link>
		<dc:creator>TrevorsDen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4995#comment-49826</guid>
		<description>Dear James
My big fish is getting a Tory govt elected.  

I would be happy to see us out of or have a more distant relationship with the EU.  No problems.  
But the notion that we can ignore the EU and can blissfully run our affairs in sweet isolation is baloney - as is the notion that we cannot govern ourselves if we want to.  
We can do what we want - we are not in the Euro - and the EU will struggle to stop us. 
Right now our bureaucrats are simply using the EU to aggrandise power and their prejudices.  Cameron wants a more distant relationship, he/the Tories want to repatriate powers.  Lets judge him on that.

But we face a bigger danger from our own bureaucrats and solving that would get my priority.

But James - you give the game away saying you are an English nationalist.  If Scotland want independence then thats their problem (they will never vote that way of course which is why Salmond constantly niggles the English) - England will survive, but I am British and want to continue to be British.  The Scots are nice people - I go there quite a bit, its sad that labour have ruined the country.  But for me &#039;Britain is Great&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear James<br />
My big fish is getting a Tory govt elected.  </p>
<p>I would be happy to see us out of or have a more distant relationship with the EU.  No problems.<br />
But the notion that we can ignore the EU and can blissfully run our affairs in sweet isolation is baloney &#8211; as is the notion that we cannot govern ourselves if we want to.<br />
We can do what we want &#8211; we are not in the Euro &#8211; and the EU will struggle to stop us.<br />
Right now our bureaucrats are simply using the EU to aggrandise power and their prejudices.  Cameron wants a more distant relationship, he/the Tories want to repatriate powers.  Lets judge him on that.</p>
<p>But we face a bigger danger from our own bureaucrats and solving that would get my priority.</p>
<p>But James &#8211; you give the game away saying you are an English nationalist.  If Scotland want independence then thats their problem (they will never vote that way of course which is why Salmond constantly niggles the English) &#8211; England will survive, but I am British and want to continue to be British.  The Scots are nice people &#8211; I go there quite a bit, its sad that labour have ruined the country.  But for me &#8216;Britain is Great&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Fairney</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/22/what-should-eurosceptics-do-now/#comment-49798</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Fairney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4995#comment-49798</guid>
		<description>With respect your argument seems curiously self-destructive.  You suggest we could achieve nothing be negotiation from a standpoint of fundamental re-alignment, (counsel of despair if I ever heard it incidentally) and yet we should stay in and seek reform by means of, (I guess) negotiation without the threat of withdrawl or sanction if the EU does not agree.

If negotiating from strength won&#039;t in your view succeed, how can negotiating from recumbent impotence be any more successful?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With respect your argument seems curiously self-destructive.  You suggest we could achieve nothing be negotiation from a standpoint of fundamental re-alignment, (counsel of despair if I ever heard it incidentally) and yet we should stay in and seek reform by means of, (I guess) negotiation without the threat of withdrawl or sanction if the EU does not agree.</p>
<p>If negotiating from strength won&#8217;t in your view succeed, how can negotiating from recumbent impotence be any more successful?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Matthews</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/22/what-should-eurosceptics-do-now/#comment-49790</link>
		<dc:creator>James Matthews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4995#comment-49790</guid>
		<description>Bigger fish than our freedom to govern ourselves? I beg to differ.

There aren&#039;t that many votes for the Tories in Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland either, but that does not make the Conservatives English Nationalist (more&#039;s the pity in my view) despite the claims of their opponents. UKIP with limited, but not zero, support outside England, remains determindly a UK party, just like the Conservatives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bigger fish than our freedom to govern ourselves? I beg to differ.</p>
<p>There aren&#8217;t that many votes for the Tories in Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland either, but that does not make the Conservatives English Nationalist (more&#8217;s the pity in my view) despite the claims of their opponents. UKIP with limited, but not zero, support outside England, remains determindly a UK party, just like the Conservatives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james barr</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/22/what-should-eurosceptics-do-now/#comment-49772</link>
		<dc:creator>james barr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 21:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4995#comment-49772</guid>
		<description>The UK should withdraw from the EU forhwith.

To hell with all the doomsayers who say the country would sink without the EU. What utter rubbish.

Withdrawing from the EU would give the country the shake-up it so badly needs. It is only self interested politicians and businessmen who tell us we would drown without the EU.

It&#039;s time for the UK to free itself from the shackles of this corrupt and expensive club. Let&#039;s stand on our own two feet. The appointment of two non-entities last week tells us all we need to know about this useless institution. It&#039;s too big, too costly and too interfering. 

