<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The politics of global warming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/27/the-politics-of-global-warming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/27/the-politics-of-global-warming/</link>
	<description>Conservative Party Candidate for Wokingham</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 09:58:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DennisA</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/27/the-politics-of-global-warming/#comment-50460</link>
		<dc:creator>DennisA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5024#comment-50460</guid>
		<description>But we don&#039;t accept that climate change is caused by humans, except at regional level by land use changes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But we don&#8217;t accept that climate change is caused by humans, except at regional level by land use changes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DennisA</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/27/the-politics-of-global-warming/#comment-50459</link>
		<dc:creator>DennisA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5024#comment-50459</guid>
		<description>Excellent factual analysis</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent factual analysis</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Windisch</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/27/the-politics-of-global-warming/#comment-50365</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Windisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5024#comment-50365</guid>
		<description>Amanda, you said &#039;It seems to me the third world are already where they should be !!&#039; so how are you insulted by what I said? 

Denmark gets 24% of its electricity from wind power, Spain 11%. It isnt that difficult to find such information, or information on ecohouses, yet sadly you dont seem to have haven&#039;t looked it up. 

Please check your facts before making assertions, so you can then give a link to demonstrate what you mean. Such as &#039;I know ventilation is just as important as insulation for health !!&#039; How do you know this? And I didn&#039;t say that insulation was important for health, its important for reducing waste!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amanda, you said &#8216;It seems to me the third world are already where they should be !!&#8217; so how are you insulted by what I said? </p>
<p>Denmark gets 24% of its electricity from wind power, Spain 11%. It isnt that difficult to find such information, or information on ecohouses, yet sadly you dont seem to have haven&#8217;t looked it up. </p>
<p>Please check your facts before making assertions, so you can then give a link to demonstrate what you mean. Such as &#8216;I know ventilation is just as important as insulation for health !!&#8217; How do you know this? And I didn&#8217;t say that insulation was important for health, its important for reducing waste!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Windisch</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/27/the-politics-of-global-warming/#comment-50362</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Windisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5024#comment-50362</guid>
		<description>The 24% is a well known statistic, look it up. Its not something I invented to be used by advertisers!

You speak of increasing wind power generation eventually, I want it to be as soon as possible, why wait? 

You talk about the wind not blowing as this was a new. As I stated already, you cant rely on more than around 30% power from wind, but as the UK is nearer 2% we are nowhere close to this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 24% is a well known statistic, look it up. Its not something I invented to be used by advertisers!</p>
<p>You speak of increasing wind power generation eventually, I want it to be as soon as possible, why wait? </p>
<p>You talk about the wind not blowing as this was a new. As I stated already, you cant rely on more than around 30% power from wind, but as the UK is nearer 2% we are nowhere close to this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross J  Warren</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/27/the-politics-of-global-warming/#comment-50306</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross J  Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5024#comment-50306</guid>
		<description>&quot;this is what the quantum means in quantum mechanics.&quot;

Quantum in its most basic terms is the packets of energy that are produced by atomic structures. A quanta being the smallest step change or packet that can be produced. Quantum mechanics is essentially logical, but can and does become less reliable when attempting to understand large amounts of gas, we may be better served by chaos theory when trying to pin down such massive effects. In other words Quantum can be appealed to but justify the maths.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;this is what the quantum means in quantum mechanics.&#8221;</p>
<p>Quantum in its most basic terms is the packets of energy that are produced by atomic structures. A quanta being the smallest step change or packet that can be produced. Quantum mechanics is essentially logical, but can and does become less reliable when attempting to understand large amounts of gas, we may be better served by chaos theory when trying to pin down such massive effects. In other words Quantum can be appealed to but justify the maths.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross J  Warren</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/27/the-politics-of-global-warming/#comment-50303</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross J  Warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 18:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5024#comment-50303</guid>
		<description>&quot;Nobody wants pollution but CO2 is not a pollutant.&quot;

In fact not only is Co2 not a pollutant, it is vital gas that underpins our complex ecology. I understand this and personal I feel that the Americans may be just a tad responsible to the distortion. Methane is a more insidious danger and it appears from the Ice Core record that this gas has been high in other Climate change events.
The US cattle trade being a very large contributor to the increase in this gas in the atmosphere. My concern is that we raise the temperature to far at the seabed, resulting in a very large release of further Methane liberated from the Hydrate reserve, a considerable amount of which exists. Of course if we could find a way to remove the Methane hydrate we could burn it. Methane is in fact an excellent fuel which when properly  burnt becomes many times less damaging than if released directly. We should of course be looking at ways to trap and burn Methane</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Nobody wants pollution but CO2 is not a pollutant.&#8221;</p>
<p>In fact not only is Co2 not a pollutant, it is vital gas that underpins our complex ecology. I understand this and personal I feel that the Americans may be just a tad responsible to the distortion. Methane is a more insidious danger and it appears from the Ice Core record that this gas has been high in other Climate change events.<br />
The US cattle trade being a very large contributor to the increase in this gas in the atmosphere. My concern is that we raise the temperature to far at the seabed, resulting in a very large release of further Methane liberated from the Hydrate reserve, a considerable amount of which exists. Of course if we could find a way to remove the Methane hydrate we could burn it. Methane is in fact an excellent fuel which when properly  burnt becomes many times less damaging than if released directly. We should of course be looking at ways to trap and burn Methane</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What about some real competition between banks</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/27/the-politics-of-global-warming/#comment-50281</link>
		<dc:creator>What about some real competition between banks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5024#comment-50281</guid>
		<description>You might say embarrassing things using a personal email account when communicating with friends, but these are publicly funded academics using their institutions email services to discuss work for the IPCC, etc. The tone of a number of the quoted emails is unprofessional and brings their own institutions into disrepute. 
If this were to go to court the authors of the emails would look both unprofessional and incompetent - particularly where senior individuals are condoning/encouraging (such-ed) acts such as the deletion of material to prevent it being release of material via FOI requests.
If these leaked emails had been from director/senior managers of major financial institutions would you be happy continuing to invest with them? I certainly would not and the market would probably take a similar view!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might say embarrassing things using a personal email account when communicating with friends, but these are publicly funded academics using their institutions email services to discuss work for the IPCC, etc. The tone of a number of the quoted emails is unprofessional and brings their own institutions into disrepute.<br />
If this were to go to court the authors of the emails would look both unprofessional and incompetent &#8211; particularly where senior individuals are condoning/encouraging (such-ed) acts such as the deletion of material to prevent it being release of material via FOI requests.<br />
If these leaked emails had been from director/senior managers of major financial institutions would you be happy continuing to invest with them? I certainly would not and the market would probably take a similar view!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/27/the-politics-of-global-warming/#comment-50274</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 13:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5024#comment-50274</guid>
		<description>I know ventilation is just as important as insulation for health !!   And I also know it is more than a question of opening windows,  do you?

&quot;you will spend thousands heating your home in cold winters &quot;  - exactly COLD WINTERS. 

Great term &#039;diddly squat&#039; - so which developed contries produce 10-20% of their power then from this source?

&quot;You may wish to keep developing countries in poverty&quot; - insulting statement from someone who has no idea of the work I do or my views, does this reflect the quality of your logic and arguement??  However,  I will tell you this, poverty in some countires is not the fault of people in others, and more than the poverty in some houses is the fault of others.   

&quot;Fair share of resources&quot; is a emotive Marxist term.  Countries have different resources and then we trade, that is what the economic theories of trade are all about, and which bring advantage to everyone - provided they do not saddle themselves with dictators and socialist governments.   And if you are worried about the fair share of resources in your terms,  then I would worry more about what the Chinese are doing in Africa if I were you.  