Time to say ciao, adios, adieu.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UK should withdraw from the EU forhwith.</p>
<p>To hell with all the doomsayers who say the country would sink without the EU. What utter rubbish.</p>
<p>Withdrawing from the EU would give the country the shake-up it so badly needs. It is only self interested politicians and businessmen who tell us we would drown without the EU.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s time for the UK to free itself from the shackles of this corrupt and expensive club. Let&#8217;s stand on our own two feet. The appointment of two non-entities last week tells us all we need to know about this useless institution. It&#8217;s too big, too costly and too interfering. </p>
<p>Time to say ciao, adios, adieu&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/22/what-should-eurosceptics-do-now/#comment-49756</link>
		<dc:creator>brian kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4995#comment-49756</guid>
		<description>Completely correct, John Redwood.  And what I am becoming more certain of is that eurosceptics must stay within the party and vote - and then, post election, pressurize the party and your MP from within. When thought about it is the only rational way that change as regards our relationship with the EU will be hastened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Completely correct, John Redwood.  And what I am becoming more certain of is that eurosceptics must stay within the party and vote &#8211; and then, post election, pressurize the party and your MP from within. When thought about it is the only rational way that change as regards our relationship with the EU will be hastened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/22/what-should-eurosceptics-do-now/#comment-49754</link>
		<dc:creator>brian kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4995#comment-49754</guid>
		<description>We must, in all cases, act lawfully, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We must, in all cases, act lawfully, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/22/what-should-eurosceptics-do-now/#comment-49753</link>
		<dc:creator>brian kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4995#comment-49753</guid>
		<description>Thank you John Redwood for a clear and honest exposition of your beliefs and stance with respect to the EU and your view of David Cameron&#039;s and William Hague&#039;s views. I have considerable respect for your consistently straightforward and intelligent analyses as represented on this site. It is clear from the many comments everywhere on the blogosphere that many conservative voters are unhappy with David Cameron’s ‘no referendum’ statement, as also with his rather anodyne intentions to restore some powers back to us. I do understand his difficulty – the treaty is a fact – but I think that, to reclaim those wavering votes, he needs to provide stronger, but realistic, intentions. [As a matter of interest I would like to know just what the legal position is of withdrawing from the EU – not that I THINK this is, necessarily, the best option, but it is the one I instinctively prefer]. Our current relationship with the EU is damaging to this country and it is a matter of some urgency, in my view, that this relationship should be changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you John Redwood for a clear and honest exposition of your beliefs and stance with respect to the EU and your view of David Cameron&#8217;s and William Hague&#8217;s views. I have considerable respect for your consistently straightforward and intelligent analyses as represented on this site. It is clear from the many comments everywhere on the blogosphere that many conservative voters are unhappy with David Cameron’s ‘no referendum’ statement, as also with his rather anodyne intentions to restore some powers back to us. I do understand his difficulty – the treaty is a fact – but I think that, to reclaim those wavering votes, he needs to provide stronger, but realistic, intentions. [As a matter of interest I would like to know just what the legal position is of withdrawing from the EU – not that I THINK this is, necessarily, the best option, but it is the one I instinctively prefer]. Our current relationship with the EU is damaging to this country and it is a matter of some urgency, in my view, that this relationship should be changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TrevorsDen</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/22/what-should-eurosceptics-do-now/#comment-49748</link>
		<dc:creator>TrevorsDen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4995#comment-49748</guid>
		<description>Dear James

I would like to be out of the EU but there are believe it or not other fish to fry meantime and getting bogged down with the EU is not going to hepl anybody - and the majority of the voters will be easily persuaded by that line by labour if we give them a chance.
Our relationship with the EU will take its natural course - assuming that the sceptics use their brains.

One very big fish to fry of course is getting elected in the first place - then we will have the luxury of worrying how to deal with the EU at our leisure.

There are precisely no votes for UKIP in NI, Wales or Scotland.
UKIP have one USP - they can ensure the re-election of Gordon Brown.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear James</p>
<p>I would like to be out of the EU but there are believe it or not other fish to fry meantime and getting bogged down with the EU is not going to hepl anybody &#8211; and the majority of the voters will be easily persuaded by that line by labour if we give them a chance.<br />
Our relationship with the EU will take its natural course &#8211; assuming that the sceptics use their brains.</p>
<p>One very big fish to fry of course is getting elected in the first place &#8211; then we will have the luxury of worrying how to deal with the EU at our leisure.</p>
<p>There are precisely no votes for UKIP in NI, Wales or Scotland.<br />
UKIP have one USP &#8211; they can ensure the re-election of Gordon Brown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: APL</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/22/what-should-eurosceptics-do-now/#comment-49737</link>
		<dc:creator>APL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 13:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4995#comment-49737</guid>
		<description>JR: &quot;If we had not done so the UK could now be facing a choice between three pro Euro currency parties.&quot;

Wonderful, so instead of three pro Euro currency parties, we now have the choice of three pro EU parties.