Some of us already have solar panels,  and when the sun shines it HELPS heat water,  however in the UK this is unlikely to be the way we heat all water in the near future.  Maybe in the more distant future new technologies may emerge.  Green industries may indeed produce more jobs,  but if we householders are all so poor through taxes that we cannot keep up to and improve our houses,  then those jobs will not materialise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know ventilation is just as important as insulation for health !!   And I also know it is more than a question of opening windows,  do you?</p>
<p>&#8220;you will spend thousands heating your home in cold winters &#8221;  &#8211; exactly COLD WINTERS. </p>
<p>Great term &#8216;diddly squat&#8217; &#8211; so which developed contries produce 10-20% of their power then from this source?</p>
<p>&#8220;You may wish to keep developing countries in poverty&#8221; &#8211; insulting statement from someone who has no idea of the work I do or my views, does this reflect the quality of your logic and arguement??  However,  I will tell you this, poverty in some countires is not the fault of people in others, and more than the poverty in some houses is the fault of others.   </p>
<p>&#8220;Fair share of resources&#8221; is a emotive Marxist term.  Countries have different resources and then we trade, that is what the economic theories of trade are all about, and which bring advantage to everyone &#8211; provided they do not saddle themselves with dictators and socialist governments.   And if you are worried about the fair share of resources in your terms,  then I would worry more about what the Chinese are doing in Africa if I were you.  </p>
<p>Some of us already have solar panels,  and when the sun shines it HELPS heat water,  however in the UK this is unlikely to be the way we heat all water in the near future.  Maybe in the more distant future new technologies may emerge.  Green industries may indeed produce more jobs,  but if we householders are all so poor through taxes that we cannot keep up to and improve our houses,  then those jobs will not materialise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eotvos</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/27/the-politics-of-global-warming/#comment-50215</link>
		<dc:creator>Eotvos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 18:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5024#comment-50215</guid>
		<description>It would be a lot quicker and relevant if we had an (word left out) investigation into the (researchers ed) at the CRU who have been taking taxpayers money - $25M - and (producing questionable results -ed).

AGW is a complete myth.  Mann , Gore , Jones , Trenbeth, Briffa (set out this theory which the blogger disagrees with -ed).  Four of these individuals are the core of the UN IPCC and Gore was their frontman.  This month on American TV Gore claimed that the temperature 2 kms below our feet was 2 - 3 million degrees - the surface of the sun is cooler than that.  (Personal attacks on Gore and Obama left out-ed)

Nobody wants pollution but CO2 is not a pollutant.  All life on Earth depends on it.  It is also not able to absorb a lot of IR - this is what the quantum means in quantum mechanics.  In fact it only absorbs at three frequencies in the IR band and at ambient temperatures in our atmosphere cannot interact with the 300 micron band - although that causes a vibrational transition in H2O, interestingly (0.4 - 4% of our atmosphere compared to 0.013% CO2).

The calculation produced by Svente Arrhenius in 1896, on the back of a fag packet, that the planet is 33C warmer than it should be is (wrong-ed).  It does not take account of all heat transfer processes like conduction and convection.  See Gerhard and Tscheuschner, contemporary mathematical physicists, (some straightforward calculus but mostly qualitative) - I&#039;m sorry I can&#039;t be bothered posting hyperlinks tonight.

&#039;YouTube&#039; has any number of videos debunking this nonsense.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be a lot quicker and relevant if we had an (word left out) investigation into the (researchers ed) at the CRU who have been taking taxpayers money &#8211; $25M &#8211; and (producing questionable results -ed).</p>
<p>AGW is a complete myth.  Mann , Gore , Jones , Trenbeth, Briffa (set out this theory which the blogger disagrees with -ed).  Four of these individuals are the core of the UN IPCC and Gore was their frontman.  This month on American TV Gore claimed that the temperature 2 kms below our feet was 2 &#8211; 3 million degrees &#8211; the surface of the sun is cooler than that.  (Personal attacks on Gore and Obama left out-ed)</p>
<p>Nobody wants pollution but CO2 is not a pollutant.  All life on Earth depends on it.  It is also not able to absorb a lot of IR &#8211; this is what the quantum means in quantum mechanics.  In fact it only absorbs at three frequencies in the IR band and at ambient temperatures in our atmosphere cannot interact with the 300 micron band &#8211; although that causes a vibrational transition in H2O, interestingly (0.4 &#8211; 4% of our atmosphere compared to 0.013% CO2).</p>
<p>The calculation produced by Svente Arrhenius in 1896, on the back of a fag packet, that the planet is 33C warmer than it should be is (wrong-ed).  It does not take account of all heat transfer processes like conduction and convection.  See Gerhard and Tscheuschner, contemporary mathematical physicists, (some straightforward calculus but mostly qualitative) &#8211; I&#8217;m sorry I can&#8217;t be bothered posting hyperlinks tonight.</p>
<p>&#8216;YouTube&#8217; has any number of videos debunking this nonsense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Craig</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/27/the-politics-of-global-warming/#comment-50191</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5024#comment-50191</guid>
		<description>Vaclav Klaus is probably the east European you mean though the Poles are of a similar opinion. Klaus has said pretty much the same as you about politicians knowing perfectly well that it is a lie but being afraid to speak out. I suspect one of the effects of this is that they may be equally scared to be seen supporting what is obviously not just error but deliberate &amp; massive fraud.