Plus ça change, plus c&#039;est la même chose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JR: &#8220;If we had not done so the UK could now be facing a choice between three pro Euro currency parties.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wonderful, so instead of three pro Euro currency parties, we now have the choice of three pro EU parties.</p>
<p>Plus ça change, plus c&#8217;est la même chose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Stevens</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/22/what-should-eurosceptics-do-now/#comment-49725</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Stevens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4995#comment-49725</guid>
		<description>The official Conservative position is to accept what has gone before and sort of try and forestall further changes.

This is a non-party-political version of the &quot;Leftward ratchet&quot; in other sorts of policies. No effort is made to unratchet such changes.

What has gone before is patently the fault of Labour but a general election draws a line under that. I am therefore less interested in attribution of blame for the situation but very interested in what positive action the Tories intend to reverse the position, not merely to cope with status quo.

Awaited with interest but not a great deal of hope.

If Conservative policy on EU is essentially the same as the other main parties then, in the words of the jokey alternative SAS motto:
&quot;Who Cares Who Wins&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The official Conservative position is to accept what has gone before and sort of try and forestall further changes.</p>
<p>This is a non-party-political version of the &#8220;Leftward ratchet&#8221; in other sorts of policies. No effort is made to unratchet such changes.</p>
<p>What has gone before is patently the fault of Labour but a general election draws a line under that. I am therefore less interested in attribution of blame for the situation but very interested in what positive action the Tories intend to reverse the position, not merely to cope with status quo.</p>
<p>Awaited with interest but not a great deal of hope.</p>
<p>If Conservative policy on EU is essentially the same as the other main parties then, in the words of the jokey alternative SAS motto:<br />
&#8220;Who Cares Who Wins&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter van Leeuwen</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/22/what-should-eurosceptics-do-now/#comment-49706</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter van Leeuwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4995#comment-49706</guid>
		<description>I see a flaw in your argumentation: 
&quot;long march to democratic self government&quot; has NOT reached its destination. Your most severe &quot;democratic deficit&quot; is that smaller parties have no chance in the UK. 
That is why a party like UKIP only has a chance in the European Parliament, where it is clearly barking up the wrong tree (these decisions are for Westminster, not for the EU). 
You defend the &quot;status quo&quot; (of de-facto 2 parties) and as such prevent better democracy to take hold in Britain, you prevent yourself from being threatened by parties like UKIP or BNP. 

If you are serious about democratic self-government you should put &quot;electoral reform&quot; at the top of your list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see a flaw in your argumentation:<br />
&#8220;long march to democratic self government&#8221; has NOT reached its destination. Your most severe &#8220;democratic deficit&#8221; is that smaller parties have no chance in the UK.<br />
That is why a party like UKIP only has a chance in the European Parliament, where it is clearly barking up the wrong tree (these decisions are for Westminster, not for the EU).<br />
You defend the &#8220;status quo&#8221; (of de-facto 2 parties) and as such prevent better democracy to take hold in Britain, you prevent yourself from being threatened by parties like UKIP or BNP. </p>
<p>If you are serious about democratic self-government you should put &#8220;electoral reform&#8221; at the top of your list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pipesmoker</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/22/what-should-eurosceptics-do-now/#comment-49699</link>
		<dc:creator>pipesmoker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4995#comment-49699</guid>
		<description>In 1997 my local Conservative MP gave me an honest handwritten assurance, in reply to a letter, of his position on membership of the European Union.   That was good enough for me and had he not lost his seat I would still be voting for him.  I would not have to ask JR and were he my MP I would turn out and support him.

It took me around three years to extract a response from Janet Dean (Labour), the current MP,  she is of course very pro EU.

I am still angry about the way Heath took us into the Common Market and others since have used every device to get us further into the EC and EU and ratification of the Constitution/Lisbon Treaty..   