Russians generally do not believe this &amp; the Russian Academy of Sciences has played an honourable role in refuting this. An example of our media censorship is that Andrey Illarionov, a free market advisor of Putin whose statements on Putin, when he resigned, were massively trumpeted by our media has also said &quot;“Ideology on which the Kyoto Protocol is based, is a new form of totalitarian ideology, along with Marxism, Communism and socialism.” wghich, with the honesty, integrity &amp; impariality which our media so enthusiastically display, was massively, indeed entirely, censored by them</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vaclav Klaus is probably the east European you mean though the Poles are of a similar opinion. Klaus has said pretty much the same as you about politicians knowing perfectly well that it is a lie but being afraid to speak out. I suspect one of the effects of this is that they may be equally scared to be seen supporting what is obviously not just error but deliberate &amp; massive fraud.</p>
<p>Russians generally do not believe this &amp; the Russian Academy of Sciences has played an honourable role in refuting this. An example of our media censorship is that Andrey Illarionov, a free market advisor of Putin whose statements on Putin, when he resigned, were massively trumpeted by our media has also said &#8220;“Ideology on which the Kyoto Protocol is based, is a new form of totalitarian ideology, along with Marxism, Communism and socialism.” wghich, with the honesty, integrity &amp; impariality which our media so enthusiastically display, was massively, indeed entirely, censored by them</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Windisch</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/27/the-politics-of-global-warming/#comment-50189</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Windisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5024#comment-50189</guid>
		<description>Amanda,
You think ventilation is more important that insulation? Open a window if its stuffy. But you will spend thousands heating your home in cold winters if the insulation is poor. Energy going straight out the window. Clever use of heat exchangers can capture the hear from expelled air and warm incoming.

There are many factors to making an eco house, this is not the place for a list of them. It would include water saving, energy saving, using low energy construction etc. 
If wind turbines provide so little energy, why do some countries get 10 to 20% of their power from them?  ‘Diddly squat’ indeed. 

You may wish to keep developing countries in poverty, others think everyone in the world should have a more fair share of resources. 

After insulating homes, green jobs could be found by getting solar hot water on every roof. There are many millions of homes, some in very poor condition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amanda,<br />
You think ventilation is more important that insulation? Open a window if its stuffy. But you will spend thousands heating your home in cold winters if the insulation is poor. Energy going straight out the window. Clever use of heat exchangers can capture the hear from expelled air and warm incoming.</p>
<p>There are many factors to making an eco house, this is not the place for a list of them. It would include water saving, energy saving, using low energy construction etc.<br />
If wind turbines provide so little energy, why do some countries get 10 to 20% of their power from them?  ‘Diddly squat’ indeed. </p>
<p>You may wish to keep developing countries in poverty, others think everyone in the world should have a more fair share of resources. </p>
<p>After insulating homes, green jobs could be found by getting solar hot water on every roof. There are many millions of homes, some in very poor condition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Windisch</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/27/the-politics-of-global-warming/#comment-50187</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Windisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5024#comment-50187</guid>
		<description>People say global warming, as the average temperature will increase. But there will be more chaos, unseasonal weather, heavy rain in the summer etc. So not easy to predict. 

A well insulated house needs little heating in cold conditions, its also good at keeping the heat out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People say global warming, as the average temperature will increase. But there will be more chaos, unseasonal weather, heavy rain in the summer etc. So not easy to predict. </p>
<p>A well insulated house needs little heating in cold conditions, its also good at keeping the heat out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Windisch</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/27/the-politics-of-global-warming/#comment-50186</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Windisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 11:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5024#comment-50186</guid>
		<description>If you follow science you will know global warming is real and coming, a few emails from years ago make no difference.

Anyone whose emails were hacked into would have some embarrassment revealed to the world. We say things to friends that are not meant for the public.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you follow science you will know global warming is real and coming, a few emails from years ago make no difference.</p>
<p>Anyone whose emails were hacked into would have some embarrassment revealed to the world. We say things to friends that are not meant for the public.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/27/the-politics-of-global-warming/#comment-50183</link>
		<dc:creator>AT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5024#comment-50183</guid>
		<description>PS - you mention standards. Congratulations - I think you are the first politician to do so. 


This is as big an issue as the alleged (misleading of the puboic -ed). Potentially bigger. The case for (substantial misleading-ed) is convincing, but still unproven. The standards issue is systemic and easily proven. ( I&#039;ve posted more on this on CH. )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS &#8211; you mention standards. Congratulations &#8211; I think you are the first politician to do so. </p>
<p>This is as big an issue as the alleged (misleading of the puboic -ed). Potentially bigger. The case for (substantial misleading-ed) is convincing, but still unproven. The standards issue is systemic and easily proven. ( I&#8217;ve posted more on this on CH. )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BruLaw</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/27/the-politics-of-global-warming/#comment-50182</link>
		<dc:creator>BruLaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5024#comment-50182</guid>
		<description>I referred this subject to Alan Duncan (my MP) at the House of Commons a few days ago - reponse NIL. I referred this to the PM&#039;s office ditto - response NIL. 
There is  massive questioning of the UEA/CRU leak, let alone the
thunderous noise on Google (worldwide and in the UK) and on other sites regarding the lack of involvement by the BBC and the print media - with the main exception of the Spectator and the Mail. Hopefully Brooker will have something to say tomorrow in the Sunday Telegraph.
Even Monbiot has called for Jones to be sacked and the data re-analysed.
Just what is ongoing here-other than sealed lips and prayers for a positive Copenhagen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I referred this subject to Alan Duncan (my MP) at the House of Commons a few days ago &#8211; reponse NIL. I referred this to the PM&#8217;s office ditto &#8211; response NIL.<br />
There is  massive questioning of the UEA/CRU leak, let alone the<br />
thunderous noise on Google (worldwide and in the UK) and on other sites regarding the lack of involvement by the BBC and the print media &#8211; with the main exception of the Spectator and the Mail. Hopefully Brooker will have something to say tomorrow in the Sunday Telegraph.<br />
Even Monbiot has called for Jones to be sacked and the data re-analysed.<br />
Just what is ongoing here-other than sealed lips and prayers for a positive Copenhagen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/27/the-politics-of-global-warming/#comment-50181</link>
		<dc:creator>AT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5024#comment-50181</guid>
		<description>&quot;It would be helpful if in the UK there was a proper enquiry into what has been happening to the evidence and its interpretation at East Anglia. Where public money is being spent on scientific research we need to be assured the standards and independence of the research are worthy of public support&quot;

John, this is absolutely the case. Acceptance of AGW is about to change our society. So this is potentially the most important paragraph that you have ever written in your political life.  In agreement with others who have posted, you should add transparency to this. [ There is no excuse for the material not being public domain, and this would have flagged up the problems much earlier ]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It would be helpful if in the UK there was a proper enquiry into what has been happening to the evidence and its interpretation at East Anglia. Where public money is being spent on scientific research we need to be assured the standards and independence of the research are worthy of public support&#8221;</p>
<p>John, this is absolutely the case. Acceptance of AGW is about to change our society. So this is potentially the most important paragraph that you have ever written in your political life.  In agreement with others who have posted, you should add transparency to this. [ There is no excuse for the material not being public domain, and this would have flagged up the problems much earlier ]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Acorn</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/27/the-politics-of-global-warming/#comment-50180</link>
		<dc:creator>Acorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5024#comment-50180</guid>
		<description>Adrian.  Have a look at the following, &quot;24% electricity from wind&quot;, is the quote you give to the advertising department to use; the reality is a lot different, even in Germany with its 20 GW of wind turbines.  If you ever get the chance, talk to some German power engineers and get them to tell you the story; &quot;the day the wind didn&#039;t blow all over Germany&quot;. 


BTW.  Thanks to the CEGB building the 400kV supergrid, the lights remain on in the south of England, where there is a lack of generation capability.