Parliament will soon be little more than a Shire County Council in a Country called Europe and I am resolutely against it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 1997 my local Conservative MP gave me an honest handwritten assurance, in reply to a letter, of his position on membership of the European Union.   That was good enough for me and had he not lost his seat I would still be voting for him.  I would not have to ask JR and were he my MP I would turn out and support him.</p>
<p>It took me around three years to extract a response from Janet Dean (Labour), the current MP,  she is of course very pro EU.</p>
<p>I am still angry about the way Heath took us into the Common Market and others since have used every device to get us further into the EC and EU and ratification of the Constitution/Lisbon Treaty..   </p>
<p>Parliament will soon be little more than a Shire County Council in a Country called Europe and I am resolutely against it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lola</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/22/what-should-eurosceptics-do-now/#comment-49691</link>
		<dc:creator>Lola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4995#comment-49691</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s interesting that you are a BNP member campaiging against the Labour incumbent.  It rather reinforces my view that the BNP manifesto is closer to Labour&#039;s than the Tories. (It&#039;s also very close to the Green&#039;s).  Hence the BNP should be better categorised as a &#039;far left&#039; party than as a &#039;far right&#039; one.

As a point of information I am disenfranchised in Ipswich. I run and am taxed on a business based in Ipswich, but I have no vote on who represent Ipswich since I live in a Suffolk constituency outside the Town.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s interesting that you are a BNP member campaiging against the Labour incumbent.  It rather reinforces my view that the BNP manifesto is closer to Labour&#8217;s than the Tories. (It&#8217;s also very close to the Green&#8217;s).  Hence the BNP should be better categorised as a &#8216;far left&#8217; party than as a &#8216;far right&#8217; one.</p>
<p>As a point of information I am disenfranchised in Ipswich. I run and am taxed on a business based in Ipswich, but I have no vote on who represent Ipswich since I live in a Suffolk constituency outside the Town.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr Bernard Juby</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/22/what-should-eurosceptics-do-now/#comment-49690</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr Bernard Juby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4995#comment-49690</guid>
		<description>How is it then that e.g. France and Germany can decide which parts of the Aquis communitaire they are going to abide by and the rest can&#039;t?

Surely we could &quot;do a Germany&quot; by giving our courts over-riding powers over the place-men in the ECHR?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is it then that e.g. France and Germany can decide which parts of the Aquis communitaire they are going to abide by and the rest can&#8217;t?</p>
<p>Surely we could &#8220;do a Germany&#8221; by giving our courts over-riding powers over the place-men in the ECHR?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lola</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/22/what-should-eurosceptics-do-now/#comment-49689</link>
		<dc:creator>Lola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 09:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=4995#comment-49689</guid>
		<description>Ho! Ho! &#039;Fog in channel, Continent cut off&#039;? Perhaps, well, no, definitely.  

You can argue about the causes for Hitler&#039;s failure to follow up on Dunkirk; German General Staff unable to think maritime, Hitler&#039;s strategic failure and thoughts on negotiation plus the planned Barbarrosa operation for which he needed troops, Goerings offer that he could bomb us into surrender with flawed tactics, and so on.  But fundamentally the UK democratic system survived fierce internal debate and terrifying external threats and provided a generally unanimous effort to defeat tyranny.  Churchill, despite his near dictatorship powers still supported democracy and went to the House twice a week (unlike that clown Blair who only went once a week) for PM&#039;s QT.  He also appointed and listened to good advisers, especially his military advisers.

Now, just because there&#039;s a Tunnel some would have us think that we are &#039;part of Europe&#039;.  Nope, sorry sunshine, but nope.  The view from this end of the Tunnel is that all it means is that we can trade more easily with you.  You can buy our stuff and we can buy your stuff.  It does not mean that we can be more &#039;connected&#039; with you politically.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ho! Ho! &#8216;Fog in channel, Continent cut off&#8217;? Perhaps, well, no, definitely.  </p>
<p>You can argue about the causes for Hitler&#8217;s failure to follow up on Dunkirk; German General Staff unable to think maritime, Hitler&#8217;s strategic failure and thoughts on negotiation plus the planned Barbarrosa operation for which he needed troops, Goerings offer that he could bomb us into surrender with flawed tactics, and so on.  But fundamentally the UK democratic system survived fierce internal debate and terrifying external threats and provided a generally unanimous effort to defeat tyranny.  Churchill, despite his near dictatorship powers still supported democracy and went to the House twice a week (unlike that clown Blair who only went once a week) for PM&#8217;s QT.  He also appointed and listened to good advisers, especially his military advisers.</p>
<p>Now, just because there&#8217;s a Tunnel some would have us think that we are &#8216;part of Europe&#8217;.  Nope, sorry sunshine, but nope.  The view from this end of the Tunnel is that all it means is that we can trade more easily with you.  You can buy our stuff and we can buy your stuff.  It does not mean that we can be more &#8216;connected&#8217; with you politically.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