The system end to end looses about 7% not masses as stated elsewhere.  The gas network looses a bit more, powering compressors to push it around the pipes, and storing gas in the pipes and the few storage volumes we have.

The electricity grid and the gas grid are now interconnected; because of the large amount of gas fired CCGT electric on the system.

After round 3 offshore licensing, there could be up to 39 GW of windmills around our coasts, eventually.  Peak demand will be around 60 - 65 GW.  So apart from paying through the nose for these turbines how much will the guys providing the back-up want paying for when the wind don&#039;t blow?  Fortunately the lads at NG are on the case.

There is a big future in HVDC connectors to the continent.  Our UK electric suppliers won&#039;t talk about those much; inter-connectors mean foreign competition!!!

http://www.nationalgrid.com/uk/sys_09/default.asp?action=mnch10_13.htm&amp;Node=SYS&amp;Snode=10_13&amp;E=Y</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adrian.  Have a look at the following, &#8220;24% electricity from wind&#8221;, is the quote you give to the advertising department to use; the reality is a lot different, even in Germany with its 20 GW of wind turbines.  If you ever get the chance, talk to some German power engineers and get them to tell you the story; &#8220;the day the wind didn&#8217;t blow all over Germany&#8221;. </p>
<p>BTW.  Thanks to the CEGB building the 400kV supergrid, the lights remain on in the south of England, where there is a lack of generation capability.</p>
<p>The system end to end looses about 7% not masses as stated elsewhere.  The gas network looses a bit more, powering compressors to push it around the pipes, and storing gas in the pipes and the few storage volumes we have.</p>
<p>The electricity grid and the gas grid are now interconnected; because of the large amount of gas fired CCGT electric on the system.</p>
<p>After round 3 offshore licensing, there could be up to 39 GW of windmills around our coasts, eventually.  Peak demand will be around 60 &#8211; 65 GW.  So apart from paying through the nose for these turbines how much will the guys providing the back-up want paying for when the wind don&#8217;t blow?  Fortunately the lads at NG are on the case.</p>
<p>There is a big future in HVDC connectors to the continent.  Our UK electric suppliers won&#8217;t talk about those much; inter-connectors mean foreign competition!!!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nationalgrid.com/uk/sys_09/default.asp?action=mnch10_13.htm&amp;Node=SYS&amp;Snode=10_13&amp;E=Y" rel="nofollow">http://www.nationalgrid.com/uk/sys_09/default.asp?action=mnch10_13.htm&amp;Node=SYS&amp;Snode=10_13&amp;E=Y</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/27/the-politics-of-global-warming/#comment-50176</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5024#comment-50176</guid>
		<description>Denmark has the luxury of being able to import 83% of its requirements when the wind doesn&#039;t blow from Germany, Norway or Sweden.  Yet they consume 7 times as much coal energy as the wind energy they produce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Denmark has the luxury of being able to import 83% of its requirements when the wind doesn&#8217;t blow from Germany, Norway or Sweden.  Yet they consume 7 times as much coal energy as the wind energy they produce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/27/the-politics-of-global-warming/#comment-50174</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5024#comment-50174</guid>
		<description>...after just £1m to help with the floods in Cumbria.  Maybe they&#039;d have done better if they were in a Labour marginal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;after just £1m to help with the floods in Cumbria.  Maybe they&#8217;d have done better if they were in a Labour marginal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Tomkinson</title>
		<link>http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/2009/11/27/the-politics-of-global-warming/#comment-50172</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Tomkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 09:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.johnredwoodsdiary.com/?p=5024#comment-50172</guid>
		<description>I have just read Cameron&#039;s latest on The Blue Blog. Totally sold on man-made climate change, no mention of the CRU at the University of East Anglia. TAXPAYERS&#039; MONEY used to (produce-ed) results to match a theory but Cameron and your party say NOTHING. This is a scandal. Is it embarrassment or something more sinister that prevents the Conservative party from performing its duty?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just read Cameron&#8217;s latest on The Blue Blog. Totally sold on man-made climate change, no mention of the CRU at the University of East Anglia. TAXPAYERS&#8217; MONEY used to (produce-ed) results to match a theory but Cameron and your party say NOTHING. This is a scandal. Is it embarrassment or something more sinister that prevents the Conservative party from performing its duty?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
